X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#49935: gcc-4.8 fails to build with recent GCC versions Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49935.B.162837766911042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49935 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162837766911042 (code B ref -1); Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:08:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2021 23:07:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mCVPx-0002s1-Dm for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:07:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bauermann@HIDDEN>) id 1mCVPw-0002rv-Fe for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:07:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bauermann@HIDDEN>) id 1mCVPw-0001Tu-Ab for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:07:48 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.41]:15360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bauermann@HIDDEN>) id 1mCVPt-0003Fx-G9 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:07:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8687109E for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:07:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1628377660; x=1630192061; bh=FOeG8KeXC3uLmIB6UEQ27IMspoGxhLcq+jyew3cD7SE=; b=FH5OXcFuMapY CjsiQK5IqJgLSfXMAMYPAXnKxnwoAuU+2SExJmWRRYO58iYyaudYb9e8SRazf8D0 vlHMNK1rKCgiZrcCLosHZqjdQZIlR7yyCYNkIE2+7c8nL9yKLOXwJP+16j1oqFVA r7Wd6XzywIzdT5Uw6tpvZZRk5/aefOiHZSNGHGhJktp/B/0mScOO294coKiGY/Df v1HHS697qzK2knId6O1iwig8e0RyuFRzbfVSIC9LMRaI+26DWFogaDgmI5wfrA4o Dmb4sSvfY7wo+Xz+622LbSYicuyVwTT/g/Ml0rMeJ2ue0xUrwgbBlnhvMQka6JI8 depmwJzLRWtO26axrl4f/y5X5xSb+C39Ju1sbSOy/znXlbpWiG6mCkP2tI62OL7T 3adWn+IzDkKxBQEej1AU7C8pq86cmbTHM/UUM2bOfHOzm8Yu0kMiqpqx0moAhuSL ZvbzaYyOP8L6ugjdbqlC6LO0qRi+0Sbt0ZnDhsTyYf9gRLllBS0YBNqXjh0ScBM7 RnqZ0tabLR5U7wHMEnEBagxxO41kOuC7HnTED0mh40TJTFfXNjqjLig/MX9SrCHb jnDvKZBzFRumsMyj0SIWKu/med3V6Ouue5uy3+aPgpIA1/prl3SSmizWPX5oOYOz /yyvNuZBBLH7jpAEMeIN3PG97XU8Le0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxiEmHG3N1lG for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:07:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 178E9BBA for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:07:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81761493F for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:07:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:07:32 -0300 Message-ID: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.128.36.41; envelope-from=bauermann@HIDDEN; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PDS_BTC_ID=0.197, PDS_BTC_MSGID=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hello, According to the CI results, gcc-4.8 hasn=E2=80=99t built successfuly in a = while: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Dgcc-4.8 I was able to fix the current build failure: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- In file included from ../../gcc-4.8.5/gcc/cp/except.c:1008:0: cfns.gperf: In function =E2=80=98const char* libc_name_p(const char*, unsig= ned int)=E2=80=99: cfns.gperf:101:1: error: =E2=80=98const char* libc_name_p(const char*, unsi= gned int)=E2=80=99 redeclared inline with =E2=80=98gnu_inline=E2=80=99 attr= ibute cfns.gperf:26:14: note: =E2=80=98const char* libc_name_p(const char*, unsig= ned int)=E2=80=99 previously declared here =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- by backporting a patch from GCC 4.9 (which I will send in the next email), but then I hit another failure: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- In file included from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-4.8.5.drv-0/build/powerpc64le-unk= nown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/cstdlib:72:0, from ../../../../gcc-4.8.5/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_op.c= c:38: /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib.h= :38:12: error: =E2=80=98std::abort=E2=80=99 has not been declared using std::abort; ^ /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib.h= :39:12: error: =E2=80=98std::atexit=E2=80=99 has not been declared using std::atexit; ^ /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib.h= :40:12: error: =E2=80=98std::exit=E2=80=99 