Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:05:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 22 07:05:01 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38103 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oQ5Er-0008Ke-I8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:05:01 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Ep-0008KP-Sg for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:05:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TQ2sbyrFqJJV9V78SM1vV70qzqc6ArocEvSPngotxgI=; b=hroitQ33RoNn4buSQjQn/Bb8gY 6x2qZ51AbCCKXbuMIaFRcjSCz6A8J8JhOnIumh7n/mvhu1POr+NqsuyuPs5W1s30KcLnX8TZNs6JV XtPpLQ863OIqzNQMZiu7zE3oEqZ30HlmYWzsUXOLIsBp34HmVQ9bNMDaBRgyDBJCj23M=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Eh-0004fr-DU; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:04:53 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt In-Reply-To: <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 07 Nov 2021 19:31:25 +0200") References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN> <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: DMX Krew's _Sound of the Street_: "Sound of the Street" Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:04:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87tu648rov.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > The last case actually is more complex: the non-selected minibuffer > should not be highlighted when the Completions window is selected. > Only after moving point out of both the minibuffer and the [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > The last case actually is more complex: the non-selected minibuffer > should not be highlighted when the Completions window is selected. > Only after moving point out of both the minibuffer and the Completions > window, the minibuffer window should be highlighted. This was a year ago -- did you make any progress here?
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2021 17:47:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 07 12:47:34 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mjmGU-0006fA-H6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:47:34 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:53767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mjmGS-0006eD-3a for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:47:33 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E67BA40004; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:47:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt Organization: LINKOV.NET References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 19:31:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:14:46 +0100") Message-ID: <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el >> that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors >> with different faces: >> >> 1. selected window >> 2. non-selected window >> 3. selected minibuffer window >> 4. non-selected minibuffer window > > But... isn't think pretty much unrelated to windmove, too? I'd just > like to have the minibuffer light up when I've moved point somewhere > else (because it can be confusing sometimes). This was intended to address different requests. So far the requests were: to highlight the background of the selected window, to highlight the selected minibuffer window, and to highlight the non-selected active minibuffer. The last case actually is more complex: the non-selected minibuffer should not be highlighted when the Completions window is selected. Only after moving point out of both the minibuffer and the Completions window, the minibuffer window should be highlighted.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 21:14:59 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 06 17:14:59 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mjT1f-0007Kp-C3 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 17:14:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjT1c-0007Kc-Q5 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 17:14:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=guReOckQNOnAX0Ba7zwLN4v/RL1m0ki8RU4gcdDQA2w=; b=IM+1EpdZxEdpNekCKiQIzi3u0I bCrcQMEYvDkbOykKUIqwpc01ZWhcUjg8suBj2qs8xcBGXuYRe1uMMlm1/Qea269hcYg9uguTOFPt4 G6YwMwCLudeA8K1E9oT4Vzmpad6uVAEHZTeT7QVFJbE2nAyafDavnwpDXtSfg9A0pI3c=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjT1T-0001fb-4X; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:14:50 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAIVBMVEUGCAkbIyFcYl8r MS6QmZU6SkOrr6t1gXzN3dtukYz///8EiMvvAAAAAWJLR0QKaND0VgAAAAlwSFlzAAAOdAAADnQB aySz1gAAAAd0SU1FB+ULBhUBD0uvAxcAAAGdSURBVDjLzZM7c8IwDMelGOgqE2BOgeaOzeE1cwHa jiE8ukIIuX4A+g06ZO7Qu37byrk8DAdTl2pwYv3kv2XJBvhPJu/40VJ3gJiZ03a/iusafuENk14x qRlaluMIN6JczNCqz5oAmzgAoEut+kyw00rm11piD2st4sZ0qYV7qGc7bBKHx7ACB8RAf5WVLAEe Si1xHMkJSrA9Qvdkah0YchhmhyVD6wgoV0heNiGoBQU4cVVRyiyB1trQWgISIyACEVkOjArgayAI bAKXLKc6elYF1D2qzcAEffYSL2IhZhcgN5eTbhhgp1cITwsxCCowzSsQ6bFjdKqTK9JtkO9qgoYO Fac8igyg+KL16SZQrSLLadkmXU5RP8E1GAHVHDqXAuPihyTZalwIUQUAPZLlReT6lsD2qjQAsSwc NPlEU1/lichzCYYK7PZrGgUZkb72ZfehrWAi7bf3NFpx7xngZOHniybhdtsdPKdxD+lJuPFjoRYu Bkkc/3yn6WdP7ooXoVd8hIvui5uyzdF8n6j4Wkl7FC6+4Lbde81/sV84Yjaa7jwOHAAAACV0RVh0 ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0xMS0wNlQyMTowMToxNSswMDowMLcIiecAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9k aWZ5ADIwMjEtMTEtMDZUMjE6MDE6MTUrMDA6MDDGVTFbAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Seefeel's _(Ch-Vox) Redux_: "E-hix 3" Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:14:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 06 Nov 2021 20:43:31 +0200") Message-ID: <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el > that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors > with different faces: > > 1. selected window > 2. no [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el > that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors > with different faces: > > 1. selected window > 2. non-selected window > 3. selected minibuffer window > 4. non-selected minibuffer window But... isn't think pretty much unrelated to windmove, too? I'd just like to have the minibuffer light up when I've moved point somewhere else (because it can be confusing sometimes). