GNU bug report logs - #46567
[PATCH 0/1] imagemagick: update to latest 6.x.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46567 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46567 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46567; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: Guix Patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] imagemagick: update to latest 6.x.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:18:55 +0100
The latest 6.x is 6.9.12-0.

I dunno the status of dependents wrt 7.x.

-- 
Vincent Legoll




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46567; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: imagemagick: Update to 6.9.12-0.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:32:43 +0100
* gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm (imagemagick): Update to 6.9.12-0.
---
 gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm b/gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm
index 02a627f17e..2ca0cfc9ea 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm
@@ -50,14 +50,14 @@
     ;; The 7 release series has an incompatible API, while the 6 series is still
     ;; maintained. Don't update to 7 until we've made sure that the ImageMagick
     ;; users are ready for the 7-series API.
-    (version "6.9.11-48")
+    (version "6.9.12-0")
     (source (origin
              (method url-fetch)
              (uri (string-append "mirror://imagemagick/ImageMagick-"
                                  version ".tar.xz"))
              (sha256
               (base32
-               "0m8nkmywkqwyrr01q7aiakj6mi4rb2psjgzv8n0x82x3s1rpfyql"))))
+               "0bdc6rn14xxlvylck9yzr0mgx5dps3pdyfsgy91wxs64ck0kaahf"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(#:configure-flags '("--with-frozenpaths" "--without-gcc-arch"
-- 
2.30.0





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46567; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:31:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46567] [PATCH 0/1] imagemagick: update to latest 6.x.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:29:44 -0500
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:18:55PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> The latest 6.x is 6.9.12-0.
> 
> I dunno the status of dependents wrt 7.x.

In Guix we don't have a package of ImageMagick 7, and the upstream
developers continue supporting "legacy" ImageMagick 6. We have packaged
ImageMagick 7 in the past at least once.

Basically, if we want to use version 7, we should do some tests to
ensure that packages using ImageMagick are compatible. Unfortunately
ImageMagick uses a so-called "command-line API" so it's not simple to
check compatibility. The easiest way would be to wait for the upstream
developers of packages that use ImageMagick to announce compaitibility
(maybe some of them have already done this, I don't know).




Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 46567-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46567-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46567] [PATCH] gnu: imagemagick: Update to 6.9.12-0.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:31:41 -0500
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:32:43PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> * gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm (imagemagick): Update to 6.9.12-0.

Thanks! Pushed to staging as 98a41305cca3413c6d0b98e9c02caddc9138353e




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#46567; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:58:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 46567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46567] [PATCH 0/1] imagemagick: update to latest 6.x.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:57:40 +0100
Hello,

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:29 PM Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:18:55PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> > I dunno the status of dependents wrt 7.x.
>
> In Guix we don't have a package of ImageMagick 7, and the upstream
> developers continue supporting "legacy" ImageMagick 6. We have packaged
> ImageMagick 7 in the past at least once.
>
> Basically, if we want to use version 7, we should do some tests to
> ensure that packages using ImageMagick are compatible. Unfortunately
> ImageMagick uses a so-called "command-line API" so it's not simple to
> check compatibility. The easiest way would be to wait for the upstream
> developers of packages that use ImageMagick to announce compaitibility
> (maybe some of them have already done this, I don't know).

Yes, I've seen the comment, I was just trying to tell that I did not check
any dependent for 7.x compatibility.

Thanks

-- 
Vincent Legoll




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 33 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.