X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B.16107678713865 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: Guix Bugs <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16107678713865
(code B ref -1); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:32:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 03:31:11 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0cIi-0000zk-EJ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:31:11 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43820)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l0cId-0000za-Mm
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:30:54 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39052)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0cIc-0008Hu-MJ
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:30:51 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:44568)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0cIa-0005oh-Nt
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:30:50 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DHk8G3Z82zFmJj
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:30:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1610767836; bh=5SOGcQSLEpJ0w+6pgjoNxl4F205JhOla74XtePQ4IeE=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
b=fk5jUoWr/zFtS/clgRY00vFWhe6LnliLlTDS7a2yNgBQhon8fnRYripGbInbE3JA/
xXMshg2/c88Th78JN4enUAkphRFpWlVsauaoH+b6jJynWcVKHxKCXgOiLmPwJ5CGMG
LgnqbFeOmEtkCGKKQ8RofPD61jfl28wlRpBj6hFw=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 7CF458865CEC495C22ABF4ADB9C5FE03B6F4901F048A81CD1AFF12DA7E21993A
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DHk8F550lz5xsH
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:16:15 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129;
envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
* that is not a valid field of operating-system
* there is no such item in the Guix info page's index
* the relevant example loads a single key from a file, without
indicating what the syntax of the file is
* trying to store /etc/guix/signing-key.pub as a Scheme file results in
a parser error due to the hexadecimal syntax being incompatible with
some Scheme syntax weirdness
So, how the hecc do I add keys permanently the Official Way? Because I
have no idea. I'll try to update the docs when I figure it out.
OOoor... the person who introduced the change could document it. :|
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#45911: Acknowledgement (authorized-fields is not/badly documented) Message-ID: <handler.45911.B.16107678713865.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 45911 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:32:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-guix@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 45911: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D45911 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B.161077746318737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161077746318737
(code B ref -1); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:12:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 06:11:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0enf-0004s9-3h
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:03 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34420)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1l0enc-0004rj-2d
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:01 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47710)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0enb-0005ZO-QZ
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:10:59 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o55.zoho.com ([136.143.188.55]:21527)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0enZ-00020T-VF
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:10:59 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610777453; cv=none;
d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc;
b=J+DPtC/yJUSKYm7de/mMlkv8JjRsm7yVJewSIPCUZGUdB4UDFdPHpd8SNb+i1BwMRx53eqtvA1tXRe6fkpFdVYqsPsL4aU141D3juPhXqJfZ5qvemKKFPPhYeK6YAjvBySM2x/6l1HsbuIxV+YEZ+7FIH38TekXA3eQcydRe218=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com;
s=zohoarc; t=1610777453;
h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To;
bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=;
b=EObVrO+XOh3aqzD74ixbZ+uB+Qh+/hfgqDNN0D3A26SvaXAx+WDQgae1liaPGumWYFwVTfCmAa6pyQLEXyd4StGK6A5T3dkRmKCStLCz/mdRHKA+Eh2IrYztuYddebTNXcZKGVFnAPElRhbbEwhvTJZeIXCEWYfxWEBsWsr7BBI=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1610777453;
s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=;
b=bzAjJqQd+uJ+Jc19DqN3QroA/hkibyD7yGV4odo49WumNr4tTb6Yue6h2fFYlrbe
6XlMfae1uuY7Mong1DCXeR4edPYBfrPc8hNI4dyRM0PZLoZvugQo8ifFdESp8bjnaRN
Ci19aZwQGJ0I9rZCzjC6uZl/FPvo30O4gBcOOTEc=
Received: from localhost (p54ad45cb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.69.203]) by
mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1610777451166709.1902724974738;
Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:10:51 -0800 (PST)
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.55; envelope-from=rekado@HIDDEN;
helo=sender4-of-o55.zoho.com
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
> guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
>
> * that is not a valid field of operating-system
That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, which is=
documented
in 10.8.1 Base Services.
