GNU logs - #48376, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull"
Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:16:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48376.B.162081455316094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 12:15:40 +0200
Message-ID: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21;
 envelope-from=konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HEXHASH_WORD=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

Today's "guix pull" resulted in an error message that ends with a
request for a bug report. So here it comes:

===========================================================================
Updating channel 'guix-past' from Git repository at 'https://gitlab.inria.fr/guix-hpc/guix-past'...
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
guix pull: warning: moving channel 'guix' from 3e4f6d2bbc6f0f81c1487eb1bb69d8e9fe9bdbd7 to unrelated commit 34985fb6ae7deffd40443766f5408649a0cbbff2
Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to 34985fb (777 new commits)...
Building from these channels:
  guix      https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git	34985fb
  guix-past https://gitlab.inria.fr/guix-hpc/guix-past	0f892e4
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
 module-import  2KiB                   25KiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%

 module-import-compiled  1.4MiB       1.7MiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%

 compute-guix-derivation  1005B         9KiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%

Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... |Backtrace:
          13 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/jbz265j88niryci4f80zfwq92vjy2xam-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    155:9 12 (_ _)
    159:9 11 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
    152:2  9 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
  2076:24  8 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f46cd7e73c0> _ #:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _)
   1910:8  7 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
   256:18  6 (_ _)
   1137:2  5 (_ _)
   1003:2  4 (_ _)
    849:4  3 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
  1958:12  2 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f46cd7e73c0>)
   1372:5  1 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 7f46cd7e73c0> _ _)
  1383:15  0 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f46cd7e73c0> _ _)

./guix/store.scm:1383:15: ERROR:
  1. &store-protocol-error:
      message: "some substitutes for the outputs of derivation `/gnu/store/8kj83zhzcfpp7df9jxsyarnkrbvglwri-guile-json-3.5.0.drv' failed (usually happens due to networking issues); try `--fallback' to build derivation from source "
      status: 1
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/jbz265j88niryci4f80zfwq92vjy2xam-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "34985fb6ae7deffd40443766f5408649a0cbbff2"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "3e4f6d2bbc6f0f81c1487eb1bb69d8e9fe9bdbd7"; pull-version: 1).
Please report it by email to <bug-guix@HIDDEN>.
===========================================================================

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#48376: Acknowledgement (Failure in "guix pull")
Message-ID: <handler.48376.B.162081455316094.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 48376
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:16:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
48376: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D48376
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull"
Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:56:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48376.B48376.16208205103390 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 13:54:55 +0200
Message-ID: <m1zgx0b20g.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Trying the "guix pull" a short while (and one commit to Guix) later, the
error is gone. Which is a bit strange: whatever the cause of the error
was, it's hard to believe that adding the package
"python-sqlalchemy-stubs" (which is what commit
f8a4724c101880892640dcc2fe3438dc2a26b624 did) could fix it.

Konrad.

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull"
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 02:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48376.B48376.16210446328351 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
References: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m1zgx0b20g.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 22:10:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m1zgx0b20g.fsf@HIDDEN> (Konrad
 Hinsen's message of "Wed, 12 May 2021 13:54:55 +0200")
Message-ID: <87wns0692p.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Konrad!

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN> writes:

> Trying the "guix pull" a short while (and one commit to Guix) later, the
> error is gone. Which is a bit strange: whatever the cause of the error
> was, it's hard to believe that adding the package
> "python-sqlalchemy-stubs" (which is what commit
> f8a4724c101880892640dcc2fe3438dc2a26b624 did) could fix it.
>
> Konrad.

Indeed.  I note that the error message that leads to a request to the
bug report mention it could be due to a network failure, which could
explain the transient nature of the problem we see here.

Had you tried multiple times in a row with the same failure on that
commit?

