GNU bug report logs - #46220
Fwd: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guile; Reported by: bug-guile@HIDDEN; dated Sun, 31 Jan 2021 21:31:01 UTC; Maintainer for guile is bug-guile@HIDDEN.

Message received at 46220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 46220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2021 18:30:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 02 13:30:14 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lH9mg-00086n-Gz
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 13:30:14 -0500
Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:33218)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1lH9mc-0007zZ-91
 for 46220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 13:30:12 -0500
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d])
 by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id bWW72400Y0mfAB401WW8oR; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3c00deee4082fe28fa9fd442ecf7239d049c5333.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:30:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <eee99a01c43dec23cd119f71b9a9758c7986aceb.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <eee99a01c43dec23cd119f71b9a9758c7986aceb.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MCyErvNH2IBMZSF2a0eP"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21;
 t=1614709808; bh=C/q3IKiz2cYYmz0FG7heEgEsAOCmRsa1OJwpn7flEdc=;
 h=Subject:From:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=fcBdkwwRCo3VIByEBbpks4OATA4Wy855reaaVZdk8kUReIawfX27+GmfVeMPrM/Vm
 x2um5r1SAFr6AhcoNDu0etxInkv7YAVE5MXdHUGltz/yhlHD2VVyc4kegYxizLNfZe
 s+jAxdr5MjmAM5BC2I/yFYsS22L+1QcY7clynPHJPigoNju/EnOdM5PLV3Z8YzD3l6
 ozuCLquxM/QG49sK8qdw+BVtg533KAGasdeGTKUbZjsP+2Zh972xJotwkpLTn+/ksI
 ecb2iLo6xSypf9Gk/Lc8y+9FVyp6Bl0FYWGYOENHtDh6mI4s+/O5f6uNdTQyMTitso
 V+N+//fXMw4tQ==
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hi guilers, Attached is a patch that exports O_NOFOLLOW &
 others when available. While testing, I found some weirdness (kernel: Linux).
 $ ./meta/build-env guile scheme@(guile-user)> O_NOFOLLOW $1 = 131072
 scheme@(guile-user)>
 O_NOTRANS $2 = 0 scheme@(guile-user)> O_LARGEFILE $3 = 0 
 Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [195.130.132.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [195.130.132.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (maximedevos[at]telenet.be)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 1.0 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL     Bad headers on message from free email
 service
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46220
Cc: 46220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)


--=-MCyErvNH2IBMZSF2a0eP
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-pyreMU6uFuiuBXnI6ze/"


--=-pyreMU6uFuiuBXnI6ze/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi guilers,

Attached is a patch that exports O_NOFOLLOW & others
when available.  While testing, I found some weirdness
(kernel: Linux).

$ ./meta/build-env guile
scheme@(guile-user)> O_NOFOLLOW
$1 =3D 131072
scheme@(guile-user)> O_NOTRANS
$2 =3D 0
scheme@(guile-user)> O_LARGEFILE
$3 =3D 0

O_NOFOLLOW is exported as expected.  O_NOTRANS is exported,
even though on the Linux kernel (O_NOTRANS is Hurd-specific).
O_LARGEFILE is 0, which could be correct I suppose, but if
files are opened in large file mode by default I don't really
see a point in defining O_LARGEFILE.

This seems orthogonal to this bug (well, feature request), though.

Greetings,
Maxime.

