Received: (at 49220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 06:15:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 02:15:11 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lwf7P-0007bP-16
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:15:11 -0400
Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:45023)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwf7N-0007TY-5g
for 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:15:09 -0400
Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id u14so262163pga.11
for <49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
bh=1o1We9PXySqauvimk/XsfGspo5hOW0gLnTPXZh0re9k=;
b=U21fdDL/nYXVyqb0H7Zj7K+RM8l7SroEQW2sIsBh2vLkoGuEVVJ48Wl/ddtMAjbeX9
p4lOQnipH1uN3GAEKAFa/+eCE6Kg10ZexjgfdxZZdFufA10YlfhOQ2n5LWAzvFf1NblP
eyiykAvnsrHoMMDlCTQg3dRhmTW9EtVx98qq3EmYE+vZu4s8uV0lGaO/o+1EloXOtZ+j
xWAdHFL/0M8FSKlJHmc98DkUV0VaCUMKgYrNDnEkuGaBnOeb00C6NujwGCXuDx4f/Ej6
jYAcwyiMM5C5nVBF2LM9A9OAnhwi6n0wFoDcSBbN79WvBu5ShkAw1Q09uaHoadzJMfbi
lk4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
:mime-version;
bh=1o1We9PXySqauvimk/XsfGspo5hOW0gLnTPXZh0re9k=;
b=bj1mFcl6iB4fV4rDgnCD2NfORXBtdYNrmQ7E/j8upyJcmPkIX2O9PrE/iFK9DwQn+b
cYrdoABHXknZA8Xq2Iaw/pmBdzAXIGu1ELoekAccSl3nHNGDV7Iiu4q1FgPumjT/nXeU
3qjVNXtoT23DIMatdTgW/W6x/u3LtkzlZoxmS8N5+/LDQt8/jNzVc4Qlq4IOXCJ6fWPc
Q4xoYolEKsp7lWduII+v9zcuM/x/pNCB8xAZUuS/kk0hz8iGeaBvi57zYGCiknbIxIZN
KlPSDVAuzSZ6ple6FL/NjdqRjrV3uMu3cZ+M+H6IjmeLbk/bp22/3B0B5h0Z+Kh5Wz2u
Y5QQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qRTY9UBPdECAwyC7YUscms3vbsIbTUywVRodsOjXGgP9BWkv+
KQKpdDFW/Rk6V9jAYtdew+XXJ6B0cSKV2A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeEox6U2c1Z0Kj9+e8LRWL2e9OXWRjXnSDAexvzDP3ICxs40PbRgMDPJiQmfK7LBek0JYP9w==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:93bb:0:b029:307:31a3:ad3d with SMTP id
x27-20020aa793bb0000b029030731a3ad3dmr8910591pff.65.1624601703042;
Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::24aa])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm2621517pgn.46.2021.06.24.23.15.02
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>
To: luajit@HIDDEN
Subject: LuaJIT on powerpc64le-linux-gnu (POWER9)?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:01 -0700
Message-ID: <87im224gii.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49220
Cc: 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi LuaJIT community,
Is anyone in the LuaJIT community actively working on adding support for
the powerpc64le architecture? Specifically, I am wondering about the
powerpc64le-linux-gnu triplet, running on POWER9-based systems like the
Talos II and Blackbird sold by Raptor Computing Systems.
I ask because LuaJIT has been packaged for Guix, but it currently fails
to build on this platform, as explained in the following Guix bug
report:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49220
Based on the error output, it seems that this platform just isn't
supported yet:
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
=3D=3D=3D=3D Building LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3 =3D=3D=3D=3D
make -C src
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJI=
T-2.1.0-beta3/src'
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'vm_ppc64.dasc', needed by 'host/buildv=
m_arch.h'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJIT=
-2.1.0-beta3/src'
make: *** [Makefile:113: default] Error 2
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I have CC'd the Guix bug report for this issue. When replying, if you
could please keep 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org in the CC list so that your
replies will be recorded in the bug report, that would be helpful. That
will make it easier for Guix contributors to follow the conversation.