--=20
Ricardo
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161077748018890 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161077748018890
(code B ref 45911); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:12:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 06:11:20 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0enw-0004uc-ED
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:20 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o55.zoho.com ([136.143.188.55]:21535)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1l0env-0004uU-4Q
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:19 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610777453; cv=none;
d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc;
b=J+DPtC/yJUSKYm7de/mMlkv8JjRsm7yVJewSIPCUZGUdB4UDFdPHpd8SNb+i1BwMRx53eqtvA1tXRe6fkpFdVYqsPsL4aU141D3juPhXqJfZ5qvemKKFPPhYeK6YAjvBySM2x/6l1HsbuIxV+YEZ+7FIH38TekXA3eQcydRe218=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com;
s=zohoarc; t=1610777453;
h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To;
bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=;
b=EObVrO+XOh3aqzD74ixbZ+uB+Qh+/hfgqDNN0D3A26SvaXAx+WDQgae1liaPGumWYFwVTfCmAa6pyQLEXyd4StGK6A5T3dkRmKCStLCz/mdRHKA+Eh2IrYztuYddebTNXcZKGVFnAPElRhbbEwhvTJZeIXCEWYfxWEBsWsr7BBI=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1610777453;
s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=;
b=bzAjJqQd+uJ+Jc19DqN3QroA/hkibyD7yGV4odo49WumNr4tTb6Yue6h2fFYlrbe
6XlMfae1uuY7Mong1DCXeR4edPYBfrPc8hNI4dyRM0PZLoZvugQo8ifFdESp8bjnaRN
Ci19aZwQGJ0I9rZCzjC6uZl/FPvo30O4gBcOOTEc=
Received: from localhost (p54ad45cb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.69.203]) by
mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1610777451166709.1902724974738;
Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:10:51 -0800 (PST)
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes: > guix archive
--authorize
started issuing a warning some time ago > pointing to "authorized-keys" in
"operating-system". > > * that is not a valid field of operating-system
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2)
[136.143.188.55 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [136.143.188.55 listed in list.dnswl.org]
2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches
everything in local email
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
> guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
>
> * that is not a valid field of operating-system
That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, which is=
documented
in 10.8.1 Base Services.
--=20
Ricardo
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:42:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B.161084410319590 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161084410319590
(code B ref -1); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:42:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 00:41:43 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44366 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0w8U-00055u-Ut
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:43 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39620)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l0w8S-00055f-Sa
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:41 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46074)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0w8S-0003pc-LK
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:40 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:46152)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
id 1l0w8Q-0007l5-Go
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:40 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DJGM26xGPzDqMr;
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:41:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1610844095; bh=IRCDcyh05sWui3Qi+MSWb4JrrLJ8vkzlBRx25bwp1H8=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=nJAttK1TNLHooyayvIYvhte4YSZ0vMqGLgdPkpuuKXhfYSMkiKY+59ux0rqCYT0X7
y8msh2qvHBzwZewkOu8LuHUYRdynZ9xrBO8C+mKW8+p4Hz2g7+6C1c1es7gIp5jf1K
iMv/UjWWnPtvgsu+wxaRJ7lU3aTOxBxq4f6O52Sw=
X-Riseup-User-ID: CD07B6D85F0A23FBA5485987E81E28FCAD11315DE6E2A7DA71CDC55764E3C64C
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DJGLz657Vz5wYS;
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:34:49 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129;
envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> wrote:
> raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
>=20
> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
> >
> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
>=20
> That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, which =
is documented
> in 10.8.1 Base Services.
>=20
Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
issues.
I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:42:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161084410119575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161084410119575
(code B ref 45911); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:42:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 00:41:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44363 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0w8S-00055e-My
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:40 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:52194)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l0w8P-00055V-T5
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 19:41:39 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DJGM26xGPzDqMr;
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:41:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1610844095; bh=IRCDcyh05sWui3Qi+MSWb4JrrLJ8vkzlBRx25bwp1H8=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=nJAttK1TNLHooyayvIYvhte4YSZ0vMqGLgdPkpuuKXhfYSMkiKY+59ux0rqCYT0X7
y8msh2qvHBzwZewkOu8LuHUYRdynZ9xrBO8C+mKW8+p4Hz2g7+6C1c1es7gIp5jf1K
iMv/UjWWnPtvgsu+wxaRJ7lU3aTOxBxq4f6O52Sw=
X-Riseup-User-ID: CD07B6D85F0A23FBA5485987E81E28FCAD11315DE6E2A7DA71CDC55764E3C64C
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DJGLz657Vz5wYS;
Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:34:49 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> wrote:
> raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
>=20
> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
> >
> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
>=20
> That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, which =
is documented
> in 10.8.1 Base Services.
>=20
Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
issues.
