GNU bug report logs - #46496
newlib-nano doesn't have libc_nano.a

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Nala Ginrut <mulei <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 19:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46496 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46496 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#46496; Package guix. (Sat, 13 Feb 2021 19:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Nala Ginrut <mulei <at> gnu.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 13 Feb 2021 19:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nala Ginrut <mulei <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: newlib-nano doesn't have libc_nano.a 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 03:11:07 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I can't build ZephyrRTOS with arm-none-eabi-nano-toolchain,
because libc_nano.a is required by ZephyrRTOS when I enabled newlib nano
config.
Then I found there's only libc_nano.a in newlib-nano path, only libc.a.

I think libc.a is for newlib, and libc_nano.a is for newlib-nano.


Best regards.


-- 
GNU Powered it
GPL Protected it
GOD Blessed it
HFG - NalaGinrut
Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Nala Ginrut <mulei <at> gnu.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 46496-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
To: 46496-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Bug closed
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:39:31 -0400
Hello!

Thank you for reporting this bug. This bug was fixed in commit
8799369983315d799501b4f45a3954195b630ebb made on April 8th.

You are correct that libc_nano.a should be for newlib-nano and libc.a
should be for newlib. However, in the nano toolchain, both libc.a and
libc_nano.a (which was recently added) are used for newlib-nano.

In the future, we should combine the nano and non-nano toolchain
together so that it matches up with your (correct) intuition of what
should be where. But that is a job for another day.

Thanks,

Morgan




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 14 May 2021 11:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 340 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.