zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 48587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 10:27:19 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 02 06:27:19 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lzGOF-0000tC-CA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 06:27:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:36394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lzGOC-0000sj-TA for 48587 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 06:27:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id m41-20020a05600c3b29b02901dcd3733f24so8735723wms.1 for <48587 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AO6gPbW1fdaM6Qy/HvDtzovYeM0sZn3H60qrRU8hQGI=; b=M0eGppBUbdvbKT63VVT4QnIEGSb0EtyC2FEKs/YSBKs99dI1th6m8shGYv4Nfenl+q DqYSqNRW1BWV6QUWrCUozmxjGUCCOhmMwKqKNcVC1JeIuEqnZqs4Ih2zwE8N/ImtuLRb UQOyeaohsbBMPadSKaCE9f0+da4O/a47PAAt5bxUYcRR5jCY7aZlKxVcra16jlzeVIzF IQeYCTEhGGzbUDA58JzwoOhpd1McAyIgXConS/5uW/bmOMfHXQszy6ekGkEko4AmVAzs CjUTvz2muJICDEoQLJ1SDtW4pF7h+TOsd47Xfd6v3FYcQOAOfiCyVZgFL/p84VFBHRjn eN6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AO6gPbW1fdaM6Qy/HvDtzovYeM0sZn3H60qrRU8hQGI=; b=GAo4YuqRnciaBLd7U+SE5GCB1xwx7FLGeqwJcIl4GE/AG84Opg2KIUWyDc6yjHWkIE nf09lhN8byRbPlSHex8qy6P9Rz7+CdMSayzqolw0mHc/rPAvGd8oAbsrcArn9AP/QmSj RX0f1LT5X/g0hylFhHuUUW6UiDJwWxZYp4IRT5Pc8b3WAWUUROmwQX55MCL+sw8GtswE vKATaOD/a/y4Hcm8t3ySJDKcwbf/ZPgRaOHotywKQLjnCB9W61hT4tBncQWy1XV1b5zO xNamVJ55mdO8UXsjtK5JfvL53VCEILEnywJeJyunKRs25bb9DLno4g3qdR7a9iFc9Sid omgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530icJyiD/4CKK1DASvCCXleG/3CiblutTKNcMahp1sWyfrDbAj7 5+tnVBNXi8O3O1bHzs95jYKmiFag6hg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzw1e8uu5qYBUjEt3vI+6Dg9DuPypRYfs933Wv5dx/h9JTKDZYxBG+cVNP3WOeFdr6Ranpsww== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc8f:: with SMTP id p15mr8857700wma.19.1625221631083; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm2524637wmk.18.2021.07.02.03.27.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:10 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: "Emanuele M. Monterosso" <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#48587: Amule 2.3.3 References: <87tumupvfp.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:42:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tumupvfp.fsf@HIDDEN> (Emanuele M. Monterosso's message of "Sat, 22 May 2021 18:47:22 +0200") Message-ID: <874kdooael.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. So [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48587 Cc: 48587 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. So [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" <emanuele.monterosso= @gmail.com> wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. Something in > the build system has changed, I believe pkg-config and thus guix fails > to automatically build it. Using 3694c0d, the substitute is available, i.e., it is built. :-) --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix weather amule calcul de 1 d=C3=A9rivations de paquets pour x86_64-linux=E2=80=A6 recherche de 1 =C3=A9l=C3=A9ments du d=C3=A9p=C3=B4t sur https://ci.guix.gn= u.org... https://ci.guix.gnu.org 100.0 % des substituts sont disponibles (1 sur 1) au moins 17,3 Mo de fichiers nar (compress=C3=A9s) 23,1 Mo sur le disque (d=C3=A9compress=C3=A9) 0,220 secondes par requ=C3=AAte (0,2 secondes en tout) 4,5 requ=C3=AAtes par seconde 6 constructions dans la queue aarch64-linux : 6 (100.0 %) vitesse de construction : .00 constructions par l'heure aarch64-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure x86_64-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure i686-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure recherche de 1 =C3=A9l=C3=A9ments du d=C3=A9p=C3=B4t sur https://bordeaux.g= uix.gnu.org... https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org 