GNU bug report logs - #48802
Possibly nonfree font (font-ubuntu)

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ron Nazarov <noisytoot <at> disroot.org>

Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:02:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 48802 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 48802 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to report-nonfree <at> fsf.org, bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48802; Package guix. (Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Ron Nazarov <noisytoot <at> disroot.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to report-nonfree <at> fsf.org, bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ron Nazarov <noisytoot <at> disroot.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Possibly nonfree font (font-ubuntu)
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:01:32 +0100

Guix contains font-ubuntu, which is licensed under the Ubuntu Font
License v1.0, which has not been approved by the FSF, and is considered
nonfree by Debian and Fedora, according to <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(typeface)#Ubuntu_Font_Licence>.
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#48802; Package guix. (Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 48802 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: 48802 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: noisytoot <at> disroot.org
Subject: Re: bug#48802: Possibly nonfree font (font-ubuntu)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:41:50 +0200

I've pushed a923127d3051841e4187ee5e817f6c85e6387c3e, which drops this
font, but I missed that openshot has font-ubuntu as input.  I'll try to
make it build with font-dejavu instead.  Wish me luck!
Reply sent to Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Ron Nazarov <noisytoot <at> disroot.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:54:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 48802-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: 48802-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: noisytoot <at> disroot.org
Subject: Re: bug#48802: Possibly nonfree font (font-ubuntu)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:53:48 +0200

Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2021, 08:41 +0200 schrieb Leo Prikler:
> I've pushed a923127d3051841e4187ee5e817f6c85e6387c3e, which drops
> this
> font, but I missed that openshot has font-ubuntu as input.  I'll try
> to
> make it build with font-dejavu instead.  Wish me luck!
Aaaand it's fixed.  Please pardon my blunder, Guix should pull now :)
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 298 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.