I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:23:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.16108537241281 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>,Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.16108537241281
(code B ref 45911); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:23:01 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 03:22:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44416 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0ydf-0000Kb-Vg
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:22:04 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:53686)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <julien@HIDDEN>) id 1l0ydd-0000K9-1G
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:22:02 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 342237dc;
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s=
dkim; bh=QO4XjCoX/xd+tP/cZ0t/Mszrcnl/PvGcbb6eogfNKyk=; b=bOg0aei
YOJ49n4lbuV11m1mtiSsKqmpTit5esI+m5L3ghyssH2xSiGQFy9Voykd4Gnwr5Q4
ZU4VQbV4V+Ssk7QM97BB1OZ89xvg03E7d73ngJ6dYkHNw8cwcBrzFiJPKYecR9gz
AYem2IjDN61AWP/J6bw04CqhtNPTZdOCVNMelDnesJlHKrOPlPov2jg4lmpjwlxB
2a39y+wqmJPmhXL6qhXduvlAE4zlHfaY96BSMyyaLPRsn6xeUO5zREc+EVkBvV1q
n1RSnocjmdO2dgpGZe5B3UHzTd2EZYKOblteAGrZW/ygi/DHDg4xoj5x6nsyXYLG
sygGieqUY2B4U5A==
Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1a15c921
(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO);
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:17:25 -0500
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----QY214ZW916IOP7MJ0DTA14EEVAYDBQ"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <936E2328-4662-4330-8BCA-50037B7CE3D7@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
------QY214ZW916IOP7MJ0DTA14EEVAYDBQ
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think you need to pass a file-like object, not a scheme expression=2E Don=
't try to modify or interpret the public key file, just pass it directly as=
-is=2E
Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> =
a =C3=A9crit :
>On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
>Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly=2Enet> wrote:
>
>> raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> writes:
>>=20
>> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
>> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system"=2E
>> >
>> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
>>=20
>> That=E2=80=99s right=2E It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, wh=
ich is
>documented
>> in 10=2E8=2E1 Base Services=2E
>>=20
>
>Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
>issues=2E
>I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
>is=2E Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code=2E
------QY214ZW916IOP7MJ0DTA14EEVAYDBQ
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body>I think you need to pass a file-like object, not a=
scheme expression=2E Don't try to modify or interpret the public key file,=
just pass it directly as-is=2E<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">Le 16 jan=
vier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> a =
=C3=A9crit :<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt =
0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class=3D"k9mail">On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100<br>Ricardo Wurmus=
<rekado@elephly=2Enet> wrote:<br><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; pa=
dding-left: 1ex;">raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> writes:<br><br><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; bord=
er-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> guix archive --authorize s=
tarted issuing a warning some time ago<br> pointing to "authorized-keys" in=
"operating-system"=2E<br><br> * that is not a valid field of operating-sys=
tem <br></blockquote><br>That=E2=80=99s right=2E It=E2=80=99s a field of =
guix-configuration, which is documented<br>in 10=2E8=2E1 Base Services=2E<b=
r><br></blockquote><br>Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran i=
nto the other<br>issues=2E<br>I'm still confused about what the proper way =
to store the config info<br>is=2E Like how I should even store it as Scheme=
source code=2E<br><br><br><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>
------QY214ZW916IOP7MJ0DTA14EEVAYDBQ--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.16108538751551 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>,Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.16108538751551
(code B ref 45911); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:25:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 03:24:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l0yg7-0000Ox-EJ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:24:35 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:53696)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <julien@HIDDEN>) id 1l0yg4-0000On-4L
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:24:34 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 37ddf6c1;
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:24:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s=
dkim; bh=xDNXg1MMW6CVJGaZaULvP/iqiA3JHfMtsT5/ZilSHxI=; b=Sf+o/80
WhLiEia8w+Dn4wO2KNVS5W8UP4DVb5AODgDzETxWFXwk2/WJYMdOZ4ZqYmXjpMku
2V5SKAFtkCOJLoB7KTbsSzh2xSJXmPT0CMcGCFLojG4y3tmhArDnpa/4n1ZjKoky
/LiJvvJglOSw/v9LGJy6/OjBzJ+7GSi8hqsQVgW7cT04uUBeJkxfScAyXMbQyNHj
Qc2UZKNxHXGlTEWCYVyex78w1/HEI43e+NQYuk5AtzZJ5JT7Ocg1v6nX13QNEQWP
3g6CjahwT0tvFW9CWpBKjrR27vlFInZ4xUGIDRVPjuF3pTd4ghv/mlRNe8RrQblf
9wQ0tjM2AoP5U0w==
Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6b2595d5
(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO);
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 03:24:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:24:16 -0500
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----RH66XW44QDUH7I2ODLWSLBCVW7H9DK"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <08BFBF88-A677-47CE-9859-3B2FC33442F6@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
------RH66XW44QDUH7I2ODLWSLBCVW7H9DK
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually, here's how I use it: https://framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-confi=
guration/-/blob/master/systems/tachikoma=2Escm#L69
And the key file is the one generated by guix, unmodified: https://framagi=
t=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/xana=2Epub
Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> =
a =C3=A9crit :
>On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
>Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly=2Enet> wrote:
>
>> raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> writes:
>>=20
>> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
>> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system"=2E
>> >
>> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
>>=20
>> That=E2=80=99s right=2E It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, wh=
ich is
>documented
>> in 10=2E8=2E1 Base Services=2E
>>=20
>
>Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
>issues=2E
>I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
