X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: [bug#47238] [PATCH] services: mcron: Export procedures for shepherd service Resent-From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.47238.B.16160798091270 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47238 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16160798091270 (code B ref -1); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:04:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2021 15:03:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lMuBN-0000KQ-Jn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:03:29 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lMuBL-0000KI-IV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:03:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lMuBL-00070h-9T for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:03:27 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:54960 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lMuBI-0006vw-Vj for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:03:27 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1616079798; bh=YUBlOTOoXK2/OA2tkyJf2QzRrQqVc1Xufqf6g72HPEw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=OgQA4FoCHI/tdXwM22B7I0WI+OXHfmpKCxEljJYWXMrIRXAz4eHruIyo7UVxnZBLF CL8zaz2Qm3e7A/G9Cb0JTcwyGYpAwU8TIbz7J2/2zidPjbKCTSNyRsbwPbrfNz7Bfg 9QEu+uYu2LYFjGE5J/SoOw2gK/YA1b6GByojxC1E= Message-Id: <56019d274a5eaa54ce4d596550f1a96ec490bb39.1616079573.git.public@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:03:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@HIDDEN; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=0.001, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/services/mcron.scm (job-files): Export procedure. (shepherd-schedule-action): Likewise. --- I am going to write an mcron service for `guix home`[1] so users can run cron jobs for syncing mail, b [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) * gnu/services/mcron.scm (job-files): Export procedure. (shepherd-schedule-action): Likewise. --- I am going to write an mcron service for `guix home`[1] so users can run cron jobs for syncing mail, backups etc. It would be nice to be able to use these two procedures to avoid code duplication. [1]: https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/878s6u2pco.fsf@HIDDEN gnu/services/mcron.scm | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/services/mcron.scm b/gnu/services/mcron.scm index bd4e6e7410..982af08596 100644 --- a/gnu/services/mcron.scm +++ b/gnu/services/mcron.scm @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ mcron-configuration-mcron mcron-configuration-jobs + job-files + shepherd-schedule-action + mcron-service-type mcron-service)) base-commit: 9783645ee8eaf9c33ce952131e692fb2ff47ffc9 -- 2.31.0
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#47238: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] services: mcron: Export procedures for shepherd service) Message-ID: <handler.47238.B.16160798091270.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <56019d274a5eaa54ce4d596550f1a96ec490bb39.1616079573.git.public@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 47238 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:04:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): guix-patches@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 47238: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D47238 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: [bug#47238] [PATCH] services: mcron: Export procedures for shepherd service Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.47238.B47238.161696232232588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47238 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> Cc: 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47238-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B47238.161696232232588 (code B ref 47238); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 20:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 47238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 20:12:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lQblR-0008TT-Vo for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:12:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQblP-0008TD-MI for 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:12:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQblJ-0005r9-Mi; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:11:53 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=44476 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQblJ-0004kZ-3I; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:11:53 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> References: <56019d274a5eaa54ce4d596550f1a96ec490bb39.1616079573.git.public@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:11:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <56019d274a5eaa54ce4d596550f1a96ec490bb39.1616079573.git.public@HIDDEN> (Xinglu Chen's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:03:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87wntrt4vs.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> skribis: > * gnu/services/mcron.scm (job-files): Export procedure. > (shepherd-schedule-action): Likewise. > --- > I am going to write an mcron service for `guix home`[1] so users can run > cron jobs for synci [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi, Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> skribis: > * gnu/services/mcron.scm (job-files): Export procedure. > (shepherd-schedule-action): Likewise. > --- > I am going to write an mcron service for `guix home`[1] so users can run > cron jobs for syncing mail, backups etc. It would be nice to be able to > use these two procedures to avoid code duplication. > > [1]: https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/878s6u2pco.fsf@HIDDEN I=E2=80=99m often reluctant to exposing more than what=E2=80=99s strictly n= ecessary because that can then complicate maintenance work=E2=80=94we now have to ex= tra bindings to maintain. In this case, it=E2=80=99s definitely not the end of the world, but I wonde= r if there are other ways we could achieve what you have in mind. For instance, could Guix Home reuse =E2=80=98mcron-service-type=E2=80=99 as is?