GNU bug report logs - #46423
27.1; Ultimate proof that *Article* and *Summary* use different charsets

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46423 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46423 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 27.1; Ultimate proof that *Article* and *Summary* use different
 charsets
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:49:40 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Here C-u g shows us the actual bytes in the *Article* buffer,
which you will recognize are UTF-8. Whereas the same bytes become
different bytes in the *Summary* buffer. We are talking about cases when
a raw UTF-8 Subject has arrived.

[Z.jpg (image/jpeg, inline)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Here are the correct bytes:
$ echo 民國|hd
00000000  e6 b0 91 e5 9c 8b 0a

Yes, with plain g, the article looks great in the *Article* buffer, but
still one big mess in the *Summary* buffer.

In .overview, the line is UTF-8, but there are other non-UTF-8 lines in
.overview, probably causing the whole file to be assumed non-UTF-8 by
emacs as we discussed earlier.
https://www.jidanni.org/comp/configuration/

Message #8 received at 46423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 46423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#46423: 27.1; Ultimate proof that *Article* and *Summary*
 use different charsets
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:53:52 +0100

積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

> Here C-u g shows us the actual bytes in the *Article* buffer,
> which you will recognize are UTF-8. Whereas the same bytes become
> different bytes in the *Summary* buffer. We are talking about cases when
> a raw UTF-8 Subject has arrived.

You've reported this before, and it has been fixed in Emacs 28.

Could you, for the love of all that is Emacs, stop sending these
repetetive bug reports?  Please?

Closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.