GNU bug report logs -
#47608
adds emacs-lockstep
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 47608 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47608
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Apr 2021 02:19:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
rdes <rdes <at> protonmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 06 Apr 2021 02:19:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
The attached patch adds emacs-lockstep.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-packages-emacs-xyz.scm-emacs-lockstep-New-variab.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47608
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
rdes via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> The attached patch adds emacs-lockstep.
Thank you. Some comments follow.
> +(define-public emacs-lockstep
> + (let ((commit "5fe78e94533c4a050d3fce23685040ac754c2e54"))
A comment should explain why we're using a commit hash instead of a tag.
> + (package
> + (name "emacs-lockstep")
> + (version "0.1")
This is not the correct version. Actually, I couldn't find any reference
to a version at all in the file, so it should be "0", with a comment.
> + (synopsis
> + "Pair program in Emacs")
Nitpick: Pair programming in Emacs
> + (description
> + "Lockstep is a package for pair programming in Emacs. It synchronizes
> +the windows and points of two or more Emacs frames, so that a team of
> +programmers can share an editing session.
> +
> +BE CAREFUL: any programmer in the session will be able to control the Emacs
> +process running as the user who started the Emacs server.")
Nitpick:
Be careful! All programmers see the same buffers and live edits, and
any programmer can take over the editing session.
> + (license license:gpl3+))))
Unfortunately, I see no reference whatsoever to a license in the code
base. I don't think we can infer this is GPL3+. What makes you think so?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47608
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
rdes <rdes <at> protonmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 47608-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
> > + (license license:gpl3+))))
>
> Unfortunately, I see no reference whatsoever to a license in the code
> base. I don't think we can infer this is GPL3+. What makes you think
> so?
Considering the license issue is not solved, I’m closing this
report. Feel free to re-open it if needed.
Rsgards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
This bug report was last modified today.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.