GNU logs - #48591, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
Resent-From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 20:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B.16217147918570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 12:19:30 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-STz/X+4pIRh1d+lBXLMk"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=95.128.36.41;
 envelope-from=christopher@HIDDEN; helo=mx.kolabnow.com
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)


--=-STz/X+4pIRh1d+lBXLMk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi, I found another package, ugrep, which is evidently using native
instructions that do not work on my processor. When I run ugrep (e.g.,
`ugrep -Q') it immediately dies with error 'illegal instruction'.
However, if I pull the source with `guix build -S' and build and
install it to a local directory, it runs without trouble.

I'm sure this will also be a reproducibility bug, and plan on
submitting guix challenge results. However, the command I am running to
rebuild ugrep without grafts or substitutes is rebuilding everything
all the way back to bootstrap, so it probably will not be completed for
a day or two:

guix gc -D $(guix build --no-grafts ugrep); guix build --no-substitutes 
ugrep

Please compare similar bug 48373. It didn't seem worth the trouble of
running an object dump and figuring out which instruction is illegal,
but I could do that if required.

My system information:


christopher@nightshade ~$ grep 'flags' /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 1
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nopl
nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm
cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch
osvw ibs skinit wdt hw_pstate vmmcall npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save

christopher@nightshade ~$ neofetch --stdout
christopher@nightshade 
---------------------- 
OS: Guix System d4ffa9630277fa8699c783c08381d688626d4bc3 x86_64 
Host: GA-880GM-UD2H 
Kernel: 5.12.5-gnu 
Uptime: 1 hour, 30 mins 
Packages: 107 (guix-system), 93 (guix-user) 
Shell: bash 5.0.16 
Resolution: 1920x1200 
DE: GNOME 3.34.5 
Theme: Adwaita [GTK2/3] 
Icons: Adwaita [GTK2/3] 
Terminal: kitty 
CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 455 (3) @ 3.300GHz 
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 
Memory: 1573MiB / 7957MiB 

christopher@nightshade ~$ guix describe
Generation 5	May 22 2021 09:43:30	(current)
  guix d4ffa96
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: d4ffa9630277fa8699c783c08381d688626d4bc3


-- 
Christopher Howard
blog: https://librehacker.com
social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker

--=-STz/X+4pIRh1d+lBXLMk
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html dir=3D"ltr"><head></head><body style=3D"text-align:left; direction:lt=
r;"><div>Hi, I found another package, ugrep, which is evidently using nativ=
e instructions that do not work on my processor. When I run ugrep (e.g., `u=
grep -Q') it immediately dies with error 'illegal instruction'. However, if=
 I pull the source with `guix build -S' and build and install it to a local=
 directory, it runs without trouble.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm sure this=
 will also be a reproducibility bug, and plan on submitting guix challenge =
results. However, the command I am running to rebuild ugrep without grafts =
or substitutes is rebuilding everything all the way back to bootstrap, so i=
t probably will not be completed for a day or two:</div><div><br></div><div=
>guix gc -D $(guix build --no-grafts ugrep); guix build --no-substitutes ug=
rep</div><div><br></div><div>Please compare similar bug 48373. It didn't se=
em worth the trouble of running an object dump and figuring out which instr=
uction is illegal, but I could do that if required.</div><div><br></div><di=
v>My system information:</div><div><br></div><div></div><div><a href=3D"mai=
lto:christopher@nightshade">christopher@nightshade</a> ~$ grep 'flags' /pro=
c/cpuinfo | head -n 1</div><div>flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8=
 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall =
nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good n=
opl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legac=
y svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skini=
t wdt hw_pstate vmmcall npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save</div><div><br></div><di=
v><a href=3D"mailto:christopher@nightshade">christopher@nightshade</a> ~$ n=
eofetch --stdout</div><div><a href=3D"mailto:christopher@nightshade">christ=
opher@nightshade</a>&nbsp;</div><div>----------------------&nbsp;</div><div=
>OS: Guix System d4ffa9630277fa8699c783c08381d688626d4bc3 x86_64&nbsp;</div=
><div>Host: GA-880GM-UD2H&nbsp;</div><div>Kernel: 5.12.5-gnu&nbsp;</div><di=
v>Uptime: 1 hour, 30 mins&nbsp;</div><div>Packages: 107 (guix-system), 93 (=
guix-user)&nbsp;</div><div>Shell: bash 5.0.16&nbsp;</div><div>Resolution: 1=
920x1200&nbsp;</div><div>DE: GNOME 3.34.5&nbsp;</div><div>Theme: Adwaita [G=
TK2/3]&nbsp;</div><div>Icons: Adwaita [GTK2/3]&nbsp;</div><div>Terminal: ki=
tty&nbsp;</div><div>CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 455 (3) @ 3.300GHz&nbsp;</div><di=
v>GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3&nbsp;</div><div>Memory: 1573MiB / 7957=
MiB&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"mailto:christopher@nightshade=
">christopher@nightshade</a> ~$ guix describe</div><div>Generation 5	May 22=
 2021 09:43:30	(current)</div><div>&nbsp; guix d4ffa96</div><div>&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;repository URL: <a href=3D"https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/g=
uix.git">https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git</a></div><div>&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;branch: master</div><div>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;commit: d4ff=
a9630277fa8699c783c08381d688626d4bc3</div><div><br></div><div><span><pre>--=
 <br></pre><div>Christopher Howard</div><div>blog: <a href=3D"https://libre=
hacker.com">https://librehacker.com</a></div><div>social: <a href=3D"https:=
//gnusocial.club/librehacker">https://gnusocial.club/librehacker</a></div><=
/span></div></body></html>

