GNU bug report logs - #48398
many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed profile like ~/.guix-profile

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 14:27:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 48398 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48398; Package guix. (Thu, 13 May 2021 14:27:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 13 May 2021 14:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed profile
 like ~/.guix-profile
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:56:11 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed profiles (e.g.
~/.guix-profile)

These are two instances

1. blueman
2. font-conf so most of font like font-lohit will not be available

I had noticed that fixed profiles have become part of many
packages/services definition
which could be the reason that many of these packages/services become
dependent on
these fixed profiles.

It can be checked with

$ ag   --scheme  '.guix-profile'
$ grep -r '.guix-profile'

in code


Also

We provides necessary services through putting environment variables in
each profiles

PROFILE_PATH/etc/profile

  like for pidgin/purple
  PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH

  for libraries
  LIBRARY_PATH


As suggestion

We could first provide augment all variables with guix specific prefix e.g.
GUIX_PEV_...
(PVS profile environment variables.)

So these all variables will become


  GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
  GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH

then we could or could not (left to user) to set them
  PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
  LIBRARY_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH


So with prefixed env vars, in first look one will know it is coming from
guix related profiles.
maybe it will also help in removing dependencies on fixed profiles.

/syam
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48398; Package guix. (Thu, 13 May 2021 21:56:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>, 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed
 profile like ~/.guix-profile
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 23:55:20 +0200
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2021, 19:56 +0530 schrieb Shyam Saran:
> many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed profiles
> (e.g. ~/.guix-profile)
While this is true, there is not necessarily a common cause for all
such instances.  Even among packages, that hardcode ~/.guix-profile,
there might be differences, so it's better to focus on specific
instances or groups of instances, in which one fix can be applied to
all of them.

> 1. blueman
Please provide more information on blueman.
> 2. font-conf so most of font like font-lohit will not be available
This one has a history.  Instead of exposing itself to the dangers of
environment variables, fontconfig took the reasonable approach of
letting itself be controlled by XML files, so if you want it to work
differently from how it usually behaves, you have to edit those.

> I had noticed that fixed profiles have become part of many
> packages/services definition which could be the reason that many of
> these packages/services become dependent on these fixed profiles.
Which packages/services in particular?

> It can be checked with
> 
> $ ag   --scheme  '.guix-profile'
> $ grep -r '.guix-profile'
> 
> in code
I find 65 matches including documentation.  Even assuming every one of
them was a package, it would affect about 1% of packages, many of which
would probably be leaf packages.  So while this number is definitely
large enough to intimidate those who want to quickly fix a number of
them, it is also smaller in scale than the report would imply.

> 
> Also
> 
> We provides necessary services through putting environment variables
> in each profiles
> 
> PROFILE_PATH/etc/profile
> 
>   like for pidgin/purple
>   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> 
>   for libraries
>   LIBRARY_PATH
> 
> 
> As suggestion
> 
> We could first provide augment all variables with guix specific
> prefix e.g. GUIX_PEV_...
> (PVS profile environment variables.)
> 
> So these all variables will become
> 
> 
>   GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
>   GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> 
> then we could or could not (left to user) to set them
>   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
>   LIBRARY_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> 
> 
> So with prefixed env vars, in first look one will know it is coming
> from guix related profiles.
> maybe it will also help in removing dependencies on fixed profiles.
Guix already prefixes some environment variables, that might cause
issues if they are read by all variants of a package with GUIX_.  I
don't think this needs to be done for every search path, however. 
Again, specific instances like GUIX_PYTHONPATH can (and should be)
discussed, but I don't think this solves the relation to fixed
profiles.

