Received: (at 47480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 21:37:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 29 17:37:53 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lQza5-0006oe-5y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQza3-0006oP-EL for 47480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQzZy-000860-7b; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:46 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50142 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lQzZx-0004pw-NF; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:46 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch References: <CAJ3okZ3C7wgsuYAiD4mOA0wuMxsCfHtKg4hqF_=o1vyzAAa5Cw@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:37:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3C7wgsuYAiD4mOA0wuMxsCfHtKg4hqF_=o1vyzAAa5Cw@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7ktljyv.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47480 Cc: 47480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is > really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not > notice whereas people building from source do. Could you send a diff of the two tarballs? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#47480; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 17:15:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 29 13:15:05 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lQvTl-0004iW-Dz for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lQvTj-0004iO-9U for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lQvTj-0002cW-44 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]:46954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lQvTd-00076Q-Ut for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:02 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id j17so6789364qvo.13 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=KP9+Nt0tc1R+qySrFvSEtjJhbkBo5LfFGnBQmlA50ZL7WbRZ7NCXPdBfQ96OxE1FFV 6Ii6XtqXu4Ipal59w+Kzu+ACYcodPoEf+qBjGDqz2d2Veu7k4MC6jOeq3rwoAxeLgfpo aef6qzwsxdic9mWU06J1PUkrKt3mm4Ec2Z7mD4sBbZzSKLhQ4ypzuaDZJlUCXcIEbJMu pyYwG/6zPOvGJ7z1RIgYq0RnXBcO6YApOB3jjbryGCmXgM+HitrApKDvJkoSeLvTGvRD 1K638iWawFEn568BtRB7VOg0W8VNXghUWJhryHWfrEH/xFnuK/ktOIiQcwacTJ/8Ena5 N/Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=NVNXQ2WFWgTIp+Ldr1iK+uaUSE/2GlDRX8wnnoCHGzCfz/kYCxsCPKxjTcuagLtS4A WREBykBIPt/IhXT3SEuX4tAOmJmuBuWIcntg8c00ku1WFu5vdoBN0dJQQ9WtvcoaIWpS XGjzEhHyKfbLJUUihZXUm3BmVJq7sKoUpfSYA8DY1bLVsAcLsjImx10OHH/lfv7xItqN pR6S9vlirlwj6zFDA4xkqFT0aiSdGLhsTfDZO8VEH0LevANM8jyJ61u/XvjYpAEbdepF 3k1FASvm0e+8vaC9FVdlpxqXmxb6v/+4RR+QJuW5zB5bQ5atQhCHafJN0Lnd+jQMn/0A +6Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aVLe5zgJc4xo2W5l0XlqGm2Z3Eb0mzxrQMDsSrKbMnpdefCEC 2C+sxVgvhYY3YOXq3Y48kf/vraZ6bjk/JsRZoRz4DEeD+h0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwojrrNo5jlgGfVlkO4l0gQ8tw4mxchb5Kr+vBh7OIbIFIAJsypR3nyGZQ+wSbOGhkC6Y4qPFps6knC+G5p5O4= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4991:: with SMTP id t17mr25857116qvx.33.1617038096912; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3C7wgsuYAiD4mOA0wuMxsCfHtKg4hqF_=o1vyzAAa5Cw@HIDDEN> Subject: gprolog: hash mismatch To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qv1-xf35.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, Using Guix 55685e4, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix build -S --no-substitutes gprolog The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv building /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv... Starting download of /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 50.1MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz: expected hash: 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z actual hash: 18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz' build of /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/yj/rcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv.bz2'. guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv' failed $ guix build -S gprolog substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% 3.6 MB will be downloaded: /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz substituting /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 5.9MiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0% /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not notice whereas people building from source do. All the best, simon
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#47480; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.