GNU bug report logs - #47537
specification->package does not seem to support outputs

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 06:20:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47537 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47537 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#47537; Package guix. (Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:20:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:20:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com>
To: "bug-guix <at> gnu.org" <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: specification->package does not seem to support outputs
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:50:09 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

An example of this behavior in a guile repl is:

(use-modules (gnu packages))
(specification->package "qemu") ; works
(specification->package "qemu:doc") ; errors and closes the repl

(specification->package+output "qemu:doc") ; works as expected

Thank you!
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#47537; Package guix. (Thu, 01 Apr 2021 10:20:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com>, 47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: specification->package does not seem to support outputs
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:19:03 +0200
Hello,

Am Donnerstag, den 01.04.2021, 03:50 +0000 schrieb fsdfsdfsd3:
> Hello,
> 
> An example of this behavior in a guile repl is:
> 
> (use-modules (gnu packages))
> (specification->package "qemu")  ; works
> (specification->package "qemu:doc")  ; errors and closes the repl
Given its docstring, that's to be expected:

    Return a package matching SPEC.  SPEC may be a package name, or a
    package name followed by an at-sign and a version number.  If the 
    version number is not present, return the preferred newest version.

> (specification->package+output "qemu:doc") ; works as expected
In other words, use specification->package+output ;)

Regards,
Leo





Added tag(s) notabug. Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com> Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#47537; Package guix. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: fsdfsdfsd3 <fsdfsdfsd3 <at> protonmail.com>
To: "47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#47537 acknowledged by developer (control message for bug
 #47537)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:06:29 +0000
Hello,

I ended up testing my config file with nfs4 and that part did work fine. I had earlier errors unrelated to this that threw me off thinking that would not work.

To clarify then, the issue here only seems to be with the mount function in the (guix build syscalls) module. This results in a "NO route to host" error even though mount.nfs works fine on the command line.

However perhaps I am assuming that mount.nfs does not make use of nfs4 behind the scenes, even without nfs-utils installed, when it does.

Thank you!

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, April 2, 2021 1:17 AM, <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
> #47537: specification->package does not seem to support outputs,
> which was filed against the guix package.
>
> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed.
> You can view the full report at
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=47537
>
> If you require further information, please followup to 47537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> debbugs.gnu.org maintainers
> (administrator, GNU bugs database)






bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 13 May 2021 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 320 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.