Regards,
Leo





Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48398; Package guix. (Tue, 18 May 2021 08:16:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
Cc: 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed
 profile like ~/.guix-profile
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:44:43 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This below error I am getting

$ blueman-manager

                                                                       718s

blueman-manager version 2.1.4 starting
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File
"/gnu/store/894nlym6bvmn3cza9q775pg4f1gvixxa-blueman-2.1.4/lib/python3.8/site-packages/blueman/main/Manager.py",
line 111, in on_dbus_name_appeared
    check_bluetooth_status(_("Bluetooth needs to be turned on for the
device manager to function"),
  File
"/gnu/store/894nlym6bvmn3cza9q775pg4f1gvixxa-blueman-2.1.4/lib/python3.8/site-packages/blueman/Functions.py",
line 73, in check_bluetooth_status
    if "PowerManager" not in applet.QueryPlugins():
  File
"/gnu/store/qrpkvnya5z5q2n1lc024wbxb27p9wrzq-python-pygobject-3.34.0/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gi/overrides/Gio.py",
line 351, in __call__
    result = self.dbus_proxy.call_sync(self.method_name, arg_variant,
gi.repository.GLib.Error: g-dbus-error-quark:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
org.blueman.Applet was not provided by any .service files (2)




(thanks for support)




On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 03:25, Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2021, 19:56 +0530 schrieb Shyam Saran:
> > many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed profiles
> > (e.g. ~/.guix-profile)
> While this is true, there is not necessarily a common cause for all
> such instances.  Even among packages, that hardcode ~/.guix-profile,
> there might be differences, so it's better to focus on specific
> instances or groups of instances, in which one fix can be applied to
> all of them.
>
> > 1. blueman
> Please provide more information on blueman.
> > 2. font-conf so most of font like font-lohit will not be available
> This one has a history.  Instead of exposing itself to the dangers of
> environment variables, fontconfig took the reasonable approach of
> letting itself be controlled by XML files, so if you want it to work
> differently from how it usually behaves, you have to edit those.
>
> > I had noticed that fixed profiles have become part of many
> > packages/services definition which could be the reason that many of
> > these packages/services become dependent on these fixed profiles.
> Which packages/services in particular?
>
> > It can be checked with
> >
> > $ ag   --scheme  '.guix-profile'
> > $ grep -r '.guix-profile'
> >
> > in code
> I find 65 matches including documentation.  Even assuming every one of
> them was a package, it would affect about 1% of packages, many of which
> would probably be leaf packages.  So while this number is definitely
> large enough to intimidate those who want to quickly fix a number of
> them, it is also smaller in scale than the report would imply.
>
> >
> > Also
> >
> > We provides necessary services through putting environment variables
> > in each profiles
> >
> > PROFILE_PATH/etc/profile
> >
> >   like for pidgin/purple
> >   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> >
> >   for libraries
> >   LIBRARY_PATH
> >
> >
> > As suggestion
> >
> > We could first provide augment all variables with guix specific
> > prefix e.g. GUIX_PEV_...
> > (PVS profile environment variables.)
> >
> > So these all variables will become
> >
> >
> >   GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> >   GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> >
> > then we could or could not (left to user) to set them
> >   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> >   LIBRARY_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> >
> >
> > So with prefixed env vars, in first look one will know it is coming
> > from guix related profiles.
> > maybe it will also help in removing dependencies on fixed profiles.
> Guix already prefixes some environment variables, that might cause
> issues if they are read by all variants of a package with GUIX_.  I
> don't think this needs to be done for every search path, however.
> Again, specific instances like GUIX_PYTHONPATH can (and should be)
> discussed, but I don't think this solves the relation to fixed
> profiles.
>
> Regards,
> Leo
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48398; Package guix. (Tue, 18 May 2021 08:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Shyam Saran <syamsaran12345 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 48398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed
 profile like ~/.guix-profile
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:35:32 +0200
Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 18.05.2021, 13:44 +0530 schrieb Shyam Saran:
> This below error I am getting
> 
> blueman-manager version 2.1.4 starting
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/gnu/store/894nlym6bvmn3cza9q775pg4f1gvixxa-blueman-
> 2.1.4/lib/python3.8/site-packages/blueman/main/Manager.py", line 111,
> in on_dbus_name_appeared
>     check_bluetooth_status(_("Bluetooth needs to be turned on for the
> device manager to function"),
>   File "/gnu/store/894nlym6bvmn3cza9q775pg4f1gvixxa-blueman-
> 2.1.4/lib/python3.8/site-packages/blueman/Functions.py", line 73, in
> check_bluetooth_status
>     if "PowerManager" not in applet.QueryPlugins():
>   File "/gnu/store/qrpkvnya5z5q2n1lc024wbxb27p9wrzq-python-pygobject-
> 3.34.0/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gi/overrides/Gio.py", line 351, in
> __call__
>     result = self.dbus_proxy.call_sync(self.method_name, arg_variant,
> gi.repository.GLib.Error: g-dbus-error-quark:
> GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
> org.blueman.Applet was not provided by any .service files (2)
> 
> (thanks for support)
That's a problem with DBus not finding your .service file.  You can
work around that by manually starting the service from a Guix
environment (`$GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/share/dbus-1/services` should list
them) or directly from store.

