GNU logs - #46038, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#46038: guix 1.2.0 test failure: channels-news, one entry
Resent-From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46038.B.161133463030524 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:56:46 -0800
Message-ID: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c;
 envelope-from=vagrant@HIDDEN; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've uploaded guix 1.2.0 built against guile-2.2 to Debian, and while it
builds fine on the official buildd.debian.org infrastructure, on amd64
and arm64 the "channel-news, one entry" test from tests/channels.scm
fails on tests.reproducible-builds.org.

There are likely a few differences in the two build environments,
possibly including network access.

Does the "channel-news, one entry" test indirectly depend on network or
bootstrap binaries?

Could a difference in locale related variables affect the result of the
test (e.g. LANGUAGE=3Den:en_US vs. LANGUAGE unset, LC_ALL unset
vs. LC_ALL=3DC or LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8)?

  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64/gu=
ix.html

test-name: channel-news, one entry
location: /build/1st/guix-1.2.0/tests/channels.scm:324
source:
+ (test-assert
+   "channel-news, one entry"
+   (with-temporary-git-repository
+     directory
+     `((add ".guix-channel"
+            ,(object->string
+               '(channel (version 0) (news-file "news.scm"))))
+       (commit "first commit")
+       (add "src/a.txt" "A")
+       (commit "second commit")
+       (tag "tag-for-first-news-entry")
+       (add "news.scm"
+            ,(lambda (repository)
+               (let ((previous
+                       (reference-name->oid repository "HEAD")))
+                 (object->string
+                   `(channel-news
+                      (version 0)
+                      (entry (commit ,(oid->string previous))
+                             (title (en "New file!") (eo "Nova dosiero!"))
+                             (body (en "Yeah, a.txt."))))))))
+       (commit "third commit")
+       (add "src/b.txt" "B")
+       (commit "fourth commit")
+       (add hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This =
default branch name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in =
all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint:=20
hint: 	git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint:=20
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this comman=
d:
hint:=20
hint: 	git branch -m <name>
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/guix-directory.6SfxEu/.git/
[master (root-commit) 8b5d0e8] first commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 .guix-channel
[master b8dd467] second commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 src/a.txt
[master 324d7bc] third commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 news.scm
[master 2cd62e1] fourth commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 src/b.txt
[master d0e63c3] fifth commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branc=
h name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in =
all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint:=20
hint: 	git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint:=20
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this comman=
d:
hint:=20
hint: 	git branch -m <name>
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/guix-directory.M2UpCv/.git/
[master (root-commit) f84a5c3] first commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 a.txt
[master b1e63da] second commit
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 b.scm
"news.scm"
+            ,(lambda (repository)
+               (let ((second
+                       (commit-id
+                         (find-commit repository "second commit")))
+                     (previous
+                       (reference-name->oid repository "HEAD")))
+                 (object->string
+                   `(channel-news
+                      (version 0)
+                      (entry (commit ,(oid->string previous))
+                             (title (en "Another file!"))
+                             (body (en "Yeah, b.txt.")))
+                      (entry (tag "tag-for-first-news-entry")
+                             (title (en "Old news.") (eo "Malnova?oj."))
+                             (body (en "For a.txt"))))))))
+       (commit "fifth commit"))
+     (with-repository
+       directory
+       repository
+       (define (find-commit* message)
+         (oid->string
+           (commit-id (find-commit repository message))))
+       (let ((channel
+               (channel
+                 (url (string-append "file://" directory))
+                 (name 'foo)))
+             (commit1 (find-commit* "first commit"))
+             (commit2 (find-commit* "second commit"))
+             (commit3 (find-commit* "third commit"))
+             (commit4 (find-commit* "fourth commit"))
+             (commit5 (find-commit* "fifth commit")))
+         (and (null? (channel-news-for-commit channel commit2))
+              (lset=3D string=3D?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
+                     (list commit2 commit4))
+              (lset=3D equal?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-title
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
+                     '((("en" . "Another file!"))
+                       (("en" . "Old news.") ("eo" . "Malnova?oj."))))
+              (lset=3D string=3D?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit3))
+                     (list commit2))
+              (lset=3D string=3D?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit3 commit1=
))
+                     (list commit2))
+              (lset=3D string=3D?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commit3=
))
+                     (list commit4))
+              (lset=3D string=3D?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commit1=
))
+                     (list commit4 commit2))
+              (lset=3D equal?
+                     (map channel-news-entry-tag
+                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commit1=
))
+                     '(#f "tag-for-first-news-entry")))))))
actual-value: #f
result: FAIL