--=-STz/X+4pIRh1d+lBXLMk--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#48591: Acknowledgement (ugrep: illegal instruction)
Message-ID: <handler.48591.B.16217147918570.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 48591
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 20:20:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
48591: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D48591
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 22:47:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B48591.162172360822524 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <f0d7658e13c42b64794712598504b47038ee9fb6.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 14:46:13 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-DNXE7ND+SBaBL110jLEF"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>


--=-DNXE7ND+SBaBL110jLEF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

christopher@nightshade ~$ guix challenge ugrep
/gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12 contents
differ:
  local hash: 1yf9752hprihmhwnqlhaffkmwmkd3scwzr8dqy7d78vcy70qjkn6
  
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12
: 1ifdjmscb07pacxwcs2408zi12yrxxf0zdwzz800xlccp5x53m7r
  differing file:
    /bin/ugrep

1 store items were analyzed:
  - 0 (0.0%) were identical
  - 1 (100.0%) differed
  - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

-- 
Christopher Howard
blog: https://librehacker.com
social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker

--=-DNXE7ND+SBaBL110jLEF
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html dir=3D"ltr"><head></head><body style=3D"text-align:left; direction:lt=
r;"><div><a href=3D"mailto:christopher@nightshade">christopher@nightshade</=
a> ~$ guix challenge ugrep</div><div>/gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfj=
rvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12 contents differ:</div><div>&nbsp; local hash: 1yf9752hpr=
ihmhwnqlhaffkmwmkd3scwzr8dqy7d78vcy70qjkn6</div><div>&nbsp; <a href=3D"http=
s://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12"=
>https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.=
1.12</a>: 1ifdjmscb07pacxwcs2408zi12yrxxf0zdwzz800xlccp5x53m7r</div><div>&n=
bsp; differing file:</div><div>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/bin/ugrep</div><div=
><br></div><div>1 store items were analyzed:</div><div>&nbsp; - 0 (0.0%) we=
re identical</div><div>&nbsp; - 1 (100.0%) differed</div><div>&nbsp; - 0 (0=
.0%) were inconclusive</div><div><br></div><div><span><pre>-- <br></pre><di=
v>Christopher Howard</div><div>blog: <a href=3D"https://librehacker.com">ht=
tps://librehacker.com</a></div><div>social: <a href=3D"https://gnusocial.cl=
ub/librehacker">https://gnusocial.club/librehacker</a></div></span></div></=
body></html>

--=-DNXE7ND+SBaBL110jLEF--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
Resent-From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:23:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B48591.16218769543917 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:22:23 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <YKvgz5XUkPoL9EMO@HIDDEN>
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> However, the command I am running to
> rebuild ugrep without grafts or substitutes is rebuilding everything
> all the way back to bootstrap, so it probably will not be completed for
> a day or two:
> 
> guix gc -D $(guix build --no-grafts ugrep); guix build --no-substitutes 
> ugrep

Do this instead:

$ guix environment --no-grafts ugrep -- guix build --no-grafts --no-substitutes ugrep

That way, you can use substitutes for ugrep's dependencies, but then
build ugrep from source.

I hope it helps!

