GNU bug report logs -
#47812
Incorrect code in the Guix manual, but only on the website
Previous Next
Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:53:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47812 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47812 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47812
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
In the Guix manual, as it appears on our website,
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/X-Window.html
the manual entry for 'slim-service-type' suggests the following code to
remove the 'gdm' service from %desktop-services.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(modify-services %desktop-services
(delete gdm-service-type))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This code is incorrect. 'modify-services' does not support deleting
services.
The puzzling thing is that I can't find where this suggested code exists
in our git repository. The manual in our git repository is correct.
Instead of the code above, it suggests:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(remove (lambda (service)
(eq? (service-kind service) gdm-service-type))
%desktop-services)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This is the case on our 'master', 'core-updates', and 'version-1.2.0'
branches. See:
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/doc/guix.texi?id=ebd021f73292bf47b26a799665d6204574bae239#n17891
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/doc/guix.texi?h=core-updates&id=76fc36d0a7215979bb74c05840f5a4de4ab5ea93#n17756
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/doc/guix.texi?h=version-1.2.0&id=8603bcd5822a1a8364a7a74a698059d3d147568b#n17076
The correct text was added about 2 years ago, in the following commit:
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=dbef9015db107dd148133420b89af552ef08f8ee
I see no evidence of it being changed since then.
Any idea where the incorrect code on the website manual is coming from?
Thanks,
Mark
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47812
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 47812 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> writes:
> The correct text was added about 2 years ago, in the following commit:
>
> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=dbef9015db107dd148133420b89af552ef08f8ee
>
> I see no evidence of it being changed since then.
>
> Any idea where the incorrect code on the website manual is coming from?
I see now that this new functionality was added to the 'staging' branch
3 days ago:
https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
It seems inappropriate for our online website manual to be taken from
'staging'. It has already led to an experienced Guix developer
repeatedly suggesting (to a new user) a code snippet that cannot
possibly work on the 'master' branch:
https://bugs.gnu.org/47748#14
https://bugs.gnu.org/47748#41
Mark
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47812
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 47812 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:12:13PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> writes:
>
> > The correct text was added about 2 years ago, in the following commit:
> >
> > https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=dbef9015db107dd148133420b89af552ef08f8ee
> >
> > I see no evidence of it being changed since then.
> >
> > Any idea where the incorrect code on the website manual is coming from?
>
> I see now that this new functionality was added to the 'staging' branch
> 3 days ago:
>
> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
>
> It seems inappropriate for our online website manual to be taken from
> 'staging'. It has already led to an experienced Guix developer
> repeatedly suggesting (to a new user) a code snippet that cannot
> possibly work on the 'master' branch:
Hm, that's not supposed to happen. It's supposed to be based on the
'master' branch.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47812
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 47812 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:12:13PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I see now that this new functionality was added to the 'staging' branch
> 3 days ago:
>
> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
If I understand correctly, this commit is also on the master branch:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=master&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
And I do see it in my local copy of the repo.
Can you double-check on your end? Or have I misunderstood?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47812
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 47812 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tags 47812 + notabug
close 47812
thanks
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:12:13PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I see now that this new functionality was added to the 'staging' branch
>> 3 days ago:
>>
>> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
>
> If I understand correctly, this commit is also on the master branch:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=master&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9
>
> And I do see it in my local copy of the repo.
>
> Can you double-check on your end? Or have I misunderstood?
No, you're right. When I first checked, I hadn't updated my local git
repo recently enough to have the commit. However, I'm not sure how I
managed to include (in my original report) a Savannah URL pointing to
the relevant code without noticing that it had the newly updated code.
I'm closing this bug now. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Mark
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
47812 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Request was from
Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 14 May 2021 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 346 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.