has not been declared using std::exit; ^ /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib.h= :51:12: error: =E2=80=98std::div_t=E2=80=99 has not been declared using std::div_t; ^ /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib.h= :52:12: error: =E2=80=98std::ldiv_t=E2=80=99 has not been declared using std::ldiv_t; ^ =E2=8B=AE =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and so on, for several `std::` functions. Unlike the other old GCC build failures I=E2=80=99ve investigated recently, I couldn=E2=80=99t find anyone= else hitting this specific problem. So we would have to create our own patch to fix it. This message from Jakub Jelinek about a similar error in some unspecified package: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@HIDDEN= /message/Q2U4JFUB5RL7DU2XJZ4BDTRE4PVULOMG/ makes me think that there=E2=80=99s something in GCC 4.8=E2=80=99s libstdc+= + (probably in libsupc++) doing something wrong with <stdlib.h> which trips GCC 6 and later. However, I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s worth making GCC 4.8 build agai= n. It=E2=80=99s not supported upstream anymore and if it=E2=80=99s needed in some bootstrap pat= h, it=E2=80=99s better to move it to =E2=80=98(gnu packages commencement)=E2= =80=99 instead. In that case, instead of fixing this build issue it=E2=80=99s likely better to just= build it with a GCC older than version 6. Is it needed for bootstrap though? The definition of =E2=80=98%bootstrap-gc= c=E2=80=99 suggests that it=E2=80=99s needed at least for armhf-linux but since aarch6= 4-linux, powerpc64le-linux and even i586-hurd use GCC 5.5, I suspect it would also work for armhf-linux as well. Therefore, my suggestion is to simply remove gcc-4.8. =2D-=20 Thanks, Thiago
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#49935: Acknowledgement (gcc-4.8 fails to build with recent GCC versions) Message-ID: <handler.49935.B.162837766911042.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 49935 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:08:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-guix@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 49935: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49935 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#49935: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.8: Fix build with GCC 6 and later References: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> In-Reply-To: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49935.B49935.162837861012562 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49935 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 49935-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49935.162837861012562 (code B ref 49935); Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 49935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2021 23:23:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mCVf4-0003GV-F4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:23:29 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.40]:59828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bauermann@HIDDEN>) id 1mCVez-0003GC-QT for 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 19:23:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955D640AE3 for <49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:23:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received:received; s= dkim20160331; t=1628378594; x=1630192995; bh=hLCmqWAkG6qu1zKyl9k YtHiF+dsv1OYhSm02/4Zhx2w=; b=5aKgEYGp3FgRlHl0f/jlwIXxLph8o86AUx8 dwOvztVGo288prJPkaQ+VUOFMnRvYPLfxZimLaKxFTmP3ZGqwK6/BrLkwUQAbYG8 SQdtPpdVYaUgt6B4/DrMpIjFSsDEX0G2pn5mzwKiSY9K88LNtM6RpUL2+YyKmGyS ihoe2MyGrsFdpevKIh6q/FgCMI7YSAVgjC7P2TTO5+9DOifYpdRqTGFZ6qz8T3tz Lj0i8cwycC1gH4XW27SWyjdWuBI38mv015DXneZ0Q230+nAyWXaibbXNsqF9B8k0 gUOC0lWhkYlpULKz79s1CjfVW4KaDLEqP07NrVAMyvjySQycvfP56HlAbiZunYbS IXHC/vzyL548vUAPgByilv8BoASG0umJIUIm7rZlT6fklj6ApUMg8YGq0I8iXf8S 0HkFJeouVQvGRLaDUK2aZJ/pFhGCJCHSvc34M5AVQH6VyNzzPVPUoi0rkSj5ZiDI o7lVF5vJlgceH82TdKW2LYSLT+kNqPthkrJgRGZFnXTHDEsr3lYzt8vP6c2yXz9M KGbkTqZZQoaaRHfBOTiJr9FBL3lT3+C7GpK8aMJz/rXMZELp4YBKy4ZZ6L+zbUQE mX/phImjcAjVQeni4s3VnkhXjA1sr6TjiHgZU/CY5XNZi4vLP2WJRjjVkTEjNO9r 3OGhL2as= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G-smV5mUe8JA