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:17:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B48591.162509140527889 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48591
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 48591-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B48591.162509140527889
          (code B ref 48591); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:17:01 +0000
Received: (at 48591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2021 22:16:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lyiVg-0007Fl-Nv
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:16:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:54148)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1lyiVb-0007FC-4u
 for 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:16:39 -0400
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GFbKY5jKjzF492;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1625091393; bh=zoffJc3ziZenHE8WyFVEmEaGV1f50GgconR4DCCGKWY=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=E+wA0/dXBlOxgKnfxgE6PfPk26lxVXxQQ6uzL+T4wUumqwERCScGAeOxgdDryUsjb
 m1mN6DEA91O7vfuX+PuVk5EenN+NUvneKfNNb6sd5iZofnsRRg3bf853KFkR8sE9Ey
 +EbGWcoBZ94M2cx1NH/3xJzdjwuo6X77sCO8BW80=
X-Riseup-User-ID: B4CA4116A1EDADEAE7646F412A6A5325F78DC26ADEC3E04371730303175878B6
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GFbKX4Sp8z5vkx;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:41:11 +0200
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20210630234111.26a7e7f7@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <YKvgz5XUkPoL9EMO@HIDDEN>
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
 <YKvgz5XUkPoL9EMO@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Mon, 24 May 2021 13:22:23 -0400
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote:

> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > However, the command I am running to
> > rebuild ugrep without grafts or substitutes is rebuilding everything
> > all the way back to bootstrap, so it probably will not be completed
> > for a day or two:
> > 
> > guix gc -D $(guix build --no-grafts ugrep); guix build
> > --no-substitutes ugrep  
> 
> Do this instead:
> 
> $ guix environment --no-grafts ugrep -- guix build --no-grafts
> --no-substitutes ugrep
> 
> That way, you can use substitutes for ugrep's dependencies, but then
> build ugrep from source.
> 
> I hope it helps!
> 
> 
> 

TIL about that. There really ought to be a more obvious way to do that.

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
Resent-From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 02:24:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B48591.162519260419452 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48591
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 48591-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B48591.162519260419452
          (code B ref 48591); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 02:24:02 +0000
Received: (at 48591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 02:23:24 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lz8pw-00053g-Ho
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:23:24 -0400
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39033)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1lz8pv-00053T-Bj
 for 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:23:23 -0400
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13A35C019B;
 Thu,  1 Jul 2021 22:23:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:23:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=T+TwhQtOrGx7Y935sFajyLX4
 okVQUvs4aWsqhOg/+kU=; b=N0Z9cvk1NGw6mNMZdK4UZFb+/9QJhPk/k6A8FGUm
 D0w1J9JqOAv+992glxv/xnVNH0HqL/nuh6+SSIOx6a9chb1RXdER7rOiTCjHp3dD
 UK0IFvWIPbvHSt8cdtbVq+eGkNQSWFZvPUwK9RNso4XTKNO0d9DhQVkMWJc9Mqkz
 cMU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=T+TwhQ
 tOrGx7Y935sFajyLX4okVQUvs4aWsqhOg/+kU=; b=loU8m2tFUcMOWEhCeX9xfM
 XT7XkjlQxzR9YCxn377DT97Qe3TkcTI3TXq5l0lHrB0CXFlZ/78NvZOlDCPSLUdA
 xMfFKmJhPW755hOF8mU9/Jy9ijXzIRnlSNCnlBfzqVhwyzG3WSGfLsTBTIHsqG1m
 SLTwy3lhhd2D1rCsXj5ko5mB3o2IQLNCPfaBPXnPwmFEC1CFIvJOaZWv+7/Lr3mM
 xrL5XHxain4ERqfHFiMkbHoGtXr+ln5EMApksv+G86ZLtVFSIO/6ehCRog75+W0u
 DxrCSplQe5Sno1c8uQ6od79bLfhro2R/8DPpMH7JW8tCpHwJanzEEVPuWDa2V72w
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lXjeYJXAKXLHmxjP8KcHeIArgq0cYhRcKBv0oBr0JSRiLoMS0zapaA>
 <xme:lXjeYJn5Hib8l_Gxv6Us5qzunPIMbAziH9e-yVWesy57Krag_7nRw9AVdmsj7tlYY
 N7XZ48duaiLi2n2ag>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:lXjeYFYU3M27RLIymSNSfoogzHr1JkBTsInuzW_nrik2ru4UpiZK_AbLv39tlWTC1hGIFxP_TmXCG0GL-0nycl8_Jg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeeijedgheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh
 rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth
 gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev
 gfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvg
 hosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lXjeYMVYJfnQjno9lIxrRXnH2IbsQ55n2px6gA6J6uIWzqzgoh3MiQ>
 <xmx:lXjeYDmOh4rIJHcFltTjURBc19Q_MnnElRuaKuMSQgLalBmAep46OQ>
 <xmx:lXjeYJdg8dAS4cWDHdpdPL8hMsyBd_c2yI6XrewG549P21r2xxjn3w>
 <xmx:lXjeYLvXwpo0AZLn0VRa6opv5KiXW7-LdDwqthhGf_URIsK7aE39zQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu,
 1 Jul 2021 22:23:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:23:14 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <YN54kgFT9LGxD4VO@HIDDEN>
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
 <YKvgz5XUkPoL9EMO@HIDDEN> <20210630234111.26a7e7f7@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210630234111.26a7e7f7@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:41:11PM +0200, raingloom wrote:
> TIL about that. There really ought to be a more obvious way to do that.

