GNU bug report logs - #49470
[PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 49470 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 49470 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:48:34 +0000

Hi Guix,

Here is a patch for python-beautysh, a bash beautifier.

Pypi release does not include tests and github release does not include a setup.py because it is using poetry instead.

What is the current recommended guix packaging practice for python projects that depend on poetry?

all best,

jgart

Message #8 received at 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.
Date: Thu,  8 Jul 2021 16:50:53 -0400

* gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-beautysh): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
index 2bb33dbd63..bde6ba851a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
@@ -357,6 +357,32 @@ features of the Python's built-in dict.")
 from a docstring rather than the other way around.")
    (license license:mpl2.0)))
 
+(define-public python-beautysh
+  (package
+    (name "python-beautysh")
+    (version "6.1.0")
+    (source
+      (origin
+        (method url-fetch)
+        (uri (pypi-uri "beautysh" version))
+        (sha256
+          (base32
+            "0i6mnxhl3v48fx4hnd2q03rxy3wg6v444kjjjrm61lvshz5llswn"))))
+    (build-system python-build-system)
+    ;; Pypi release does not include tests and github release does not include
+    ;; setup.py.
+    (arguments
+      `(#:tests? #f))
+    (propagated-inputs
+      `(("python-colorama" ,python-colorama)))
+    (home-page
+      "https://github.com/lovesegfault/beautysh")
+    (synopsis "Bash beautifier for the masses")
+    (description "@command{beautysh} beautifies bash scripts.  @command{beautysh}
+can be called from the command line or used as a module.  In tests with large
+Linux system Bash scripts, its error-free score was ~99%.")
+    (license license:expat)))
+
 (define-public python-cachetools
   (package
     (name "python-cachetools")
-- 
2.31.1

Message #11 received at 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: "jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de>, GNU Debbugs <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Cc: 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49470: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:43:41 -0400

tags 49470 moreinfo
thanks

Hi jgart,

"jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de> writes:

> Hi Guix,
>
> Here is a patch for python-beautysh, a bash beautifier.
>
> Pypi release does not include tests and github release does not
> include a setup.py because it is using poetry instead.
>
> What is the current recommended guix packaging practice for python projects that depend on poetry?

You can use python-pypa-build with python-poetry-core and override the
build and install phases as done in python-isort.

Could you attempt such a build?  That we could run the test suite.

Thanks,

Maxim

Message #16 received at 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: GNU Debbugs <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49470: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:54:06 -0500

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:43:41 -0400 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Could you attempt such a build?  That we could run the test suite.

Hi Maxim,

What branch should I try that from?

If master, do you know of another example package that does that that I can use as a reference?

thanks,

jgart

Message #19 received at 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: GNU Debbugs <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, 49470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49470: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-beautysh.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:12:59 -0500

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:43:41 -0400 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> build and install phases as done in python-isort.

oops missed that ;() Thanks, will try!

Message #24 received at 49470-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: 49470-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Closing
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 01:29:30 +0000

Hi,

Closing this patch as won't do.

Feel free to re-open if someone is interested in packaging this.

all best,

jgart

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.