100.0 % des substituts sont disponibles (1 sur 1) 4,3 Mo de fichiers nar (compress=C3=A9s) 23,1 Mo sur le disque (d=C3=A9compress=C3=A9) 0,117 secondes par requ=C3=AAte (0,1 secondes en tout) 8,5 requ=C3=AAtes par seconde (informations sur l=E2=80=99int=C3=A9gration continue indisponibles) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Even, the package seems reproducible: guix build amule guix build amule --no-grafts --check Last, running: guix environment --pure --ad-hoc amule -- amule seems to work. Could you provide more details about what fails? Thanks, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#48587
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2021 17:26:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 22 13:26:21 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lkVOE-0006Wr-BI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:26:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN>) id 1lkUme-0005d0-PW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 12:47:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN>) id 1lkUme-0003XY-G0 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 22 May 2021 12:47:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]:44905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN>) id 1lkUmd-0000Hb-5S for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 22 May 2021 12:47:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id lz27so35102771ejb.11 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sat, 22 May 2021 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=jg5mqSj9IU6yulM5j72xvum1WGiMRy7nBH8Q2Mdm5UQ=; b=SXekxLxPfpjTz9YfYQyL3FCyfBQtFB7lPJDDpCXPNmpNJu7jM1J7+8msMI3YYHI8cR abMcKVwKN+LIUWCJKcHb3t2xz630tfV2iucxDSfPjgVowQExGmr9o9TAQMk64+0FGjr4 U2VDQYEJvFWW5GqpaFUNfCMO1bLqFrtN0+fY72ctlbbRRcGlHvEI0EiJ96lgB+U4LHSI 1vkfaAV3l7E4AEDlb/X2a+1NuOIdcxhWHqwYB7OGu/RL3CG9JyVXqsATaUK+aGhVa7+S lxm4hXjsGgr0b/8XmsPS1BxFkT2NnrhNQJEOa9EEmwm6YHS2FRN+c8StugA4brhmU88r saBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=jg5mqSj9IU6yulM5j72xvum1WGiMRy7nBH8Q2Mdm5UQ=; b=Pcj3VPHtHVMyVek05ia99jblmVXiwTAVY+Y8oSyYGWc3T55OrQaLN5GFPNUgEfW8W6 AUvJlX1nNJlUuJVc1tuVRvPftfLJ7knsgiQeP+/L30uZjfC86fqDm8YNcOiT8k0bl40M iwULO2QqY3YnI1Kzh2ztscMpVCAGrLVaXmfzswUUedELJ5Abd7Y/EicfEwoOS95SCR70 w28tEJ3EXuFCddpOr35zHbF5kaH2EPSCK+XxsmCf7MFkDuLba/r5B0RdB3C8dmiPCRDB BRffgqso1bj2nEIciKj1lzA4GR5dDMMI9wryEsklKV6yNaHimDTo0t4IarYVohQdNocw StcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dr0p1Mpp3vr2NLCYxHJAZdTs/GxbooKMFaYOY7q7A27LKMqEz H4dQYswnY3Q+4YWtCVKgvhyBgvne7BA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzM5h9zxSPzm4hCKCYlFl9knhk380Z+0XxD9zDUzC/u5tcxQriSxo9g1p7opACh/eJp9LAjEg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2dcd:: with SMTP id h13mr15982962eji.41.1621702044970; Sat, 22 May 2021 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2001:b07:5d33:643d:2493:ed31:7893:5cb2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm5527165ejq.62.2021.05.22.09.47.24 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 May 2021 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Emanuele M. Monterosso" <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Amule 2.3.3 Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 18:47:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87tumupvfp.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62c; envelope-from=emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ej1-x62c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 22 May 2021 13:26:16 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. Something in the build system has changed, I believe pkg-config and thus guix fails to automatically build it. -- Emanuele M. Monterosso
"Emanuele M. Monterosso" <emanuele.monterosso@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#48587
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.