for <49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A0E4084C for <49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171214951; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:23:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 20:23:00 -0300 Message-Id: <20210807232300.1074458-1-bauermann@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Versions of GCC earlier than 6 need this change in order to be built by GCC 6 and later. At the time, the fix was backported to GCC 4.9 and GCC 5 but not GCC 4.8. Therefore, backport the fix from GCC 4.9 to GCC 4.8. * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.8)[source]: Apply gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch. * gnu/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add new file. --- Hi, This is the patch I mentioned in my previous email. Despite the subject and the name of the patch file, this change is necessary but unfortunately not sufficient to make GCC 4.8 build with GCC 6 or later. This patch solves the same problem as gcc-4-compile-with-gcc-5.patch and gcc-4.6-gnu-inline.patch (which are actually the exact same patch). Regards, Thiago gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/gcc.scm | 4 +- .../gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch | 181 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk index 61ac39618a73..663f48f1833c 100644 --- a/gnu/local.mk +++ b/gnu/local.mk @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-cross-environment-variables.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-fix-texi2pod.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-libsanitizer-fix.patch \ + %D%/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-4.9-libsanitizer-fix.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-4.9-libsanitizer-ustat.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/gcc-libsanitizer-ustat.patch \ diff --git a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm index 2fe30b13210e..586673042a1c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm @@ -383,7 +383,9 @@ Go. It also includes runtime support libraries for these languages.") (patches (search-patches "gcc-arm-link-spec-fix.patch" "gcc-4.8-libsanitizer-fix.patch" "gcc-asan-missing-include.patch" - "gcc-fix-texi2pod.patch")) + "gcc-fix-texi2pod.patch" + ;; See https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01409.html + "gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch")) (modules '((guix build utils))) ;; This is required for building with glibc-2.26. ;; https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e2fe2af03d08 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/gcc-4.8-fix-build-with-newer-gcc.patch @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ +From 4c212bc2507fc8ab8caba7c5afc1257707572c45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@HIDDEN> +Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:36:41 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] backport: Make-lang.in: Invoke gperf with -L C++. + +2016-02-25 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@HIDDEN> + + Backported from mainline + 2016-02-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@HIDDEN> + Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@HIDDEN> + + * Make-lang.in: Invoke gperf with -L C++. + * cfns.gperf: Remove prototypes for hash and libc_name_p + inlines. + * cfns.h: Regenerated. + * except.c (nothrow_libfn_p): Adjust. + +From-SVN: r233721 +--- + +Obtained from: + +https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=patch;h=4c212bc2507fc8ab8caba7c5afc1257707572c45 + +The gcc/cp/ChangeLog hunk was modified to apply on top of gcc-4.8's gcc/cp/ChangeLog. + + gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 12 ++++++++++++ + gcc/cp/Make-lang.in | 2 +- + gcc/cp/cfns.gperf | 10 ++-------- + gcc/cp/cfns.h | 41 ++++++++++++++--------------------------- + gcc/cp/except.c | 3 ++- + 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +index 02776465da7..8d014bef83c 100644 +--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog ++++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ ++2016-02-25 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@HIDDEN> ++ ++ Backported from mainline ++ 