GNU bug report logs -
#49363
eof-object? is not exported from (ice-9 binary-ports)
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 49363 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49363
; Package
guile
.
(Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
According to the manual:
6.12.2 Binary I/O
-----------------
[...]
To use these routines, first include the binary I/O module:
(use-modules (ice-9 binary-ports))
[...]
The end-of-file object is unlike any other kind of object: it’s not a
pair, a symbol, or anything else. To check if a value is the
end-of-file object, use the ‘eof-object?’ predicate.
-- Scheme Procedure: eof-object? x
-- C Function: scm_eof_object_p (x)
Return ‘#t’ if X is an end-of-file object, or ‘#f’ otherwise.
However, eof-object? is not exported by (ice-9 binary-ports):
scheme@(guile-user)> (@ (ice-9 binary-ports) eof-object?)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Unbound variable: eof-object?
But it is imported from (ice-9 ports):
scheme@(guile-user) [1]> (@ (ice-9 ports) eof-object?)
$1 = #<procedure eof-object? (_)>
Could an appropriate export be added to (ice-9 binary-ports)?
Or the manual adjusted to note you need to import (ice-9 ports)
to get eof-object?
Greetings,
Maxime
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49363
; Package
guile
.
(Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:55:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 49363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Isn't eof-object? available in the default environment?
--
Linus Björnstam
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021, at 22:24, Maxime Devos wrote:
> According to the manual:
>
> 6.12.2 Binary I/O
> -----------------
>
> [...]
> To use these routines, first include the binary I/O module:
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 binary-ports))
>
> [...]
> The end-of-file object is unlike any other kind of object: it’s not a
> pair, a symbol, or anything else. To check if a value is the
> end-of-file object, use the ‘eof-object?’ predicate.
>
> -- Scheme Procedure: eof-object? x
> -- C Function: scm_eof_object_p (x)
> Return ‘#t’ if X is an end-of-file object, or ‘#f’ otherwise.
>
> However, eof-object? is not exported by (ice-9 binary-ports):
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (@ (ice-9 binary-ports) eof-object?)
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> Unbound variable: eof-object?
>
> But it is imported from (ice-9 ports):
>
> scheme@(guile-user) [1]> (@ (ice-9 ports) eof-object?)
> $1 = #<procedure eof-object? (_)>
>
> Could an appropriate export be added to (ice-9 binary-ports)?
> Or the manual adjusted to note you need to import (ice-9 ports)
> to get eof-object?
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime
>
> Attachments:
> * signature.asc
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49363
; Package
guile
.
(Sun, 04 Jul 2021 11:49:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 49363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Linus Björnstam schreef op zo 04-07-2021 om 07:54 [+0200]:
> Isn't eof-object? available in the default environment?
Yes, but I use (define-library ...) and (library ...) forms
instead of (define-module (...) ...) forms. When using
define-library or library, the ‘default’ environment is ignored.
I suppose I should import 'eof-object?' from (rnrs io ports)
as I am using RnRS library forms. Still, this seems a bug in
(ice-9 binary-ports) or the documentation and easy to fix.
Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 143 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.