Received: (at 49220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 06:15:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 02:15:11 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lwf7P-0007bP-16 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:15:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:45023) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwf7N-0007TY-5g for 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:15:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id u14so262163pga.11 for <49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=1o1We9PXySqauvimk/XsfGspo5hOW0gLnTPXZh0re9k=; b=U21fdDL/nYXVyqb0H7Zj7K+RM8l7SroEQW2sIsBh2vLkoGuEVVJ48Wl/ddtMAjbeX9 p4lOQnipH1uN3GAEKAFa/+eCE6Kg10ZexjgfdxZZdFufA10YlfhOQ2n5LWAzvFf1NblP eyiykAvnsrHoMMDlCTQg3dRhmTW9EtVx98qq3EmYE+vZu4s8uV0lGaO/o+1EloXOtZ+j xWAdHFL/0M8FSKlJHmc98DkUV0VaCUMKgYrNDnEkuGaBnOeb00C6NujwGCXuDx4f/Ej6 jYAcwyiMM5C5nVBF2LM9A9OAnhwi6n0wFoDcSBbN79WvBu5ShkAw1Q09uaHoadzJMfbi lk4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=1o1We9PXySqauvimk/XsfGspo5hOW0gLnTPXZh0re9k=; b=bj1mFcl6iB4fV4rDgnCD2NfORXBtdYNrmQ7E/j8upyJcmPkIX2O9PrE/iFK9DwQn+b cYrdoABHXknZA8Xq2Iaw/pmBdzAXIGu1ELoekAccSl3nHNGDV7Iiu4q1FgPumjT/nXeU 3qjVNXtoT23DIMatdTgW/W6x/u3LtkzlZoxmS8N5+/LDQt8/jNzVc4Qlq4IOXCJ6fWPc Q4xoYolEKsp7lWduII+v9zcuM/x/pNCB8xAZUuS/kk0hz8iGeaBvi57zYGCiknbIxIZN KlPSDVAuzSZ6ple6FL/NjdqRjrV3uMu3cZ+M+H6IjmeLbk/bp22/3B0B5h0Z+Kh5Wz2u Y5QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qRTY9UBPdECAwyC7YUscms3vbsIbTUywVRodsOjXGgP9BWkv+ KQKpdDFW/Rk6V9jAYtdew+XXJ6B0cSKV2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeEox6U2c1Z0Kj9+e8LRWL2e9OXWRjXnSDAexvzDP3ICxs40PbRgMDPJiQmfK7LBek0JYP9w== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:93bb:0:b029:307:31a3:ad3d with SMTP id x27-20020aa793bb0000b029030731a3ad3dmr8910591pff.65.1624601703042; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::24aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm2621517pgn.46.2021.06.24.23.15.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN> To: luajit@HIDDEN Subject: LuaJIT on powerpc64le-linux-gnu (POWER9)? Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:15:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87im224gii.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49220 Cc: 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi LuaJIT community, Is anyone in the LuaJIT community actively working on adding support for the powerpc64le architecture? Specifically, I am wondering about the powerpc64le-linux-gnu triplet, running on POWER9-based systems like the Talos II and Blackbird sold by Raptor Computing Systems. I ask because LuaJIT has been packaged for Guix, but it currently fails to build on this platform, as explained in the following Guix bug report: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49220 Based on the error output, it seems that this platform just isn't supported yet: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- =3D=3D=3D=3D Building LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3 =3D=3D=3D=3D make -C src make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJI= T-2.1.0-beta3/src' lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'vm_ppc64.dasc', needed by 'host/buildv= m_arch.h'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJIT= -2.1.0-beta3/src' make: *** [Makefile:113: default] Error 2 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I have CC'd the Guix bug report for this issue. When replying, if you could please keep 49220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org in the CC list so that your replies will be recorded in the bug report, that would be helpful. That will make it easier for Guix contributors to follow the conversation. Best regards, =2D-=20 Chris Marusich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAmDVdGUVHGNtbWFydXNp Y2hAZ21haWwuY29tAAoJEN1AmhXYIkad5y8QAJLBJHbwcSVccjTkqthHoRx2F/DJ h3EzeAygnF4HDRe/1uL12epPB2Lujvdz933oLquh60aHFL8H+tH3XeYYvv7fPbi8 SACXPoBY0Yjmg3w3dS84YEmTi/O8mkVpIFMvxODmfo9AzMFqAeEnta4mIGN130iC 5cR++d+SZr/ZX4KnvoMxkVeUaVUX7bZRRS542TTcoRC8UvHHPg0tJnplvhCzeyBd XcRpJ0uM/PX+5YHNeLdhiqS33lJqtgqieJOoI3v+GJTyP1Y136kcUdolHaOfEUmn //JNf3g8K2QT+PRAEwi7QLXTZmsxIWCXz2tcD6h3HxrMYwkEx1eHXXAqt79WO98z dCzKT82MU6cKjqcnFTwOhb9eWjBNvS1Gz8QOCAZcIIUwMRDchc2nIM3GMRhwpgK8 AoqtJKxhXgAjXI3xvWgyY/7JdCVnKNvax4DSPkEALCl9fzgVRFM0S1lUA19bYcXQ csrq0/hqpMiuWh3wQtbUhYorEtZJphB2Y2TtLreAhowtMWLW8pYJ00ivUuMJFCIx Jfy/vNJhmFPFdtpM09GRRFIbXB9l73XUct+48vcQxkaPvpZYnf3h6odvXxbvEe/H Nz686NNL08PH5t0WcnLGf5/IUQiKiUfr2b7TxzeHbaaQTeBsbRtNDlm3rCGU32mY XLiLkftcAScwTpa0 =0Vsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#49220