Agreed! It's a common use case.

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#48591: ugrep: illegal instruction
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 11:25:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.48591.B48591.16252250662667 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48591
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>
Cc: 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 48591-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B48591.16252250662667
          (code B ref 48591); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 11:25:01 +0000
Received: (at 48591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 11:24:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lzHHV-0000gx-PR
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:24:26 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:54243)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lzHHT-0000gk-Mh
 for 48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:24:24 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id w13so6439520wmc.3
 for <48591 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=G9ChTeLSpzjm/8ec49Q5iIzjSd3OKYOTxWzB4EeMk6w=;
 b=f+AJ1wjNVrj3P7CGAvoMatuoDMtHRDrXcimWb8XyKazj86aRkBVPD7lPHRFx6efyE0
 OJ2gSRzGCnwLAFu4uYNKfg6whCcF0CDLI9sePj8ygRtp8j9d8jMYbgJ4O4IfkYyHh4EL
 wS5kaMC3k0GdFYhO0VKtCyxivqAnrxr0GKXnMfXKWuiFEYeLUOD58dtBtxdLjGiLED4/
 x6W3bKfhsFcbYbs1k9jMru7OLp2q0w+rJkAchN5XOLujir3cbV/5bSLPXBh/WLSRroTp
 CHNnChHZIY/P8gqLafn90kSRYe0UxxfjB26P+rdesfmVzRZG+i1AlCMtPP5Umm88aOx3
 8mkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=G9ChTeLSpzjm/8ec49Q5iIzjSd3OKYOTxWzB4EeMk6w=;
 b=k1BZtmzhxpSwKcvhAtA0HJsoIvLdlZhQ+ykNQ+lyjnmiP/tuWT0ccE9lvHPziF7UVJ
 /ehAa927MgytLW44ns1wgZl6Spm4AhdU1zM+KuOpa+g3W+X44q3XV5yqgq+upDBHNtqe
 MOmiyinMYw5nadsA6DGMrzQMTlXUYTq+oYwXDzXoe25D3vx8zXGKuAM7+qAuBvCRXZK3
 GbK/ShflRhk7irRTcWOQ6v+9468nsaldfSlcbChO1bp5XvGpxOAWmt5AdFDI/f1MWr1w
 QfcVwzujqnTh2/So3iXR1h3Lf0UtwvHYIExT3WD3uwdMRvgqq62WzQuwGjv8+rGXfUzT
 lXBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LNssZouXegg8UEeDkQjU9LmNomaaFwJRjneXykB5QE6TH3y4w
 Y//upRe/h5taCSrbAglO3BpClV22v6g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkys1YjxYPeX2L9whfmTTLdgSmvv0nlOGo+/ul/shE0SfgfjDUMi31E3hO+d5ofE5/52Ye6w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3205:: with SMTP id
 r5mr6534361wmp.75.1625225057777; 
 Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm2888634wru.33.2021.07.02.04.24.17
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
References: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:24:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <14ed9ebaa4c203c17aacbd514597c0030a07a44f.camel@HIDDEN>
 (Christopher Howard's message of "Sat, 22 May 2021 12:19:30 -0800")
Message-ID: <87o8blm00y.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 12:19, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN=
om> wrote:

> I'm sure this will also be a reproducibility bug,

Indeed, the package =E2=80=99ugrep=E2=80=99 is not reproducible:

 guix build ugrep --no-grafts -q
 guix build ugrep --no-grafts -q --check -K
 diff --no-dereference -r /gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep=
-3.1.12{,-check}
 Binary files /gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12/bin/=
ugrep and /gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12-check/bi=
n/ugrep differ

The next step is to investigate with diffoscope.