Thank you,

Maxim

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull"
Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 08:31:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48376.B48376.16211538426208 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48376
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 48376-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B48376.16211538426208
          (code B ref 48376); Sun, 16 May 2021 08:31:02 +0000
Received: (at 48376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 08:30:42 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1liCAb-0001c4-Nk
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:41 -0400
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:55169)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>) id 1liCAZ-0001bq-FJ
 for 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:39 -0400
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F495C0116;
 Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=sdoVGRRxs7ayV5Bqf1OLZJYSU+
 klpJkjdvS2ygAudkI=; b=U02unc9Z0+ds9zjYhGbhUr8GyPhpicn6MGRKJsjmgE
 TB5Xc1qBiDXAWY0Ik8syKZhZ+jSh8zh4/cVsbofoA83oJKiNR7QuwvYjrYCD0cWo
 1o3w1ceN8apV+gia9ykzIp5O22466+16gI3pwMcf2sIo5eA//aollI/6WFrL/CcR
 zaUNM2946EouSMTS1AOyxR9r9McZ1AcEAQ7T9drUnrwPcp+wZLhB48dxg2Qg84VL
 FQ5jVBoGN7CWQ0E75+/FFAB26MXsEXEdNuDtETwf0AwYd0zuOVz+08iEUs55cyN3
 WicZBZ/G96Jqe4zs+HAjKcA1CNCT2xwf+VBASDspyYAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=sdoVGR
 Rxs7ayV5Bqf1OLZJYSU+klpJkjdvS2ygAudkI=; b=d0a5bmvfsU40FZobxfK5zB
 M1MBzIiv5Tuy8B43uYIaqILiNboENO1l4xyjclu/wy2dj2eTgCobzaoeXvwYGtMg
 0in4QNp+kCpiUlxt8hl/sa/63N/s2IQASo4lZgH0l1SVf5yhU7mwEbTxyfgBhW1K
 pPeKfg2HvlesaqzjWaENPMLR+XBpI6oKs2ifQbi8vJ9p8ZidEL6Orr+JPAAMWD3h
 Lt5hxbzOI95uuMYYY88PQ0vwS5odb7hqx33wZCpXtZuRgcvnIx3VSvWww1RS9nSu
 ga2poNU1W68Fmz1hTrd10uWdwt4Sl+0MtxXv0O5ksiT31uukxeAbvTCe8UOZkR4Q
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KdigYJ-8d442lUhTmrGCYPCM6PcNzQf4tYhAPRXzWU-BclrZBwOZUw>
 <xme:KdigYNtF_EhRtDmBWPPySQMh-e_IhMLNPvSdj7UP2SJCckFocZ61iYR4qdH6xPvED
 1zsi1ZMG6wsJZIR>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeifedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepmfhonhhrrggu
 ucfjihhnshgvnhcuoehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhinhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth
 eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieekjeejveeuieefjeehtdegtefhudetgfevfffhueeh
 jeevieeigedvhfdtieefnecukfhppeekiedrvdegiedrudelledrudejleenucevlhhush
 htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhi
 nhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KdigYHDYcAGqTq3_qGX3qsIelWc9bYjkV130uiSBEPNFpTLLhmn4Aw>
 <xmx:KdigYNczpOsVgLj-2Bonre9a5X5ry0fVTn4ss5cWKh5PBRs_HelsVw>
 <xmx:KdigYOMA9VNsgpOHloYtluZd8xMrnPkuKu6ZcE5T1CdJ0h2Wh7Yorg>
 <xmx:KdigYIWTdkbbQ5e6mOq5PmFuuSLOXZ1bfUUG5iU0jn-SlMEsv9xq4w>
Received: from ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home
 (lfbn-idf2-1-496-179.w86-246.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.246.199.179])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA;
 Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87wns0692p.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m1zgx0b20g.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wns0692p.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 10:30:31 +0200
Message-ID: <m14kf3axnc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

Hi Maxim,

Thanks for your reply!

> Indeed.  I note that the error message that leads to a request to the
> bug report mention it could be due to a network failure, which could
> explain the transient nature of the problem we see here.
>
> Had you tried multiple times in a row with the same failure on that
> commit?

Yes, I tried again later on two different machines, without any problem.

The reason I submitted a bug report is because Guix told me so. I
assumed that even if the root cause was a network issue, something had
then happened that shouldn't happen. If that's not the case, then the
error message should be improved. A minimal improvement would be to say
"Please report unless you see a comment about networking issues above.".

Cheers,
  Konrad.