FWIW launching blueman-applet directly leads to another, more confusing
DBus error.  I'm not sure whether adding the dbus package to your
environment fixes any of it, but it's worth a try.
> 
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 03:25, Leo Prikler <
> leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2021, 19:56 +0530 schrieb Shyam Saran:
> > > many packages become nonfunctional if not install in fixed
> > profiles
> > > (e.g. ~/.guix-profile)
> > While this is true, there is not necessarily a common cause for all
> > such instances.  Even among packages, that hardcode ~/.guix-
> > profile,
> > there might be differences, so it's better to focus on specific
> > instances or groups of instances, in which one fix can be applied
> > to
> > all of them.
> > 
> > > 1. blueman
> > Please provide more information on blueman.
> > > 2. font-conf so most of font like font-lohit will not be
> > available
> > This one has a history.  Instead of exposing itself to the dangers
> > of
> > environment variables, fontconfig took the reasonable approach of
> > letting itself be controlled by XML files, so if you want it to
> > work
> > differently from how it usually behaves, you have to edit those.
> > 
> > > I had noticed that fixed profiles have become part of many
> > > packages/services definition which could be the reason that many
> > of
> > > these packages/services become dependent on these fixed profiles.
> > Which packages/services in particular?
> > 
> > > It can be checked with
> > > 
> > > $ ag   --scheme  '.guix-profile'
> > > $ grep -r '.guix-profile'
> > > 
> > > in code
> > I find 65 matches including documentation.  Even assuming every one
> > of
> > them was a package, it would affect about 1% of packages, many of
> > which
> > would probably be leaf packages.  So while this number is
> > definitely
> > large enough to intimidate those who want to quickly fix a number
> > of
> > them, it is also smaller in scale than the report would imply.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also
> > > 
> > > We provides necessary services through putting environment
> > variables
> > > in each profiles
> > > 
> > > PROFILE_PATH/etc/profile
> > > 
> > >   like for pidgin/purple
> > >   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> > > 
> > >   for libraries
> > >   LIBRARY_PATH
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As suggestion
> > > 
> > > We could first provide augment all variables with guix specific
> > > prefix e.g. GUIX_PEV_...
> > > (PVS profile environment variables.)
> > > 
> > > So these all variables will become
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> > >   GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> > > 
> > > then we could or could not (left to user) to set them
> > >   PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_PURPLE_PLUGIN_PATH
> > >   LIBRARY_PATH=$GUIX_PEV_LIBRARY_PATH
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So with prefixed env vars, in first look one will know it is
> > coming
> > > from guix related profiles.
> > > maybe it will also help in removing dependencies on fixed
> > profiles.
> > Guix already prefixes some environment variables, that might cause
> > issues if they are read by all variants of a package with GUIX_.  I
> > don't think this needs to be done for every search path, however. 
> > Again, specific instances like GUIX_PYTHONPATH can (and should be)
> > discussed, but I don't think this solves the relation to fixed
> > profiles.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Leo
> > 





This bug report was last modified 2 years and 315 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.