>is=2E Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code=2E
------RH66XW44QDUH7I2ODLWSLBCVW7H9DK
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body>Actually, here's how I use it: <a href=3D"https://=
framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/systems/tachikom=
a=2Escm#L69">https://framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/ma=
ster/systems/tachikoma=2Escm#L69</a><br><br>And the key file is the one gen=
erated by guix, unmodified: <a href=3D"https://framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/syst=
em-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/xana=2Epub">https://framagit=2Eorg/tyre=
unom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/xana=2Epub</a><br><br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote">Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom <rai=
ngloom@riseup=2Enet> a =C3=A9crit :<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204=
); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class=3D"k9mail">On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100<br>Ricardo Wurmus=
<rekado@elephly=2Enet> wrote:<br><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; pa=
dding-left: 1ex;">raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> writes:<br><br><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; bord=
er-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> guix archive --authorize s=
tarted issuing a warning some time ago<br> pointing to "authorized-keys" in=
"operating-system"=2E<br><br> * that is not a valid field of operating-sys=
tem <br></blockquote><br>That=E2=80=99s right=2E It=E2=80=99s a field of =
guix-configuration, which is documented<br>in 10=2E8=2E1 Base Services=2E<b=
r><br></blockquote><br>Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran i=
nto the other<br>issues=2E<br>I'm still confused about what the proper way =
to store the config info<br>is=2E Like how I should even store it as Scheme=
source code=2E<br><br><br><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>
------RH66XW44QDUH7I2ODLWSLBCVW7H9DK--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:50:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161113255930877 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161113255930877
(code B ref 45911); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:50:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 08:49:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l29B0-00081x-US
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:19 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47566)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1l29Az-00081h-C7
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:17 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46724)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1l29At-0007Tx-Gs; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:11 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=58018 helo=ribbon)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1l29As-0003dM-Q4; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:11 -0500
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:49:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN> (raingloom@HIDDEN's
message of "Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:34:49 +0100")
Message-ID: <87lfcof0xm.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
Hi,
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> skribis:
> I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
> is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code.
Did you see this section and do you find it helpful?
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Substitutes-from-Other-S=
ervers.html
Ludo=E2=80=99.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 08:49:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 20 03:49:37 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1l29BJ-00082Z-7a for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1l29BI-00082K-6P for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:36 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1l29BC-0007ca-VM for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:30 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=58022 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1l29BC-0003dd-Fd for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:49:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:49:29 +0100 Message-Id: <87k0s8f0x2.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #45911 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) retitle 45911 'authorized-keys' field is badly documented quit
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:44:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.16111753934612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.16111753934612
(code B ref 45911); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:44:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 20:43:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l2KJt-0001CK-80
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:43:13 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:54468)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l2KJq-0001CB-V5
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:43:12 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DLct21bSyzDsc6;
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:43:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1611175388; bh=/kzZEN6s2v9f68VSEFY7cl1rM3pKAE0b+XlR7+PKIRs=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=RlAOWgWkoFbfn2qymD/Cli0Vg20FwT3tQV/F/Bi+LcSKnbLPTkn73QWahd81nQPwc
rhIdObYxvVZnNlfSH9ab+WgrwCvKQ1VII2zsLz9Xcw5fk+aEKLXQeK/l2PZ2Tec8AS
RAiKgyQVcDIEmDC7BSecwoyXtvdeE7DatuR6M7pM=
X-Riseup-User-ID: BDE7016984C4CF3A619EFB491B5C94985E118482BE98172832888363E403258C
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DLcss64ZMz5wTB;
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:34:11 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210120213411.3420d912@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <08BFBF88-A677-47CE-9859-3B2FC33442F6@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
<08BFBF88-A677-47CE-9859-3B2FC33442F6@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:24:16 -0500
Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Actually, here's how I use it:
> https://framagit.org/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/systems/=
tachikoma.scm#L69
>=20
> And the key file is the one generated by guix, unmodified:
> https://framagit.org/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/xan=
a.pub
>=20
> Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom
> <raingloom@HIDDEN> a =C3=A9crit :
> >On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
> >Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> wrote:
> > =20
> >> raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
> >> =20
> >> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> >> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
> >> >
> >> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
> >>=20
> >> That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, whi=
ch is =20
> >documented =20
> >> in 10.8.1 Base Services.
