Received: (at 47949) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2021 21:38:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 28 17:38:18 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lbrsv-0003YW-SL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:38:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lbrsu-0003YK-SU for 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:38:17 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lbrsp-0008Da-ME for 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:38:11 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35288 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1lbrso-0003wG-4j; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:38:10 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Roel Janssen <roel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache References: <86b58d34-b9ae-b4bb-f64c-9250e2c109cd@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:38:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86b58d34-b9ae-b4bb-f64c-9250e2c109cd@HIDDEN> (Roel Janssen's message of "Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:38:45 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7jqozsv.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47949 Cc: 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Roel, Roel Janssen <roel@HIDDEN> skribis: > /builder for > `/gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv'=20 > failed to produce output path > `/gnu/store/xgjiqmh9qlvnq1701zb5dsbbwnjx76qq-guix-package-cache' > build of > /gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv > failed > Could not find build log for > '/gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv'. Could you find the log of this derivation? :-) It=E2=80=99ll tell us what=E2=80=99s wrong. > Perhaps, as a matter of diagnostics, it could build package caches > separately for each channel to pinpoint which channel is causing the=20 > problem. Yeah, we=E2=80=99ll have to see what=E2=80=99s doable, but I agree there=E2= =80=99s room for improvement here. Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#47949; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2021 11:38:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 22 07:38:54 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lZXfZ-0001u8-OW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:38:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roel@HIDDEN>) id 1lZXfY-0001u1-04 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:38:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <roel@HIDDEN>) id 1lZXfX-0000aP-KW for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:38:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <roel@HIDDEN>) id 1lZXfX-0001Fy-3x for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:38:51 -0400 Received: from [143.121.198.253] (port=50340) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <roel@HIDDEN>) id 1lZXfS-0001si-S5 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:38:51 -0400 To: bug-guix@HIDDEN From: Roel Janssen <roel@HIDDEN> Subject: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache Message-ID: <86b58d34-b9ae-b4bb-f64c-9250e2c109cd@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:38:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Dear Guix, I'm running into the following problem: ---- $ guix pull Updating channel 'guix-science' from Git repository at 'https://github.com/guix-science/guix-science.git'... Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Building from these channels: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 5763eba guix-sciencehttps://github.com/guix-science/guix-science.git 5a2e3d5 Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... | The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/xy2q5rk35sxn07xjq89l3ga95igjmmsi-profile.drv building package cache... /builder for `/gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/xgjiqmh9qlvnq1701zb5dsbbwnjx76qq-guix-package-cache' build of /gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv failed Could not find build log for '/gnu/store/4q9aprxi2rr1i6yjk1y7d76nbavwp4fy-guix-package-cache.drv'. cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/xy2q5rk35sxn07xjq89l3ga95igjmmsi-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/xy2q5rk35sxn07xjq89l3ga95igjmmsi-profile.drv' failed ---- Is this a known problem? I assume this may be a problem with the "guix-science" channel (which would be my own fault of course). If it is, then perhaps the UI could be improved to show why the package cache couldn't be built. Perhaps, as a matter of diagnostics, it could build package caches separately for each channel to pinpoint which channel is causing the problem. Thanks. Kind regards, Roel Janssen
Roel Janssen <roel@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#47949; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.