GNU bug report logs - #46366
[PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:19:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46366 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46366 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46366; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>
To: "guix-patches <at> gnu.org" <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000
I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway.  Here's an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.

Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix.  Fairly unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my patches merged.  Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.

I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.  It's working for now.  Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS support anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.


From 566c4aa9104b5866d15c53340d9b68e0960c49bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:47:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.

* gnu/packages/file-systems.scm (zfs): Update to 2.0.2.
---
 gnu/packages/file-systems.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
index e6ee645be0..caf190d8ba 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ APFS.")
 (define-public zfs
   (package
     (name "zfs")
-    (version "2.0.1")
+    (version "2.0.2")
     (outputs '("out" "module" "src"))
     (source
       (origin
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ APFS.")
                               "/download/zfs-" version
                               "/zfs-" version ".tar.gz"))
           (sha256
-           (base32 "0y3992l4nzr67q18lz1kizw0za1shvqbpmsjz9shv4frh5ihllbi"))))
+           (base32 "090b2pp0cgzkjcnbjf8ms28dah5dff8s04q31z62czapwiy0drdx"))))
     (build-system linux-module-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(;; The ZFS kernel module should not be downloaded since the license
--
2.30.0





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46366; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 07 Feb 2021 17:08:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 46366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout <at> zaclys.net>
To: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>,
 46366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 18:06:57 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 15:18 +0000, raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches
via wrote:
> I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but
> anyway.
> Fairly unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real
> interest in getting my patches merged.  Posting here just in case
> somebody actually gets interested.

I am interested by ZFS on GNU Guix but I am not sure I understand
Scheme enough to review your patches. Also, it makes it a bit confusing
that your patches are submitted as several separate bugs. I think it
would make it easier to review if they were all summed into a single
"ZFS on GNU Guix System" bug. Otherwise I think it will take a bit of
patience, I'm sure you've seen the amount of pending patches, we're
near a thousand by now. Lots of things to review, limited time.

All in all, just remember that I am very enthusiastic about ZFS on GNU
Guix! I'm sure lots of people are.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46366; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:24:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 46366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
To: 46366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 00:23:42 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Me either!

I've got zfs farm on Proxmox 2x dell servers 10TB each. Guix definitely
benefits of having it on board!
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46366; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:53:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>,
 46366-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:51:56 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi raid5atemyhomework,

On Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000
raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway.  Here's an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.
> 
> Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix.  Fairly unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my patches merged.  Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.
> 
> I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.  It's working for now.  Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS support anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.

I totally understand.

It's frustrating when well-tested complete patches get unanswered for several
weeks--it happened to me before.

In any case, I've asked whether someone who knows how to create a profile
in a service can finally review your patches.

I'm sorry.

Pushed the update of the zfs package to 2.0.2 to guix master as
commit 5424ca6d6e01672bf7304a4144b05a98852adbab.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 43 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.