GNU bug report logs - #45909
rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:51:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 45909 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 45909 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45909; Package guix. (Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:50:13 +0000

The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the
master branch.
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45909; Package guix. (Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:20:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 45909 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 45909 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45909: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:19:46 -0500

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:50:13PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the
> master branch.

If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages that
depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but these
failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.
Reply sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 45909-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, 45909-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45909: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:26:44 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Famulari 写道：
> If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages 
> that
> depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but 
> these
> failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.

Thanks.  I am reverting the update on master for now.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 69 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.