GNU bug report logs -
#47826
[PATCH] gnu: Update blast+ to 2.11.0.
Previous Next
Reported by: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:24:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47826 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47826 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47826
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Guix,
Here's a patch to update blast+ to 2.11.0.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
[0001-gnu-Update-blast-to-2.11.0.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47826
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 47826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:22:59PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> Here's a patch to update blast+ to 2.11.0.
>
> Kind regards,
> Roel Janssen
>
> From 92d8f8602a285fc3ed61656c314a697cd87ae4f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:20:53 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update blast+ to 2.11.0.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (blast+): Update to 2.11.0.
LGTM, assuming the packages the depend on it still build.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47826
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 47826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Leo,
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 12:37 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:22:59PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > Hi Guix,
> >
> > Here's a patch to update blast+ to 2.11.0.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Roel Janssen
> >
>
> > From 92d8f8602a285fc3ed61656c314a697cd87ae4f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001
> > From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:20:53 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update blast+ to 2.11.0.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (blast+): Update to 2.11.0.
>
> LGTM, assuming the packages the depend on it still build.
>
Let's see if I got this right:
$ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh --list-dependent blast+
/home/roel/Programming/guix/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.go
Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages are
rebuilt: roary <at> 3.12.0 proteinortho <at> 6.0.14
So I built roary and proteinortho with the blast+ patch applied, and
both build fine.
Can I conclude from this that packages depending on blast+ still build
fine?
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47826
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 47826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> Let's see if I got this right:
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh --list-dependent blast+
> /home/roel/Programming/guix/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.go
> Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages are
> rebuilt: roary <at> 3.12.0 proteinortho <at> 6.0.14
>
> So I built roary and proteinortho with the blast+ patch applied, and
> both build fine.
>
> Can I conclude from this that packages depending on blast+ still build
> fine?
Yes, exactly! Thanks for testing and please push :)
Reply sent
to
Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 47826-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 14:22 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > Let's see if I got this right:
> > $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh --list-dependent blast+
> > /home/roel/Programming/guix/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.go
> > Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages
> > are
> > rebuilt: roary <at> 3.12.0 proteinortho <at> 6.0.14
> >
> > So I built roary and proteinortho with the blast+ patch applied,
> > and
> > both build fine.
> >
> > Can I conclude from this that packages depending on blast+ still
> > build
> > fine?
>
> Yes, exactly! Thanks for testing and please push :)
>
Thank you for your help!
I pushed this patch in c3926120ba5ea76f531541b7926ccb6739575e0e.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 15 May 2021 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 339 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.