live well,
  vagrant

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCYAsDzwAKCRDcUY/If5cW
qgGYAP4ndX3GCLNV/hSA2z9pMtDBUAffBv+zSSl7AqtE4sEBAQEA/s8ZTZBt9IZw
EbMykzn6hSLgTM3Se4XRPLLwlrdU3QM=
=7up1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#46038: Acknowledgement (guix 1.2.0 test failure:
 channels-news, one entry)
Message-ID: <handler.46038.B.161133463030524.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 46038
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
46038: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D46038
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#46038: guix 1.3.0rc1 test failure: channels-news, one entry
Resent-From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 02:24:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46038.B46038.1619922210352 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca>
References: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 19:23:17 -0700
Message-ID: <87bl9tvppm.fsf@yucca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2021-01-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I've uploaded guix 1.2.0 built against guile-2.2 to Debian, and while it
> builds fine on the official buildd.debian.org infrastructure, on amd64
> and arm64 the "channel-news, one entry" test from tests/channels.scm
> fails on tests.reproducible-builds.org.
>
> There are likely a few differences in the two build environments,
> possibly including network access.
>
> Does the "channel-news, one entry" test indirectly depend on network or
> bootstrap binaries?
>
> Could a difference in locale related variables affect the result of the
> test (e.g. LANGUAGE=3Den:en_US vs. LANGUAGE unset, LC_ALL unset
> vs. LC_ALL=3DC or LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8)?
>
>   https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64/=
guix.html

Still basically the same story with 1.3.0rc1, in some cases this test
fails, but I haven't consistently figured out what triggers it.


> test-name: channel-news, one entry
> location: /build/1st/guix-1.2.0/tests/channels.scm:324
> source:
> + (test-assert
> +   "channel-news, one entry"
> +   (with-temporary-git-repository
> +     directory
> +     `((add ".guix-channel"
> +            ,(object->string
> +               '(channel (version 0) (news-file "news.scm"))))
> +       (commit "first commit")
> +       (add "src/a.txt" "A")
> +       (commit "second commit")
> +       (tag "tag-for-first-news-entry")
> +       (add "news.scm"
> +            ,(lambda (repository)
> +               (let ((previous
> +                       (reference-name->oid repository "HEAD")))
> +                 (object->string
> +                   `(channel-news
> +                      (version 0)
> +                      (entry (commit ,(oid->string previous))
> +                             (title (en "New file!") (eo "Nova dosiero!"=
))
> +                             (body (en "Yeah, a.txt."))))))))
> +       (commit "third commit")
> +       (add "src/b.txt" "B")
> +       (commit "fourth commit")
> +       (add hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. Thi=
s default branch name
> hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use i=
n all
> hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
> hint:=20
> hint: 	git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
> hint:=20
> hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
> hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this comm=
and:
> hint:=20
> hint: 	git branch -m <name>
> Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/guix-directory.6SfxEu/.git/
> [master (root-commit) 8b5d0e8] first commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 .guix-channel
> [master b8dd467] second commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 src/a.txt
> [master 324d7bc] third commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 news.scm
> [master 2cd62e1] fourth commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 src/b.txt
> [master d0e63c3] fifth commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default bra=
nch name
> hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use i=
n all
> hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
> hint:=20
> hint: 	git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
> hint:=20
> hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
> hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this comm=
and:
> hint:=20
> hint: 	git branch -m <name>
> Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/guix-directory.M2UpCv/.git/
> [master (root-commit) f84a5c3] first commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 a.txt
> [master b1e63da] second commit
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  create mode 100644 b.scm
> "news.scm"
> +            ,(lambda (repository)
> +               (let ((second
> +                       (commit-id
> +                         (find-commit repository "second commit")))
> +                     (previous
> +                       (reference-name->oid repository "HEAD")))
> +                 (object->string
> +                   `(channel-news
> +                      (version 0)
> +                      (entry (commit ,(oid->string previous))
> +                             (title (en "Another file!"))
> +                             (body (en "Yeah, b.txt.")))
> +                      (entry (tag "tag-for-first-news-entry")
> +                             (title (en "Old news.") (eo "Malnova?oj."))
> +                             (body (en "For a.txt"))))))))
> +       (commit "fifth commit"))
> +     (with-repository
> +       directory
> +       repository
> +       (define (find-commit* message)
> +         (oid->string
> +           (commit-id (find-commit repository message))))
> +       (let ((channel
> +               (channel
> +                 (url (string-append "file://" directory))
> +                 (name 'foo)))
> +             (commit1 (find-commit* "first commit"))
> +             (commit2 (find-commit* "second commit"))
> +             (commit3 (find-commit* "third commit"))
> +             (commit4 (find-commit* "fourth commit"))
> +             (commit5 (find-commit* "fifth commit")))
> +         (and (null? (channel-news-for-commit channel commit2))
> +              (lset=3D string=3D?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
> +                     (list commit2 commit4))
> +              (lset=3D equal?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-title
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
> +                     '((("en" . "Another file!"))
> +                       (("en" . "Old news.") ("eo" . "Malnova?oj."))))
> +              (lset=3D string=3D?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit3))
> +                     (list commit2))
> +              (lset=3D string=3D?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit3 commi=
t1))
> +                     (list commit2))
> +              (lset=3D string=3D?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commi=
t3))
> +                     (list commit4))
> +              (lset=3D string=3D?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-commit
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commi=
t1))
> +                     (list commit4 commit2))
> +              (lset=3D equal?
> +                     (map channel-news-entry-tag
> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5 commi=
t1))
> +                     '(#f "tag-for-first-news-entry")))))))
> actual-value: #f
> result: FAIL


