GNU bug report logs - #47587
'guix system edit' subcommand

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@HIDDEN>; dated Sun, 4 Apr 2021 00:20:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2021 00:19:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 03 20:19:12 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lSqTw-0007jD-7x
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:19:12 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41258)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <lle-bout@HIDDEN>) id 1lSqTu-0007j6-Cu
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:19:10 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46924)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <lle-bout@HIDDEN>)
 id 1lSqTu-0004Qp-6F
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:19:10 -0400
Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:46771)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <lle-bout@HIDDEN>)
 id 1lSqTr-00037q-JJ
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:19:09 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (lsl43-1_migr-78-195-19-20.fbx.proxad.net
 [78.195.19.20] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 1340J3X0050715
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:19:03 +0200
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 1340J3X0050715
Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net;
 dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net
Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@HIDDEN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net;
 s=default; t=1617495543;
 bh=sG1GmciE6HBT1cnOT20V7FZ5X4SluUGtGIfNlOXP9gs=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:From;
 b=TcVrrlDnJM01E2H+c5TmvyLWfUzL2wvr32BYpmfH6v1n4I9uZ+xzPvvKlOxCbrcDX
 +vnMcN8HNo0sKAzyQZxPiFqnkSHNErrSA/xZiUADdQaDDiBB5PPzZkX2pnC+nZ8zaV
 Ej9K1sXMubN1Oa51afjlygvGiModbKnaOBcTTSxU=
Message-ID: <b746f1afb867fe331a80c5fdccf317e19b15a7a5.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: 'guix system edit' subcommand
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter <lle-bout@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 02:18:56 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4v837zmWG5yQvGzeT73q"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.33.93.72; envelope-from=lle-bout@HIDDEN;
 helo=mail.zaclys.net
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: Hello! Like 'guix edit hello' we could have 'guix system edit
 screen-locker' for easy access to customize services. What do you think?
 Is this hard to do? 
 Content analysis details:   (1.4 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
 [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 2.7 MAY_BE_FORGED          Relay IP's reverse DNS does not resolve to IP
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


--=-4v837zmWG5yQvGzeT73q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello!

Like 'guix edit hello' we could have 'guix system edit screen-locker'
for easy access to customize services.

What do you think? Is this hard to do?

L=C3=A9o

--=-4v837zmWG5yQvGzeT73q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bk7s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-4v837zmWG5yQvGzeT73q--





Acknowledgement sent to Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#47587; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 00:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.