Well, another data point =E2=80=93 maybe Berlin has an issue =E2=80=93 beca=
use I get:

  guix challenge ugrep --substitute-urls=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org https:/=
/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org"
  /gnu/store/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep-3.1.12 contents differ:
    local hash: 1ifdjmscb07pacxwcs2408zi12yrxxf0zdwzz800xlccp5x53m7r
    https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k-ugrep=
-3.1.12: 1ifdjmscb07pacxwcs2408zi12yrxxf0zdwzz800xlccp5x53m7r
    https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/a6x7rv7xi3d2pw205znmnha9qfjrvs7k=
-ugrep-3.1.12: 1yf9752hprihmhwnqlhaffkmwmkd3scwzr8dqy7d78vcy70qjkn6

  guix hash -r $(guix build --no-grafts ugrep)-check
  1yf9752hprihmhwnqlhaffkmwmkd3scwzr8dqy7d78vcy70qjkn6

I fetch by default the substitutes from ci that why =E2=80=9Clocal hash=E2=
=80=9C and ci
are the same; but my local build with =E2=80=98guix build --check=E2=80=99 =
gives the
same hash as bordeaux.


All the best,
simon

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 09:02:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 05:02:16 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1m3EIx-0004OF-Tq
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:02:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:37563)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1m3EIv-0004Nj-3N
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:02:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id i94so29441043wri.4
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=date:message-id:to:from:subject;
 bh=NUh6AyzGsbNnDfEWPmNPyv2XQQ0mk83ttRm7ZsxKbzM=;
 b=bLfbvIshc+dxge90xVqwplgorhSYWBJ9M4/mIBs8b9UhqhH04vfVbTT+GW7RicsqOu
 BOvhRo6EjO/AKS7SlGgTftCM4+60XhF6hyXIGx7faReYTw49UFdzpwehlGJEGEh4qEPS
 b0QBbu1PNcBegXlxHkiLjsS/QuDdR/2R/VKT2jdrHJc5IiehX9WTfs9o3/HHzGIQaYCZ
 r7ZSfCVd2La/n9PyhJyU6viQczmdQLtUzz0NKK/27ut+/NsjsTiJ8bJPSKAFAq0yXMVD
 AfhP8if2dzZ2NFQDrD3C+jA872BiU/yI9d6bIrC3y7cA1bjoZ7dA6g53RUmuzrfhsa4c
 mV9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject;
 bh=NUh6AyzGsbNnDfEWPmNPyv2XQQ0mk83ttRm7ZsxKbzM=;
 b=KUWJl6qWshAKfH7v4nS1xOkMxnsS4ohic1He7CLKskXBfRnlQ9JxCZ+30hXlccGHpc
 lXBlOpmMYKVslurwSO5adlGxePvF4Ci3hiS5ehSDY7jXlpArM1yN7aCaYOX7muwSUGeD
 Wfd2k+qC8cfLjbrPrH0wPavZfe3K52ASQRVTcKO3cXiXPHcsmFxYjc+IBzmLmcF6gtZm
 6xvmfEqmyUi5Nia8kJHBvUIgMPQCQFK315s+NsNLTvCrWyBVYOhkCEwTHF3Ce6swFcLz
 GAF5/29l1nRCSM8aJ8zJtqgEXk2Y0lKmhNbqL4clxa3gspfTslRk6ehBeVFmfXyU0MNM
 isWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tqQIrwa+Pjow9I67o9xLtEcFxClrFDMzgPJh87V7gSlFxsBCD
 TRum99CUju32STWJxwbCh/VYPadxRKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyadglpqstxDjthnKHnQpb1kjErlH7vYUpCQlUWVZy+h0h7/Xx1CsnjKnO54+7Ythn3KUxDyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e4d:: with SMTP id r13mr4288443wrt.224.1626166927133; 
 Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n41sm1661130wms.26.2021.07.13.02.02.06
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:45:30 +0200
Message-Id: <86zguqob4l.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #48591
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

retitle 48591 ugrep: reproducibility issues
quit

Last modified: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.