GNU bug report logs - #46237
[PATCH] Add new jplephem

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:02:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46237 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46237 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46237; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add new jplephem
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:01:24 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Guix team!

I continue adding astronomy packages.
Is it better to put Python packages to python-science or it's ok to
keep them in astronomy?
-- 
… наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.

[0001-gnu-Add-jplephem.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent to Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 07 Feb 2021 09:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 07 Feb 2021 09:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 46237-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46237-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46237] [PATCH] Add new jplephem
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:24:50 +0100

Hello,

Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Is it better to put Python packages to python-science or it's ok to
> keep them in astronomy?

I think "astronomy.scm" is fine.

> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add jplephem
>
> * gnu/packages/astronomy.scm (python-jplephem): New variable

Applied. Thank you!

> +;;; Python based packages completely related to Astronomy

I removed this comment since I think it might add burden to packagers.
IMO, alphabetical or random (!) sorting are fine, but sub-categories in
a module is a bit too much for package definitions.

> +    (description
> +     "Use a JPL ephemeris to predict planet positions.")

I expounded the description a bit, following README from repository.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 43 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.