> >> =20
> >
> >Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
> >issues.
> >I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
> >is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code. =20
Thanks, guess I'll go down the file route for now, but this is an
unsatisfactory solution IMHO.
What if you have multiple keys, or want to only include a subset of
keys in a given machine?
Having to use a file object to store a sexp is an odd choice when every
other part of Guix tries as hard as it can to use sexps and Scheme data
structures for configuration.
If no one wants to fix it, mind if I give it a go?
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161117731715617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161117731715617
(code B ref 45911); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:16:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 21:15:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56363 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l2Kov-00043m-9d
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:15:17 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:55058)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <julien@HIDDEN>) id 1l2Kos-00043d-Of
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:15:15 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a5a8434f;
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s=
dkim; bh=lE4QGTqFz8UKClzUz2JlPbIQrfbS86GivnuHqYmyjfM=; b=Tr+HCrj
F5Eko8si2hQrlLqhrBj8DvTfilkqOzonyt0XixNZMaLpRYUqZfqLC0XpsaCmYSas
ECuYZpzdqbPEJ4mYbzS9rGEwy+kMkPWe666gDlyoaSP830eXP3sAjYfwifxyjhD3
kZSA7PowYNyAeikiNlr3/y0Vb4RjsKFmWziGRbSs1Ycy2xqwKPSGGmstyDQEq2kl
phx3AfoiV/Pj7zfmLjl9q40BfExVPYpzMNxiqSxXAZjTi+0VUnrc4unt2Zx439cj
Ii+0g26/+8mZG3cHaanhMTN4JbtZTVivH49Izd37PKAZhoKpSURpb1NHtMjcLmOy
L+iFzU7S+CRuSZw==
Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a65f8c46
(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO);
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:15:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:15:01 -0500
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20210120213411.3420d912@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
<08BFBF88-A677-47CE-9859-3B2FC33442F6@HIDDEN>
<20210120213411.3420d912@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <A8B5F4CB-39B8-40B1-AC22-36B67ADFE27C@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Le 20 janvier 2021 15:34:11 GMT-05:00, raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> =
a =C3=A9crit :
>On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:24:16 -0500
>Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu> wrote:
>
>> Actually, here's how I use it:
>>
>https://framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/system=
s/tachikoma=2Escm#L69
>>=20
>> And the key file is the one generated by guix, unmodified:
>>
>https://framagit=2Eorg/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/x=
ana=2Epub
>>=20
>> Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom
>> <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> a =C3=A9crit :
>> >On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
>> >Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly=2Enet> wrote:
>> > =20
>> >> raingloom <raingloom@riseup=2Enet> writes:
>> >> =20
>> >> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
>> >> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system"=2E
>> >> >
>> >> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system =20
>> >>=20
>> >> That=E2=80=99s right=2E It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration,=
which is =20
>> >documented =20
>> >> in 10=2E8=2E1 Base Services=2E
>> >> =20
>> >
>> >Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
>> >issues=2E
>> >I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config
>info
>> >is=2E Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code=2E =20
>
>Thanks, guess I'll go down the file route for now, but this is an
>unsatisfactory solution IMHO=2E
>What if you have multiple keys, or want to only include a subset of
>keys in a given machine?
>Having to use a file object to store a sexp is an odd choice when every
>other part of Guix tries as hard as it can to use sexps and Scheme data
>structures for configuration=2E
>
>If no one wants to fix it, mind if I give it a go?