Best regards,
=2D-=20
Chris Marusich
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=0Vsj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#49220; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 06:05:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 02:05:09 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lwexh-0007B1-EG
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:09 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49042)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwexe-0007As-PA
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:08 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45852)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>)
id 1lwexe-0003bX-Hn
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:06 -0400
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]:33451)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>)
id 1lwexZ-0005Og-VL
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:04 -0400
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id f10so4206129plg.0
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
bh=N9Ns/ffb5nhmJaQKDctexsPj5mN6RFLSeVBT+SoS/0M=;
b=sxvidhR4TlZ5njE1yYqFLkxnjoosIqJO0paxuCopAj+oNz6/O4jQaxayjwCvmHKs0K
2av5m3Y3f8RP4dxskrgrKomk9WataMmNaDJEE2Fb8PXgMUW5DkP0Y8QTkkAlydpK1PIK
SpEFHYEXb2jABjgv6UVPj02QTdznTOa/QycmyLPeFHdzT8jNeQ/8l8J8Va7c9gcLML3J
hgUOeIqTYU3V+cyEhh0EGUwquIk6cV7nEBDCYLlKQ4Jq5nZJY2qxh139AwUFbX7kKtkv
/HP2AWcQt6dUEOkJGfzNsfQCAwKszdfjRjuJ05IbcZVaOLrYUjgmZt7/ex5RSRiJ+63/
ApYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
:mime-version;
bh=N9Ns/ffb5nhmJaQKDctexsPj5mN6RFLSeVBT+SoS/0M=;
b=AlV0Qk56p5ctOysCrKZyk8cYdjjPrMfg/4MHIMBNOlLVv4xbLvn3s/VwNDWk2ShyRC
5aT5UJixM+ii0oeU09vPI34yHX00wPnZtyowjCWhhKqyHLnLWG3UQ/uOUHaeB3gwSmfF
Ryn1ytzNuo16wbRwN7jiN0YtxuhMtQkbZ3klbYZRzStNgzqBdwaUrCdWA1sOH2G9kCpH
kMAkomuUpA5x5O8W0LCbCYyUoqzd36/gknbPVsG7OPxpW7K1bslv9lcFFksk+qsIekzG
Ltqz8769wmViwmZskzReTs3j5711sbGrO1N8VR5ewdDHQfRANZuiPPlpLtpp+Rs1dHeb
wZbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YoSHs7sj58um0LyUaE9wVxSnKvDIOZDL4mQrIoSHVSONxpF9R
rB1FlGJIFhwiSakLLt94JsHHCjMYuu8G6A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZ73E6O3OI1Cix4rJCb3W24z0YpNBP3jsLrYmWd9CJNtnt7A7hkrJp/I22J4fS1iMemOrltQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2403:b029:ef:9419:b914 with SMTP id
e3-20020a1709032403b02900ef9419b914mr7840050plo.59.1624601099932;
Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::24aa])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm9874305pjg.32.2021.06.24.23.04.58
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: luajit doesn't support powerpc64le
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:55 -0700
Message-ID: <87pmwa4gzc.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b;
envelope-from=cmmarusich@HIDDEN; helo=mail-pl1-x62b.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
When attempting to build luajit on powerpc64le-linux, you will get
errors like this:
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
=3D=3D=3D=3D Building LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3 =3D=3D=3D=3D
make -C src
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJI=
T-2.1.0-beta3/src'
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)"
| ^~~~~
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'vm_ppc64.dasc', needed by 'host/buildv=
m_arch.h'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJIT=
-2.1.0-beta3/src'
make: *** [Makefile:113: default] Error 2
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This has downstream impacts, such as being unable to build LuaJITTeX.
If we can't use LuaJIT on powerpc64le-linux, we should probably remove
it from the luajit package's list of supported systems.
I checked their email list and website, but I can't find information
about whether the LuaJIT project is actively working on support for
powerpc64le architecture specifically. I'll ask their email list
(luajit@HIDDEN) in a moment, and we'll see what they say.
=2D-=20
Chris
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=hLir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#49220; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.