GNU bug report logs -
#46663
[Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article
Previous Next
Reported by: Epholys <epholys <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:03:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 46663 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 46663 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#46663
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Epholys <epholys <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I want to report a missing resource on the web page:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
The link [full graph] redirects to a 404:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg
---
Thomas Munoz
Reply sent
to
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Epholys <epholys <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 46663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:03PM +0100, Epholys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to report a missing resource on the web page:
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
>
>
> The link [full graph] redirects to a 404:
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg
Thank you for reporting! Fixed as
6361ba930f94d7c0f7f0265ff63c97d300c57067.
The website will rebuild soon to include the fix.
Closing.
Regards,
Florian
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#46663
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 46663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:22:16 +0100
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:03PM +0100, Epholys wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to report a missing resource on the web page:
> > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
> >
> >
> > The link [full graph] redirects to a 404:
> > https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg
> >
>
> Thank you for reporting! Fixed as
> 6361ba930f94d7c0f7f0265ff63c97d300c57067.
>
> The website will rebuild soon to include the fix.
>
> Closing.
>
> Regards,
> Florian
>
>
>
Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be
worth setting up if not.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#46663
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 46663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be
> worth setting up if not.
You made me check for other broken links using wget on a local build
of the website. Indeed there were some more broken links. Thanks!
However I am too lazy to try to set up automatic and continuous broken
link checking. I think me and others should just be more careful when
moving things around.
Regards,
Florian
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#46663
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 25 Feb 2021 02:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 46663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On +2021-02-24 18:58:38 +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> > Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be
> > worth setting up if not.
>
> You made me check for other broken links using wget on a local build
> of the website. Indeed there were some more broken links. Thanks!
>
> However I am too lazy to try to set up automatic and continuous broken
> link checking. I think me and others should just be more careful when
> moving things around.
>
> Regards,
> Florian
>
>
>
I couldn't believe this is not a stardard tool for web site maintainers,
so i put
web broken link lister
to duckduckgo and got lots of hits. Well, tl;dr -- having other concerns
at the moment, but at least I felt my hunch validated. I bet it gets
re-invented a lot :-p
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:24:11 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 32 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.