GNU bug report logs - #47250
[PATCH] Some crates-io updates

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47250 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47250 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net>
To: Guix Patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Some crates-io updates
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:10:30 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Needed these updated for Supertag, which I'll send a patch for Soon TM.
guix refresh says none of them have many dependents, but I'm not sure
if it can handle the weird #:cargo-inputs thing, so maybe some of these
should not go to master? Not sure.

[0001-gnu-Updated-rust-libc-to-0.2.89.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0002-gnu-Updated-rust-standback-to-0.2.15.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0003-gnu-Updated-rust-time-to-0.2.26.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0004-gnu-Updated-rust-time-macros-to-0.1.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 47250-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: 47250-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#47250] [PATCH] Some crates-io updates
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:27:32 +0100

raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net> writes:

> Needed these updated for Supertag, which I'll send a patch for Soon TM.
> guix refresh says none of them have many dependents, but I'm not sure
> if it can handle the weird #:cargo-inputs thing, so maybe some of these
> should not go to master? Not sure.

Guix contains greater versions on the crates updated in this patch set.
Closing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.