Go ahead :)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 05:40:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161138037428466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161138037428466
(code B ref 45911); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 05:40:01 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2021 05:39:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l3Be2-0007P4-21
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 00:39:34 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:35436)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1l3Bdy-0007Ou-0E
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 00:39:32 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.83])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DN4gz2Nw3zDqGm;
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:39:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1611380367; bh=wXZbbU+oRSQ/VqY5/l17w0KPxTNQejNDKNwgIPc6GcQ=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=ZwYmOwN1a4aU9mmAd2rz/0jYqf/adU8QyzVup8pdmob9O0m3Fe77mFLckGaEQHToS
H1vtbDlWxm0dNBBrcj3mqGwsguB8u/Wuy6BaFgW/JXDpDsiKTWEFAECyAIe2qp6Qh6
F+VdbMT05Khl1UI/CI1ITkC7CuJJ4J0XArq+fGX4=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 911B7C21E08C4F7513E490BFE49B2DEEC4A2999575C258CFF18915CD0B6F0134
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DN4gn5HWNz5vSS;
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 06:39:03 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210123063903.66ad778c@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87lfcof0xm.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN> <87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN>
<20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN> <87lfcof0xm.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:49:09 +0100
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> skribis:
>=20
> > I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config
> > info is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code. =20
>=20
> Did you see this section and do you find it helpful?
>=20
> https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Substitutes-from-Other=
-Servers.html
>=20
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
I have, that's how I found out where the setting even is.
An issue that I only now noticed is that it doesn't explain where to
obtain the signing key from, or the new behaviour of `guix archive
--authorize`.
If no one wants to fix it, I'll submit a patch once I'm done setting up
Snapper and some backups.
Edit after this sat in my queue for a few days:
Okay, so I figured out that I should use a G-Expression if I want to
compute the file, instead of just include it. Still not sure how to
store it as Scheme data, but I have an untested idea involving the
"pipe" syntax for symbols.
Thanks for the pointers!
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45911.B45911.161139304431709 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45911
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 45911-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B45911.161139304431709
(code B ref 45911); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2021 09:10:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1l3EwO-0008FM-FV
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:10:44 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21123)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1l3EwL-0008F9-1h
for 45911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:10:42 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611393021; cv=none;
d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc;
b=fXU6NMBRiqf9YU03Fh4yOy7g/CviCm8tJNnY5bS8Kiwm1y0a05q+CE4uwcuYbcBmXs595L32FUgl6qbXFUPvWbKGlidh85nXuanvue36Ymlgnlfe+j6O4Vqs6v7D6H1h24je0fa56/lIqJfbGtLYPL8tAyy1agZOipcJJ0xfQwM=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com;
s=zohoarc; t=1611393021;
h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To;
bh=goBpACD4D/qd2H9yM2lwIw2S9IJ36D1UQyDgIYl/a90=;
b=YPvZinDQ6bCoLDwPJHM3b6fRebrIB0szTjVU8f/XkYzlpg7o8z72Y2fb+E2/JBjFyUHihhQ2zRPboGtalr52DT+umQtC9y1jxaeMg5dxeSX5lvoXr6uo+hzee0ITXlWUPup1SbnujzNMfGCG9+RDyo9VcolUXUdz0WYzPhA46uY=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1611393021;
s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=goBpACD4D/qd2H9yM2lwIw2S9IJ36D1UQyDgIYl/a90=;
b=FuLVgqwiIqRciPt7hBF3o772NOMtL8TJnWD0P+VRaqoXcFdp+VmBnFPWGgKptmq4
C0Tt25dcz4NNf1wxZNAC5teUXzVErMkbxlAk8xcoyWdePjIBRaYqLZE5nn80wa6NZF/
MVMGh1L0xzj27ndHF/w7DWR1cuh1Xtj82ExcCgmg=
Received: from localhost (p54ad43f8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.67.248]) by
mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1611393018923703.8853503459661;
Sat, 23 Jan 2021 01:10:18 -0800 (PST)
References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@HIDDEN>
<87o8hpbee0.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210117013449.1192d841@HIDDEN>
<87lfcof0xm.fsf@HIDDEN> <20210123063903.66ad778c@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <20210123063903.66ad778c@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:10:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2gkj9xk.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes: > Okay, so I figured
out that I should use a G-Expression if I want to > compute the file, instead
of just include it. Still not sure how to > store it as Scheme data, but
I have an untested idea invo [...]
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [136.143.188.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
[136.143.188.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches
everything in local email
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:
> Okay, so I figured out that I should use a G-Expression if I want to
> compute the file, instead of just include it. Still not sure how to
> store it as Scheme data, but I have an untested idea involving the
> "pipe" syntax for symbols.
Use computed-file instead of local-file.
--
Ricardo
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.