= Or, with an eye on getting Guix Home into Guix proper, are there some minimal changes we could make to accommodate that? (I have yet to play with Guix Home and to look at the implementation=E2=80= =A6) Ludo=E2=80=99.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: [bug#47238] [PATCH] services: mcron: Export procedures for shepherd service Resent-From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.47238.B47238.161696711115585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47238 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Cc: 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47238-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B47238.161696711115585 (code B ref 47238); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 47238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 21:31:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lQd0h-00043J-5k for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:31:51 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:37556 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <public@HIDDEN>) id 1lQd0f-000436-Ns for 47238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:31:50 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen <public@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1616967103; bh=X6fdSBC+YARTWvYfuYioy7bptVnmkHQ78/8JcYm9EOs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=FVc2co3c1aG17/v81+CAfcJfAmoM4rle22SvWrB4ZmBz+Nwn2Zci6hFmEUEk7XokL SRB1yLA7QkPMU5x0mG3TWmpabLkfPB9t5ROeln4Fib9gh0BHO8XCV+ihbVs55POg4B hsW/bZj4iRYtVzxpZzWP7Cl716NgygzRSJg//tuc= In-Reply-To: <87wntrt4vs.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <56019d274a5eaa54ce4d596550f1a96ec490bb39.1616079573.git.public@HIDDEN> <87wntrt4vs.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2e7m0ch.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Mar 28 2021, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= wrote: > =?UTF-8?Q?I=E2=80=99m?= often reluctant to exposing more than =?UTF-8?Q?what=E2=80=99s?= strictly necessary > because that can then complicate maintenance =?UTF-8?Q?work=E2=80=94we?= now have to extra > bindings to maintain. Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Mar 28 2021, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= wrote: > =?UTF-8?Q?I=E2=80=99m?= often reluctant to exposing more than =?UTF-8?Q?what=E2=80=99s?= strictly necessary > because that can then complicate maintenance =?UTF-8?Q?work=E2=80=94we?= now have to extra > bindings to maintain. Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD On Sun, Mar 28 2021, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I=E2=80=99m often reluctant to exposing more than what=E2=80=99s strictly= necessary > because that can then complicate maintenance work=E2=80=94we now have to = extra > bindings to maintain. Yeah, that's understandable. > In this case, it=E2=80=99s definitely not the end of the world, but I won= der if > there are other ways we could achieve what you have in mind. For > instance, could Guix Home reuse =E2=80=98mcron-seevice-type=E2=80=99 as i= s? Right now all the service names are prefixed 'home-' to avoid name clashes, though, maybe this could be changed in the future. For now I have just copied the definition of the procedures to Guix Home. > Or, with an eye on getting Guix Home into Guix proper, are there some > minimal changes we could make to accommodate that? We are currently mostly focused on implementing some basic services (e.g. Bash, GnuPG, Git). After that we will probably invite some volunteers to test it on their machines to get some more feedback. Once the basic services have been implemented and the documentation is complete I think it would be appropriate to discuss merging Guix Home to Guix proper, and probably refactor some stuff. > (I have yet to play with Guix Home and to look at the implementation=E2= =80=A6) There is a quickstart guide[1] on getting it up and running and we also have a mailing list if you want to discuss things[2]. Andrew recently made a video on the progress so far, and he touched a little on the plan for the upcomming weeks/months. Happy to see more people interested in Guix Home! [1]: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde/tree/master/item/gnu/README [2]: https://lists.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde-devel [3]: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3DZaXHtSKKoeg
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2024 14:15:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 31 10:15:36 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rqvyC-0001W2-Dx for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:15:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1rqvy9-0001VD-S6 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:15:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1rqvy0-00058d-HE for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:15:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to: references; bh=6H4X6ZQ62hl8Hvo9ud0jHGudtdnVJbf4mHVUN99Wakw=; b=ZsBwvqP0nt05A4 tdmuoq7ywhDGBZo022Kg0vrtCFDgEzCWvkM97NtYTS3r7zcQPstlfD41kTNtrS1OfzcrnAhGZoRHx j3XusgLgMkj7N+X0IztWg2nbHdCmmEaUc/BwUCYcycOEZoPOalIXDMMEuSiwEcmrHbZA9FdBTSw1n BJAwmWL24iFaVcbFAuBvz7ZIaU54KLul6MvQzc0m9vOIazAElyDPmXVPYn9szCes03v+MvquptRV4 M6YD16x1bQrjLCoPZ+xuSb4orQuf1+p6PTrH6IAvHnz3xqhnW0RHMMaRZGKeTUJKO1ANqxRwGafow S02LLFuOuQ0/F93ji1nw==; Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 16:15:19 +0200 Message-Id: <874jcmfpxk.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #47238 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 47238 quit
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.