GNU bug report logs - #48457
linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 48457 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 48457 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
To: "bug-guix <at> gnu.org" <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 23:36:03 +0000

Using Guix System 1f685684a0f91d7dcd9cb2672789529e1f169504 x86_64, this package fails to build:

grafting '/gnu/store/x8hjznr57jv8hcipy6dn0cxcjy0qpp7l-linkchecker-9.4.0' -> '/gnu/store/acav1prwk6yx8hadd7qsinak0847xh1n-linkchecker-9.4.0'...
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 160: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure 7ffff5cf0cc0> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 7ffff5cf0cc0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  66: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 12 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2412: 11 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 7ffff5d11900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4084:3 ()>]
4089: 10 [#<procedure 7ffff5d11900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4084:3 ()>]
1734: 9 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1739: 8 [#<procedure 7ffff5d229c0 ()>]
In unknown file:
   ?: 7 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/3i6fj7ddih5qjp0isa8ab9rm7a9n20qq-linkchecker-9.4.0-guile-builder"]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 387: 6 [eval # ()]
In guix/build/graft.scm:
 435: 5 [graft (#) (#) (# # # # ...) ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 639: 4 [for-each #<procedure 7ffff5670b40 at guix/build/graft.scm:435:12 (input output)> ...]
In guix/build/graft.scm:
 368: 3 [rewrite-directory "/gnu/store/x8hjznr57jv8hcipy6dn0cxcjy0qpp7l-linkchecker-9.4.0" ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 575: 2 [map #<procedure 7ffff5673ca0 at guix/build/graft.scm:368:11 (expr)> #]
In guix/build/graft.scm:
 374: 1 [#<procedure 7ffff5673ca0 at guix/build/graft.scm:368:11 (expr)> #]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]

ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
ERROR: replacement length differs from the original length "90i4g1bnh6xblvpvr8sx3m0k66xna390-python2-urllib3-1.26.2" "45b698p4rdsfp79l3qhxzk3msja14bsa-python2-python2-python2-urllib3-1.26.4"


---
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/

Message #8 received at 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:19:01 +0200

Hi,


On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 23:36, Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com> wrote:
> Using Guix System 1f685684a0f91d7dcd9cb2672789529e1f169504 x86_64, this package fails to build:

I confirm the graft fails also with c03da7e.  In other words,

  guix build linkchecker --no-grafts”

works fine.

> grafting '/gnu/store/x8hjznr57jv8hcipy6dn0cxcjy0qpp7l-linkchecker-9.4.0' -> '/gnu/store/acav1prwk6yx8hadd7qsinak0847xh1n-linkchecker-9.4.0'...

[...]

> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> ERROR: replacement length differs from the original length "90i4g1bnh6xblvpvr8sx3m0k66xna390-python2-urllib3-1.26.2" "45b698p4rdsfp79l3qhxzk3msja14bsa-python2-python2-python2-urllib3-1.26.4"

Since the package ’linkchecker’ is a ’python-2’ package, I do not know
if it is worth to fix.  And my opinion is simply to remove it.  WDYT?


All the best,
simon

Message #11 received at 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:55:55 +0000

On Thursday, June 10th, 2021 at 11:19 AM, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> > ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> >
> > ERROR: replacement length differs from the original length "90i4g1bnh6xblvpvr8sx3m0k66xna390-python2-urllib3-1.26.2" "45b698p4rdsfp79l3qhxzk3msja14bsa-python2-python2-python2-urllib3-1.26.4"
>
> Since the package ’linkchecker’ is a ’python-2’ package, I do not know
>
> if it is worth to fix. And my opinion is simply to remove it. WDYT?

Oh, I didn't know Python 2 had reached its end of life. I'm not a user of the package, just wanted to tried it out. So, if removing it is the right thing to do, I'm fine with that.

Message #14 received at 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 48457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:49:24 +0200

Hi,

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 15:55, Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, I didn't know Python 2 had reached its end of life. I'm not a user of the package, just wanted to tried it out. So, if removing it is the right thing to do, I'm fine with that.

The EOL was January, 1rst 2020. <https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2/>

Thanks,
simon

Message #19 received at 48457-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>, Luis Felipe
 <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 48457-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 22:29:57 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Version 10.0.1 (the latest version) of linkchecker supports python 3,
and I updated the package a month or so ago. Closing this bug report
now.

Cheers,
Arun

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.