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 06:05:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 02:05:09 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lwexh-0007B1-EG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwexe-0007As-PA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwexe-0003bX-Hn for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]:33451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>) id 1lwexZ-0005Og-VL for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:05:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id f10so4206129plg.0 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:05:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=N9Ns/ffb5nhmJaQKDctexsPj5mN6RFLSeVBT+SoS/0M=; b=sxvidhR4TlZ5njE1yYqFLkxnjoosIqJO0paxuCopAj+oNz6/O4jQaxayjwCvmHKs0K 2av5m3Y3f8RP4dxskrgrKomk9WataMmNaDJEE2Fb8PXgMUW5DkP0Y8QTkkAlydpK1PIK SpEFHYEXb2jABjgv6UVPj02QTdznTOa/QycmyLPeFHdzT8jNeQ/8l8J8Va7c9gcLML3J hgUOeIqTYU3V+cyEhh0EGUwquIk6cV7nEBDCYLlKQ4Jq5nZJY2qxh139AwUFbX7kKtkv /HP2AWcQt6dUEOkJGfzNsfQCAwKszdfjRjuJ05IbcZVaOLrYUjgmZt7/ex5RSRiJ+63/ ApYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=N9Ns/ffb5nhmJaQKDctexsPj5mN6RFLSeVBT+SoS/0M=; b=AlV0Qk56p5ctOysCrKZyk8cYdjjPrMfg/4MHIMBNOlLVv4xbLvn3s/VwNDWk2ShyRC 5aT5UJixM+ii0oeU09vPI34yHX00wPnZtyowjCWhhKqyHLnLWG3UQ/uOUHaeB3gwSmfF Ryn1ytzNuo16wbRwN7jiN0YtxuhMtQkbZ3klbYZRzStNgzqBdwaUrCdWA1sOH2G9kCpH kMAkomuUpA5x5O8W0LCbCYyUoqzd36/gknbPVsG7OPxpW7K1bslv9lcFFksk+qsIekzG Ltqz8769wmViwmZskzReTs3j5711sbGrO1N8VR5ewdDHQfRANZuiPPlpLtpp+Rs1dHeb wZbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YoSHs7sj58um0LyUaE9wVxSnKvDIOZDL4mQrIoSHVSONxpF9R rB1FlGJIFhwiSakLLt94JsHHCjMYuu8G6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZ73E6O3OI1Cix4rJCb3W24z0YpNBP3jsLrYmWd9CJNtnt7A7hkrJp/I22J4fS1iMemOrltQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2403:b029:ef:9419:b914 with SMTP id e3-20020a1709032403b02900ef9419b914mr7840050plo.59.1624601099932; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::24aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm9874305pjg.32.2021.06.24.23.04.58 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: luajit doesn't support powerpc64le Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 23:04:55 -0700 Message-ID: <87pmwa4gzc.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=cmmarusich@HIDDEN; helo=mail-pl1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, When attempting to build luajit on powerpc64le-linux, you will get errors like this: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- =3D=3D=3D=3D Building LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3 =3D=3D=3D=3D make -C src make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJI= T-2.1.0-beta3/src' lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ lj_arch.h:428:2: error: #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" 428 | #error "No support for PowerPC 64 bit mode (yet)" | ^~~~~ make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'vm_ppc64.dasc', needed by 'host/buildv= m_arch.h'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-luajit-2.1.0-beta3.drv-0/LuaJIT= -2.1.0-beta3/src' make: *** [Makefile:113: default] Error 2 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This has downstream impacts, such as being unable to build LuaJITTeX. If we can't use LuaJIT on powerpc64le-linux, we should probably remove it from the luajit package's list of supported systems. I checked their email list and website, but I can't find information about whether the LuaJIT project is actively working on support for powerpc64le architecture specifically. I'll ask their email list (luajit@HIDDEN) in a moment, and we'll see what they say. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAmDVcgcVHGNtbWFydXNp Y2hAZ21haWwuY29tAAoJEN1AmhXYIkadjjsQAJI9LDceg988AkRV1u5G20d2E7er jktewEstXs2PFlBa47vS6iaB58oDdW1B2HLu0Tk3zrOTx1btcHYyFPLyPtf7Zwm/ mZWhG8aUcWLvyrlM4GFGEXupQroH0R8NGszpvfRK1RHzPbgKcz783UQx9Y+phWgZ IYVM0g/Q6HuMz4E8wZnCExj/YpTbFQcTvtL2rsJuN3X27pJeNe9+5mz0vVOO15L2 Evp4GirLkLDqj0tAc58ZsNxu+EFZyn9XHgbKbe63woG7Uxmcak00BlA8yrec6bun awifBjBNydCmLrmJFNV3up4eyOAXP4Nh7vVI0SBy5NlPodTAaXynUz2ycottDRft 1FuVqgQa01xwN2xoHpNTabFl8rflOa2ey7hqFVdPXf756V/GILyZWydJUyq5GmUY w4e+VCLsK06oZE/G4o7C44ZFVc+zweC/jdS5rj43mUyuBofkBnexYsMDRejpb+7t BG6skHndsk31WrDxAUkl6tJeKQIKscgvBVz2fOSbpf0wXgvltyim1j7jVth2+8+w fKsWuub/y7cgA4H845CeriUsY7ZUkoDGKVFDYwA15Yz/sp0ucTEcqDFlXIqcX3od nYq5oT7oEbH2zelw05GxSa9w95O18ACuRmGKr+Z7G9WWvyJ6eO2eI/03P9gw/c+w XlxPduSPlqtHBKZK =hLir -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#49220
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.