--=-pyreMU6uFuiuBXnI6ze/
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename*0=0001-Define-O_NOFOLLOW-and-various-other-flags-when-suppo.pat;
	filename*1=ch
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
	name="0001-Define-O_NOFOLLOW-and-various-other-flags-when-suppo.patch";
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--=-pyreMU6uFuiuBXnI6ze/--

--=-MCyErvNH2IBMZSF2a0eP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYD6EKRccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7kE8AQCIMqC1Akib9QhhhHEvJQPfNuqC
37vd83zt/qpqQzWsZQD/RG8pKR/5kty/cNXNjnE+bO7n2CgsGy0EpQ4s+WacXwE=
=5vik
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-MCyErvNH2IBMZSF2a0eP--





Information forwarded to bug-guile@HIDDEN:
bug#46220; Package guile. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2021 21:30:43 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 31 16:30:43 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1l6KIs-0006t6-Dm
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:43 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36338)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1l6KIq-0006sy-6T
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:41 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47140)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>)
 id 1l6KIp-0000BS-Lg
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:39 -0500
Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19]:48332)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>)
 id 1l6KIn-0002nh-CR
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:39 -0500
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d])
 by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id PZWY2400Z0mfAB401ZWZwZ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:30:33 +0100
Message-ID: <308932c261a6f953a498606fb45cb35e08988af5.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Fwd: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:30:22 +0100
References: <eee99a01c43dec23cd119f71b9a9758c7986aceb.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21;
 t=1612128633; bh=8x5zR5xX3adGcyUcQSK8UqG4S8OTEx7G8KbK8SDeHVk=;
 h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:References;
 b=O/lh/8HtGAxjfBPtyGNwLyjU/4RFwC1urhcgU7nvukUDXvhrfIyO65Q0/7YbAXPVE
 VQ48SmUQdWohJwXxbBxos4mjkZt2xKg0/O9zv64t3kFkrOS6v6AQZNQ9reoUe+jPkf
 vesYDlHufrmSn27s9acl2AURmnKFhQCspwt8cPp2YVCW4MsH4PiwO4r89aGKwan5ZN
 nyVN8Mdf3bIvfT0k4ZqzVuiNN4quv1EqpXOg7uIGatstrGfj10NvctoUT+P/JMDm51
 qnmeckXbXvpGn8c0BxJC24w1u6l8g8SSOhZGxYg9KDQqZJFzKZ/I+VxAay6FNYKfcg
 oWUUDdNJD/87Q==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19;
 envelope-from=maximedevos@HIDDEN; helo=laurent.telenet-ops.be
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


--=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3"


--=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi guilers,

I've accidentally sent the message to guile-devel instead
of bug-guile.  The bug report is forwarded here.

--=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94?= Some
 non-standard O_* flags are missing
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Message-ID: <eee99a01c43dec23cd119f71b9a9758c7986aceb.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: guile-devel@HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:13:10 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2
MIME-Version: 1.0


--=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi guilers,

I noticed the following open flags are not defined:
O_NOFOLLOW, O_TMPFILE, O_IGNORE_CTTY, O_NOLINK,
O_SHLOCK, O_EXLOCK, O_ASYNC, O_NOATIME.

Some of these are Hurd-specific, Linux-specific
and BSD-specific.  I'm particularily interested
in O_NOFOLLOW, O_TMPFILE, O_IGNORE_CTTY, O_NOLINK
and O_NOATIME, the others don't matter for me,
though they may be useful for others.

Could extra O_* flags be exported to Guile (in libguile/filesys.c)
on systems where they are defined?

Greetings,
Maxime
--=20
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
PGP Key: C1F3 3EE2 0C52 8FDB 7DD7  011F 49E3 EE22 1917 25EE
Freenode handle: mdevos

--=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYBcdZhccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7j8zAQCUR1roSnNX+QkjDkWTu3cfRblc
lz7tecpIhsZEm2w+BwD+KB1oyjmtqzrZAfFdGm9ywrWvK09Owuw0BGuXGSfkKg0=
=BVzM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v--

--=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3--

--=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYBchbhccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7hXDAP91T6H5/F6f8YKE0cU94lAVwwWZ
UHdkHjLeFjPDDF0krQEAxdzjOdFBcncayrCv8utJz0QZxkKHzGQ1k6FtRNla1wk=
=JWSb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC--





Acknowledgement sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guile@HIDDEN:
bug#46220; Package guile. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.