live well,
  vagrant

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCYI4NFgAKCRDcUY/If5cW
qrldAQD+BqPUJDBGtukLOZq+IQLxXKIIYgZQKhmOZCK6OupYDgD/XcWmIv7TguzL
YBqXj4yTUtx3PEuEFE0NaBXgL5LALww=
=R028
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#46038: guix 1.3.0rc1 test failure: channels-news, one entry
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 19:54:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46038.B46038.162015803629495 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Cc: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca> <87bl9tvppm.fsf@yucca>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:53:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87bl9tvppm.fsf@yucca> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Sat, 01
 May 2021 19:23:17 -0700")
Message-ID: <875yzymg1h.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Vagrant,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> skribis:

> On 2021-01-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I've uploaded guix 1.2.0 built against guile-2.2 to Debian, and while it
>> builds fine on the official buildd.debian.org infrastructure, on amd64
>> and arm64 the "channel-news, one entry" test from tests/channels.scm
>> fails on tests.reproducible-builds.org.
>>
>> There are likely a few differences in the two build environments,
>> possibly including network access.
>>
>> Does the "channel-news, one entry" test indirectly depend on network or
>> bootstrap binaries?
>>
>> Could a difference in locale related variables affect the result of the
>> test (e.g. LANGUAGE=3Den:en_US vs. LANGUAGE unset, LC_ALL unset
>> vs. LC_ALL=3DC or LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8)?
>>
>>   https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64=
/guix.html
>
> Still basically the same story with 1.3.0rc1, in some cases this test
> fails, but I haven't consistently figured out what triggers it.
>
>
>> test-name: channel-news, one entry
>> location: /build/1st/guix-1.2.0/tests/channels.scm:324
>> source:

[...]

>> +              (lset=3D equal?
>> +                     (map channel-news-entry-title
>> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
>> +                     '((("en" . "Another file!"))
>> +                       (("en" . "Old news.") ("eo" . "Malnova?oj."))))

The culprit is right here: it should read =E2=80=9CMalnova=C4=B5oj=E2=80=9D=
, but there=E2=80=99s a
question mark instead of =E2=80=98=C4=B5=E2=80=99.

