GNU bug report logs - #48440
[PATCH] gnu: guix: Update to 97d615b.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 13:29:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 48440 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 48440 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#48440; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 15 May 2021 13:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 15 May 2021 13:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guix: Update to 97d615b.
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 14:28:19 +0100
* gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix): Update to 97d615b.
---
 gnu/packages/package-management.scm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
index c72c2211b3..db8f87765b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
@@ -132,8 +132,8 @@
   ;; Note: the 'update-guix-package.scm' script expects this definition to
   ;; start precisely like this.
   (let ((version "1.3.0")
-        (commit "771b866c55e5f992df60f6c32f5fdd78b64e17f6")
-        (revision 1))
+        (commit "97d615b1761c2054561057f6b56e2a0caed13aa4")
+        (revision 2))
     (package
       (name "guix")
 
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
                       (commit commit)))
                 (sha256
                  (base32
-                  "0w8w05w6v3lc6478vfw67jzn0hbd9nsncpx9i9ch1lck53r8vs44"))
+                  "1v8k7i897xc8kiyyxk5bc4rs37askq3ccdsmva0sjm7px6a2lzmz"))
                 (file-name (string-append "guix-" version "-checkout"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-- 
2.30.1





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#48440; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 19 May 2021 20:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 48440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 48440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48440: [PATCH] gnu: guix: Update to 97d615b.
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:51:43 +0200
Hi,

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix): Update to 97d615b.

In general LGTM if you’ve checked that it builds fine :-) and that
‘./pre-inst-env guix build -S guix --check’ passes (to avoid mistakes
such as wrong hash).

Out of curiosity, what was the motivation?

Thanks,
Ludo’.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#48440; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 19 May 2021 23:05:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 48440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 48440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48440: [PATCH] gnu: guix: Update to 97d615b.
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 00:04:26 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix): Update to 97d615b.
>
> In general LGTM if you’ve checked that it builds fine :-) and that
> ‘./pre-inst-env guix build -S guix --check’ passes (to avoid mistakes
> such as wrong hash).
>
> Out of curiosity, what was the motivation?

I want the guix package to include the inferior package replacement
change [1], so that I can start using it in the Guix Data Service.

1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=97d615b1761c2054561057f6b56e2a0caed13aa4

I filed the patch because I couldn't get it to build locally, and I was
wondering if it was something specific to my machine. I think this was a
bad theory though, I'm guessing something has broken with the challenge
test so that it just hangs.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 22 May 2021 08:35:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 22 May 2021 08:35:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 48440-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 48440-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#48440] [PATCH] gnu: guix: Update to 97d615b.
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 09:33:58 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix): Update to 97d615b.
>>
>> In general LGTM if you’ve checked that it builds fine :-) and that
>> ‘./pre-inst-env guix build -S guix --check’ passes (to avoid mistakes
>> such as wrong hash).
>>
>> Out of curiosity, what was the motivation?
>
> I want the guix package to include the inferior package replacement
> change [1], so that I can start using it in the Guix Data Service.
>
> 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=97d615b1761c2054561057f6b56e2a0caed13aa4
>
> I filed the patch because I couldn't get it to build locally, and I was
> wondering if it was something specific to my machine. I think this was a
> bad theory though, I'm guessing something has broken with the challenge
> test so that it just hangs.

I'm guessing this broken test was fixed just after I sent this email (in
[2]), so I've gone ahead and updated the Guix package now [3].

2: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=0471024acce5f760ac147326c06343c9c68ad3d1
3: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=fbabf0bec61c88755d6dd238717a356ca3a20b80
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 19 Jun 2021 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 310 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.