GNU bug report logs - #47583
libtool no-suppress evaluated incorrectly

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47583 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47583 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Michal Ambroz" <rebus <at> seznam.cz>
To: <bug-libtool <at> gnu.org>
Subject: libtool no-suppress evaluated incorrectly
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 17:35:54 +0200 (CEST)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,
I believe it is bug that the "-no-suppress" option for is evaluated
depending on the possition in the agruments for the --mode=compile.

This doesn't work:

$ /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile -no-suppress gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_
H -I. -I..   -D _GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_
LARGE_FILES -pipe -D _GNU_SOURCE -I../include -Werror -Wall -g -O2 -flto=
auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -
Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -
specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -
specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -
fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -
Wstrict-prototypes -c -o emu.lo emu.c



Usage: /home/mambroz/rpmbuild/BUILD/libemu-ab48695b7113db692982a1839e3d6eb9e
73e90a9/libtool [OPTION]... [MODE-ARG]...

Try 'libtool --help' for more information.

libtool:   error: unrecognised option: '-no-suppress'





Placing the option "-no-suppress" as any option after gcc works:

$ /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -no-suppress -DHAVE_CONFIG_
H -I. -I..   -D _GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_
LARGE_FILES -pipe -D _GNU_SOURCE -I../include -Werror -Wall -g -O2 -flto=
auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -
Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -
specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -
specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -
fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -
Wstrict-prototypes -c -o emu.lo emu.c





OR this works as well

/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -D
 _GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGE_FILES -pipe
-D _GNU_SOURCE -I../include -Werror -Wall -g -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-
objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-
security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/
rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/
redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o emu.lo 
emu.c -no-suppress





best regards

Michal Ambroz

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #10 received at 47583-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>
To: 47583-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libtool no-suppress evaluated incorrectly
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:46:37 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thank you for your bug report!

This is the intended behaviour. The '-no-suppress' option is a
compile mode flag, and Section 4.1 of the libtool.pdf [1] should
contain a sufficient description for why this is.

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libtool.pdf

-- 
Ileana Dumitrescu

GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354

[OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]

[OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.