Could it be that you=E2=80=99re not running tests in a UTF-8 locale?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#46038: guix 1.3.0rc1 test failure: channels-news, one entry
Resent-From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 22:36:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46038.B46038.16201677173838 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46038
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Cc: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 46038-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B46038.16201677173838
          (code B ref 46038); Tue, 04 May 2021 22:36:01 +0000
Received: (at 46038) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 22:35:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1le3dN-0000zq-0J
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 18:35:17 -0400
Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:45574)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <vagrant@HIDDEN>) id 1le3dK-0000zi-Tw
 for 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 18:35:16 -0400
Received: from localhost (97-120-1-76.ptld.qwest.net [97.120.1.76])
 (Authenticated sender: vagrant@HIDDEN)
 by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D87A31A904;
 Tue,  4 May 2021 15:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <875yzymg1h.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca> <87bl9tvppm.fsf@yucca>
 <875yzymg1h.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:34:44 -0700
Message-ID: <871ramt9ff.fsf@yucca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2021-05-04, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>> On 2021-01-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> I've uploaded guix 1.2.0 built against guile-2.2 to Debian, and while it
>>> builds fine on the official buildd.debian.org infrastructure, on amd64
>>> and arm64 the "channel-news, one entry" test from tests/channels.scm
>>> fails on tests.reproducible-builds.org.
>>>
>>> There are likely a few differences in the two build environments,
>>> possibly including network access.
>>>
>>> Does the "channel-news, one entry" test indirectly depend on network or
>>> bootstrap binaries?
>>>
>>> Could a difference in locale related variables affect the result of the
>>> test (e.g. LANGUAGE=3Den:en_US vs. LANGUAGE unset, LC_ALL unset
>>> vs. LC_ALL=3DC or LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8)?
>>>
>>>   https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/experimental/amd6=
4/guix.html
>>
>> Still basically the same story with 1.3.0rc1, in some cases this test
>> fails, but I haven't consistently figured out what triggers it.
>>
>>
>>> test-name: channel-news, one entry
>>> location: /build/1st/guix-1.2.0/tests/channels.scm:324
>>> source:
>
> [...]
>
>>> +              (lset=3D equal?
>>> +                     (map channel-news-entry-title
>>> +                          (channel-news-for-commit channel commit5))
>>> +                     '((("en" . "Another file!"))
>>> +                       (("en" . "Old news.") ("eo" . "Malnova?oj."))))
>
> The culprit is right here: it should read =E2=80=9CMalnova=C4=B5oj=E2=80=
=9D, but there=E2=80=99s a
> question mark instead of =E2=80=98=C4=B5=E2=80=99.
>
> Could it be that you=E2=80=99re not running tests in a UTF-8 locale?

Thanks for taking a deeper look!

Yes, on tests.reproducible-builds.org, one build is run in the C locale,
the other in various UTF-8 locales (somewhat arbitrarily tied to
architecture exactly which UTF-8 locale is used). I'm guessing
buildd.debian.org use C.UTF-8, since it builds fine there.

So now the question is what to do; should tests be able to assume a
UTF-8 locale?

Should I try to adapt the test to work in C?

Should I workaround it in the Debian packaging by forcing to use a UTF-8
locale (on Debian, the only one definitely available is C.UTF-8, which
isn't in upstream glibc, and thus not in guix itself).


live well,
  vagrant

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCYJHMBAAKCRDcUY/If5cW
qqQDAP9kMwfAOx1eDo/+OGZydmkGRjDxwHkSAM9htT3Fhb7f/wEA9sWmJj8hMmuE
BjjFH33rWIzeofrSHZ0I+moziOEbAQo=
=L1QL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#46038: guix 1.3.0rc1 test failure: channels-news, one entry
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:47:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46038.B46038.16202980197843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46038
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>
Cc: 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 46038-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B46038.16202980197843
          (code B ref 46038); Thu, 06 May 2021 10:47:01 +0000
Received: (at 46038) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:46:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37335 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lebX0-00022D-Ow
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:46:58 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52182)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lebWy-0001x7-Ia
 for 46038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:46:57 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57176)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1lebWs-00058K-Un; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:46:50 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60832 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1lebWs-0005FR-Gs; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:46:50 -0400
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <87lfck6hbl.fsf@yucca> <87bl9tvppm.fsf@yucca>
 <875yzymg1h.fsf@HIDDEN> <871ramt9ff.fsf@yucca>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 12:46:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <871ramt9ff.fsf@yucca> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Tue, 04
 May 2021 15:34:44 -0700")
Message-ID: <87eeekgmw7.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> skribis:

> So now the question is what to do; should tests be able to assume a
> UTF-8 locale?
>
> Should I try to adapt the test to work in C?
>
> Should I workaround it in the Debian packaging by forcing to use a UTF-8
> locale (on Debian, the only one definitely available is C.UTF-8, which
> isn't in upstream glibc, and thus not in guix itself).

Since it=E2=80=99s the only test that makes this assumption, you can choose
whichever option sounds best to you.  In Guix proper, I=E2=80=99d rather as=
sume
we=E2=80=99re running in a UTF-8 locale.  If that=E2=80=99s not a good opti=
on for you,
you could patch this one non-ASCII character.

HTH!

