GNU logs - #49730, boring messages


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49730: 28.0.50; There should be a way to mark a generalised variable as obsolete
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 07:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49730.B.162719852621078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49730
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 49730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162719852621078
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 07:36:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2021 07:35:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1m7YfV-0005Tu-U5
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:35:26 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58644)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m7YfR-0005Tk-QI
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:35:24 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49868)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m7YfR-0006mc-JL
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:35:21 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:59910)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m7YfQ-0006qs-3k
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:35:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:
 Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:
 Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:
 In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
 List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=KUmZxthv4+Cu+CrLj2WSOIuTR1lA4wFfb21NbRrG9sA=; b=ACi7Hf9FMPDd/+eKhB6wc+CE/o
 PgVzdOrTeuQE8BnMs7Lt2i9fM+XX3JrGj5F8q069Gd7zrjfml+2rQQBnQGeGWCxoeHuSBZriR55oV
 9cvYCJz4qJbjwTgaiyliPFrRicTRnhh4qL/ybogenyfskI+yskmy2ec8WmYgPjKpAU0g=;
Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m7YfL-0006c3-9D
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:35:17 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
X-Now-Playing: Bobbie Gentry's _The Girl From Chickasaw County (6): Fancy_:
 "Wedding Bell Blues"
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:35:14 +0200
Message-ID: <871r7myhfx.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  We don't have a way to make a generalised variable obsolete, 
 I think? I think it would be helpful if we had. I haven't looked at how to
 implement it, but marking the symbol in some way, and then having the byte
 compiler examine it (when expanding setf forms) and outputting a warning
 doesn't immediately seem [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@HIDDEN;
 helo=quimby.gnus.org
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


We don't have a way to make a generalised variable obsolete, I think?  I
think it would be helpful if we had.

I haven't looked at how to implement it, but marking the symbol in some
way, and then having the byte compiler examine it (when expanding setf
forms) and outputting a warning doesn't immediately seem impossible.


In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 55, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, cairo version 1.16.0)
 of 2021-07-24 built on elva
Repository revision: 5431a58e86d3f2579c1edf1dc8d7074de73ac694
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#49730: Acknowledgement (28.0.50; There should be a way to
 mark a generalised variable as obsolete)
Message-ID: <handler.49730.B.162719852621078.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <871r7myhfx.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 49730
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 49730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 07:36:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 49730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
49730: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49730
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems



Last modified: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 07:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.