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 19:10:26 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 06 15:10:26 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mjR58-0003qH-JL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:10:26 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:38123) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mjR56-0003q2-T9 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:10:25 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 674D0E0008; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 19:10:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt Organization: LINKOV.NET References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 20:43:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:42:18 +0100") Message-ID: <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that >>> switched on? >> >> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too. >> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise. >> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense. > > Juri -- please go ahead and put this in minibuffer.el. ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors with different faces: 1. selected window 2. non-selected window 3. selected minibuffer window 4. non-selected minibuffer window
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 02:42:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 05 22:42:30 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mjBf3-0004PV-SJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:42:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBf2-0004PI-3u for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:42:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=85gqJrTkmfrBVDCW5oARZMVGxqTRAbFJbpB/YPjcmG8=; b=Niq3Qzm56dJ3J3zc/t5UuM8m82 HOwH1bBsrKGHWBk+mdJQoCdx+Q/yOXCveD9h7QsAmpSLAAzosQshD4z5fXKyKypWultkm1+VrTLnA mHXPYEbQmQjdvkp9Orp7Tr/SrQVy3gZp9UBy/dbV2nh3sW8fFAdfgpG4Chavwo5hb33c=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBet-00026E-8O; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:42:22 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Mirry's _Mirry_: "Study in F" Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:42:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300") Message-ID: <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that >> switched [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that >> switched on? > > Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too. > But I have no idea where to put it otherwise. > Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense. Juri -- please go ahead and put this in minibuffer.el. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 02:41:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 05 22:41:36 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mjBeC-0004Nx-KC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:41:36 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBeB-0004Nk-H3 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:41:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MSGF2pw93727EY48vFhsd2vORXcq+EXJNnp26l+j6y4=; b=nSamB5QdYjrP+JAyAdm28vgbGc NLFaWSPTNTC+FceuFupsLXeHPBnvA3dWm6wpvLPKKZeBERCxQnChipdLeXrZvgkErTXnFWljNaJn8 r+FxlsM4GER+kWXsB9HS4IZ3MYHd3khfRhk1E1rz84Lf9km0JkYKVuwJO8IDuOEcLgUQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBe2-00025s-Dj; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:41:29 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN> <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Mirry's _Mirry_: "Study in F" Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:41:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:00:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87czneatuy.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > So I think we should just change the heading and put more minibuffer > stuff in minibuffer.el. I've now done so in Emacs 29. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > So I think we should just change the heading and put more minibuffer > stuff in minibuffer.el. I've now done so in Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 11:00:31 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 07:00:31 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBb71-0006E8-5J for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:00:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBb6z-0006Dv-Hu for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:00:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZMWqbN1OfIVFeb6y6/laH+OJytlV1RNz56K+4kgZ8t4=; b=tNB4mWmsg+kOrsviS0jgHzCwHr jPfPQUbhy9EwtKFYBvRIC7D/+x9PHNYh+2Q9VitvXxx6p7QxPXG/jA0qYBZvgc+t3F4DdPNxkSvzh n1eKeMjkDx8rqOvN1j0ibyrS/BR4YGzxU8UhbWJEeX5wx5xEIhwodUI8qIIcIxe6DmA0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBb6q-0002nj-Pw; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:00:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:00:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:53:46 +0300") Message-ID: <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with >> completions. Its first line is >> >> ; ; ; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions > > That's not carved in stone, though. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with >> completions. Its first line is >> >> ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions > > That's not carved in stone, though. We could change that heading > accordingly, and start adding stuff to minibuffer.el that doesn't > necessarily deal with completion. And there already is a lot of that in minibuffer.el -- just scroll to the bottom of the file and page up a bit. At least the last 100 lines have nothing to do with completion. So I think we should just change the heading and put more minibuffer stuff in minibuffer.el. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 05:53:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 01:53:55 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBWKJ-0006vL-JM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mBWKH-0006v8-RS for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mBWKC-0005S2-5I; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:48 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3491 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mBWKB-0000mc-P2; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:53:46 +0300 Message-Id: <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> > Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300 > Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > > > Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el? (But then there should probably > > be a user option to switch it on/off.) > > Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with > completions. Its first line is > > ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions That's not carved in stone, though. We could change that heading accordingly, and start adding stuff to minibuffer.el that doesn't necessarily deal with completion. > But most code that deals with the minibuffer > is somewhere in the middle of simple.el. Which is somewhat sub-optimal, I think. > Maybe it would make sense to create a new file with the name e.g. > minibuf-x.el as a mixed bag of tiny minibuffer features? I don't think a new file is justified at this time.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:04:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 18:04:55 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBP0Q-0003ex-PB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:04:54 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:34189) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mBP0N-0003eh-Q0 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:04:52 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50DCA1C0002; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt Organization: LINKOV.NET References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:53:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that >>> switched on? >> >> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too. >> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise. >> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense. > > Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el? (But then there should probably > be a user option to switch it on/off.) Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with completions. Its first line is ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions But most code that deals with the minibuffer is somewhere in the middle of simple.el. So neither minibuffer.el nor simple.el is suitable. Perhaps this was the reason why there are a lot of tiny packages that provide various minibuffer features, such as mb-depth.el, minibuf-eldef.el, rfn-eshadow.el, etc. Maybe it would make sense to create a new file with the name e.g. minibuf-x.el as a mixed bag of tiny minibuffer features?
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 08:53:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 04:53:54 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBCew-0007xb-61 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:53:54 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBCeu-0007xN-8D for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:53:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pFBDe0G5zZAEtZCThV0SbZe1RjRGFTpQ4MItgLwzG5U=; b=UFKTCuMpqbW/2UCNMTLUvmRsfH YSS9NXjDsVNI8Wf7Y9ATPoCoygo90//iW17Czg4664AFjVQsHFG0vfA+QDFiCPthCw4rEvmVuRI71 nU4qSKBzkF/2R5OAduaUZvKDGfp91rWsFpxXg4XeHrHGHB50CoE+FidieYOHnx6vpHpM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBCel-0005p7-IH; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:53:46 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:53:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300") Message-ID: <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >>> here is the patch that implements this feature: >> >> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >> active in this way ma [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >>> here is the patch that implements this feature: >> >> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't >> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that >> switched on? > > Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too. > But I have no idea where to put it otherwise. > Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense. Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el? (But then there should probably be a user option to switch it on/off.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 08:46:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 04:46:45 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBCY1-00073o-88 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:46:45 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:41315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mBCXz-0006y5-Gk for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:46:43 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23FD86000F; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:46:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt Organization: LINKOV.NET References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:42:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> here is the patch that implements this feature: > > I like it -- but does this need to be tied to > minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't > active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that > switched on? Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too. But I have no idea where to put it otherwise. Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 07:43:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 03:43:07 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBBYQ-0005mp-V4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:43:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBBYO-0005mB-6I for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:43:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FWYb9MJUG0Jctz4okTes0Hldgd703k/2E1n2iI9tjWc=; b=CZ5DPZsuONgHu+3SSPuL4S97cu ZO4NCGVCkWyRaMtxRTXQeFdgFSxqmuR7h1iImmXUPtMtB91K9XMf9XxcpCG6cCJPZ5sVsb3SvabCN r1UVVRnkPKAIelROztt5SpDinucko6PkqpWEe1CQ2SCUUCwWlbVmElkBRKrHQw3DVqHw=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBBYF-0005Gs-AH; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:42:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:42:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:47:59 +0300") Message-ID: <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > As suggested in > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-08/msg00011.html > here is the patch that implements this feature: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49844 Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > As suggested in > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-08/msg00011.html > here is the patch that implements this feature: I like it -- but does this need to be tied to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer isn't active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that switched on? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2021 08:15:43 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 03 04:15:43 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1mApaQ-0007yx-GC
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 04:15:43 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43242)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mApaN-0007yo-Ux
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 04:15:40 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36994)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mApaN-0007Md-Mv
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 04:15:39 -0400
Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:37345)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mApaL-0003k5-Ab
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 04:15:39 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN)
by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56644100006
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Organization: LINKOV.NET
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:47:59 +0300
Message-ID: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=juri@HIDDEN;
helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
As suggested in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-08/msg00011.html
here is the patch that implements this feature:
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-diff
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=minibuffer-depth-nonselected.patch
diff --git a/lisp/mb-depth.el b/lisp/mb-depth.el
index 88003afb40..ed0ebf800b 100644
--- a/lisp/mb-depth.el
+++ b/lisp/mb-depth.el
@@ -47,11 +47,36 @@ minibuffer-depth-indicator
:group 'minibuffer
:version "28.1")
+(defface minibuffer-depth-nonselected
+ '((t (:background "yellow" :foreground "dark red" :weight bold)))
+ "Face for non-selected minibuffer prompts.
+It's used after leaving the minibuffer window while the minibuffer remains active."
+ :group 'minibuffer
+ :version "28.1")
+
+(defcustom minibuffer-depth-indicate-nonselected t
+ "If non-nil, indicate the non-selected minibuffer.
+Use the face `minibuffer-depth-nonselected'."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'minibuffer
+ :version "28.1")
+
;; An overlay covering the prompt. This is a buffer-local variable in
;; each affected minibuffer.
;;
-(defvar minibuffer-depth-overlay)
-(make-variable-buffer-local 'minibuffer-depth-overlay)
+(defvar-local minibuffer-depth-overlay nil)
+(defvar-local minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay nil)
+
+(defun minibuffer-depth-select (w)
+ (if (eq (window-buffer w) (current-buffer))
+ (when (overlayp minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay)
+ (delete-overlay minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay))
+ (unless (eq major-mode 'completion-list-mode)
+ (with-current-buffer (window-buffer w)
+ (let ((ov (make-overlay (point-min) (point-max))))
+ (overlay-put ov 'face 'minibuffer-depth-nonselected)
+ (overlay-put ov 'evaporate t)
+ (setq minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay ov))))))
;; This function goes on minibuffer-setup-hook
(defun minibuffer-depth-setup ()
@@ -68,7 +93,9 @@ minibuffer-depth-setup
'face
'minibuffer-depth-indicator)
" ")))
- (overlay-put minibuffer-depth-overlay 'evaporate t))))
+ (overlay-put minibuffer-depth-overlay 'evaporate t)))
+ (when minibuffer-depth-indicate-nonselected
+ (add-hook 'window-state-change-functions 'minibuffer-depth-select nil t)))
;;;###autoload
(define-minor-mode minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode
--=-=-=--
Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49844; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.