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 13:43:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 27 08:43:54 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mqxze-0008SX-9Z
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:43:54 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:45616)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1mqxzc-0008SO-4Q
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:43:52 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=sY7yJQTzkS/db
 UkUTIPguPsziLrC9LRQjPq3if/yBcg=; h=date:to:from; d=tobias.gr;
 b=J1TxxC
 fsj+5za29an+LK2U4Cs6Kj749wKx+0BbJr5YhAiTSZmvwL5Eu4gIM15YuNag+C082m6BUl
 V1PLAsRaHDz+sTOgRIPGeXTqVdwwM6G1gRVQduwnm0qk3wh122eH1tir9Hv7esWq7yWF0W
 CN/eLU1T3REGR/oZgGmqfDopj8MWgdDP3KBJvumP9wo+mUQXN2UH3/3LdhAnWcsw3MVprI
 r+njUFfG2QNG1YS8xF322aPG5u7RyPFLf6y0B741zUFiFe1igWU162rzbmXmLtmN6a4B+M
 53+yXdc0JWrCkuqEaldJlZATghXP7oE/62kIomejpzRDT6XzlhmnPndg==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5da9a937
 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:42:23 +0100
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
Message-ID: <87pmqlemse.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  merge 50512 46038 50123 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [80.241.217.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

merge 50512 46038 50123

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYaI2IQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15mz0A/A0rKwsXmwBzfqRDON1DbVf1OLF1CoUtIh0WV2Fn
11EAAQD+//y6XzP04eKOjzq2tLFPQUcId1IHwLPmHQyvqg3DAQ==
=qh5g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 13:46:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 27 08:46:23 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mqy23-0001GJ-Kf
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:46:23 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:45618)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1mqy21-0001EI-DD
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:46:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=XSdncDZ2J20Ou
 JlERP3tFQXJl6F0Qkpkx1l7lgCgT+Q=; h=date:to:from; d=tobias.gr;
 b=RoVwdw
 qOvq1nLme15ZqSqZWb9xlDN65ZmQNSgVgAy+fFOd8xOA3sShJL1FqtuAUIkC38H5OgM4FM
 Qe+/1XKeRHdp2Yvj9GcRRIIQMcZdyRXXdbE7hSlEScdbPq3ZrZmh0BDrBjyFC5r+GmexFU
 dr9ujqNyacS6uBCGLLQnX2hk3+HDgwJV4R0uj3mfsL/iDNgoVrdQwtrg8Wgp37Ynj0SsOS
 DHcXjIpUPIpmymcROQWkGyTojgpi5UG0iVI6WS3U7esXaLVU0wDu1/5dKB7c1YbnptFte1
 2YDboZl0AB56hA4QqbvRZHO1NPy6rvr7AFko8jrI/ZBGEAWmgV+3nAYA==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dce001f0
 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:46:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:44:57 +0100
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
Message-ID: <87lf19emo8.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: retitle 46038 Tests assume UTF-8 locale (specifically
 tests/channels.scm)
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [80.241.217.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

retitle 46038 Tests assume UTF-8 locale (specifically 
tests/channels.scm)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYaI2tw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15EEoA/3qxXm1mPe8GfWVzKTtBnbejRhX9/fEhF7SFwzq/
Z9DkAQDjtyonF5c9Nr2UegR8UVZxiIsDnsqw2XRGtuhCoFA6Dg==
=H+zU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 13:57:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 27 08:57:53 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mqyDB-0002a8-1q
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:57:53 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:45620)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1mqyD8-0002a0-Et
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:57:52 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=72XC7JLuAUV9E
 9tfqwgEQPB3jmPIZGfKNnCyXvOg4G0=; h=date:to:from; d=tobias.gr;
 b=jiA+i7
 a3AMCsMDQiQkFKBZQX3FFBiSULlSh7/wRjmuRkAC2iHY8t2T9T/K8mhe5mE7z98/GtywX3
 R/DBwfafgAU/pRJ0g59kH/Q5+tpp4hWombNkDQZp6LM9/JylwOzkg3bHTdBMvkuZG8ReRs
 h6RtCWI9fzpRd09SdkLV5JPI3ItOf7DYh8R+59G5JXDNvhjacZUXCf0Bsykpf0L4ggIBhN
 UegRsCf8c5ZJBijP0jZtGUJqUHjWP75QiTMEnMcsbfbcIN3cQQn6W5ClawZE8A7SzDINyq
 PZzFNPTYr/XgOK2AsjNc+YZHD0YfU9u1PUChuPE+61hquJr/c9bjX2fQ==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2b7a8b53
 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:57:37 +0100
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
Message-ID: <87h7bxem53.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: retitle 46038 Tests (tests/channels.scm) assume UTF-8 locale
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [80.241.217.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

retitle 46038 Tests (tests/channels.scm) assume UTF-8 locale

Last modified: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.