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull"
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:38:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48376.B48376.162128387318591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48376
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 48376-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B48376.162128387318591
          (code B ref 48376); Mon, 17 May 2021 20:38:01 +0000
Received: (at 48376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2021 20:37:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53902 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lijzt-0004pn-K8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37:53 -0400
Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]:39459)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1lijzo-0004p8-Pw
 for 48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37:50 -0400
Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id eb9so3829270qvb.6
 for <48376 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=yKuxjFP+WqJY9h7I2qYL7xTcJ2j47135CBHGkIQZxlQ=;
 b=gRlCA4cd8hCGHlM2FuVLPDDgB7Xe7ybhcUx4sPxtRW6Sm1ZLRyN8IhLG7k4wxdSAmf
 VSDLKTK2aQCfDmwmsSRXjTRSvD3kybIBTaN64H7k+87tQaMsD8PXtm/PF+hY+746gImM
 xxHde7c+fv63HCNLqm/k8XTWBb2NqhF9WJ4un6DEKOQwYS16OTmRYyqM+qsEx+wpRYO0
 EFkgVitr1hddlASFvvNCnMjp0w47xjM0wy2K47U/Mxa6RfTUp6LfnJ3dI4/PNY6VDOEM
 b84SOWYbH5d1JNyM7Ti2k5ehg5CRnxkQ1sMVhjcx5d7kx4x2b01Rp2ezxkRtVoLIPx1y
 YPzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=yKuxjFP+WqJY9h7I2qYL7xTcJ2j47135CBHGkIQZxlQ=;
 b=tIXH4Anpa+KfAs0ohOXay/9437IIslmV2I98TF94EX2v28CSIVnfTBt6iVuV6H3jYG
 f27RsWV5VCrL8vi8ODfqpq2yL4W7whrZXMx3uRev/AK9Q880BJ7Hjj+/p9WGfzoQ7J5n
 3wPwHxI4RNeu6knP/lhADvpyvwKXDhtupQc5hjmcZZYPKO0VxfXS/o+LQZ1Pah30LIBF
 6LNRajdjTSuIWSpVObZhp29wvMHsve2rdQAI/0R3VFismojXCh5QaZH2bUmYi9YUU/n+
 3Ru5aPNS1VUN6mNN1VmnouWxeNquPHviW9C8cUvVaW6VXvedxU6pI6/SOpg1e9TSArVF
 INUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Tcxy47rsf1pz6QJK0qwnDv/EU17xGhjTPWzPP/NbehpebWOLv
 rgQqsSb1EhYUjQXMw+7Ch6q8O64gSSE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKrP4SpHsQfZd1rb/4lXK24VhCMczP+GqF55P1x9sZPYkLQcP8hvyo6pHONXRxKRjJOWsTUw==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:42b3:: with SMTP id e19mr1691080qvr.62.1621283863022; 
 Mon, 17 May 2021 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hurd (dsl-236-124-184.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.124.184])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t128sm11089136qkh.50.2021.05.17.13.37.42
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 17 May 2021 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
References: <m15yzocl6b.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m1zgx0b20g.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wns0692p.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m14kf3axnc.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m14kf3axnc.fsf@HIDDEN> (Konrad
 Hinsen's message of "Sun, 16 May 2021 10:30:31 +0200")
Message-ID: <874kf1nlka.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Konrad,

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
>> Indeed.  I note that the error message that leads to a request to the
>> bug report mention it could be due to a network failure, which could
>> explain the transient nature of the problem we see here.
>>
>> Had you tried multiple times in a row with the same failure on that
>> commit?
>
> Yes, I tried again later on two different machines, without any problem.
>
> The reason I submitted a bug report is because Guix told me so. I
> assumed that even if the root cause was a network issue, something had
> then happened that shouldn't happen. If that's not the case, then the
> error message should be improved. A minimal improvement would be to say
> "Please report unless you see a comment about networking issues above.".

I agree!  We don't want people to send bug reports every time their
network is flaky, if this is indeed what has happened.  Would you be
interested at surveying if that's the case in the current code?  Perhaps
the right change would then become apparent.

Thank you,

Maxim

Last modified: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.