2016-02-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@HIDDEN> ++ Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@HIDDEN> ++ ++ * Make-lang.in: Invoke gperf with -L C++. ++ * cfns.gperf: Remove prototypes for hash and libc_name_p ++ inlines. ++ * cfns.h: Regenerated. ++ * except.c (nothrow_libfn_p): Adjust. ++ + 2015-06-23 Release Manager + + * GCC 4.8.5 released. +diff --git a/gcc/cp/Make-lang.in b/gcc/cp/Make-lang.in +index bd1c1d78f88..a0ea0d48359 100644 +--- a/gcc/cp/Make-lang.in ++++ b/gcc/cp/Make-lang.in +@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ else + # deleting the $(srcdir)/cp/cfns.h file. + $(srcdir)/cp/cfns.h: + endif +- gperf -o -C -E -k '1-6,$$' -j1 -D -N 'libc_name_p' -L ANSI-C \ ++ gperf -o -C -E -k '1-6,$$' -j1 -D -N 'libc_name_p' -L C++ \ + $(srcdir)/cp/cfns.gperf --output-file $(srcdir)/cp/cfns.h + + # +diff --git a/gcc/cp/cfns.gperf b/gcc/cp/cfns.gperf +index 05ca753927e..d9b16b800ef 100644 +--- a/gcc/cp/cfns.gperf ++++ b/gcc/cp/cfns.gperf +@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ ++%language=C++ ++%define class-name libc_name + %{ + /* Copyright (C) 2000-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + +@@ -16,14 +18,6 @@ for more details. + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see + <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#endif +-static unsigned int hash (const char *, unsigned int); +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#endif +-const char * libc_name_p (const char *, unsigned int); + %} + %% + # The standard C library functions, for feeding to gperf; the result is used +diff --git a/gcc/cp/cfns.h b/gcc/cp/cfns.h +index c845ddf08ea..65801d1ae31 100644 +--- a/gcc/cp/cfns.h ++++ b/gcc/cp/cfns.h +@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ +-/* ANSI-C code produced by gperf version 3.0.3 */ +-/* Command-line: gperf -o -C -E -k '1-6,$' -j1 -D -N libc_name_p -L ANSI-C cfns.gperf */ ++/* C++ code produced by gperf version 3.0.4 */ ++/* Command-line: gperf -o -C -E -k '1-6,$' -j1 -D -N libc_name_p -L C++ --output-file cfns.h cfns.gperf */ + + #if !((' ' == 32) && ('!' == 33) && ('"' == 34) && ('#' == 35) \ + && ('%' == 37) && ('&' == 38) && ('\'' == 39) && ('(' == 40) \ +@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ + #error "gperf generated tables don't work with this execution character set. Please report a bug to <bug-gnu-gperf@HIDDEN>." + #endif + +-#line 1 "cfns.gperf" ++#line 3 "cfns.gperf" + + /* Copyright (C) 2000-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + +@@ -47,25 +47,18 @@ for more details. + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see + <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#endif +-static unsigned int hash (const char *, unsigned int); +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#endif +-const char * libc_name_p (const char *, unsigned int); + /* maximum key range = 391, duplicates = 0 */ + +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#else +-#ifdef __cplusplus +-inline +-#endif +-#endif +-static unsigned int +-hash (register const char *str, register unsigned int len) ++class libc_name ++{ ++private: ++ static inline unsigned int hash (const char *str, unsigned int len); ++public: ++ static const char *libc_name_p (const char *str, unsigned int len); ++}; ++ ++inline unsigned int ++libc_name::hash (register const char *str, register unsigned int len) + { + static const unsigned short asso_values[] = + { +@@ -122,14 +115,8 @@ hash (register const char *str, register unsigned int len) + return hval + asso_values[(unsigned char)str[len - 1]]; + } + +-#ifdef __GNUC__ +-__inline +-#ifdef __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ +-__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__)) +-#endif +-#endif + const char * +-libc_name_p (register const char *str, register unsigned int len) ++libc_name::libc_name_p (register const char *str, register unsigned int len) + { + enum + { +diff --git a/gcc/cp/except.c b/gcc/cp/except.c +index 221971ac956..32340f5ae83 100644 +--- a/gcc/cp/except.c ++++ b/gcc/cp/except.c +@@ -1030,7 +1030,8 @@ nothrow_libfn_p (const_tree fn) + unless the system headers are playing rename tricks, and if + they are, we don't want to be confused by them. */ + id = DECL_NAME (fn); +- return !!libc_name_p (IDENTIFIER_POINTER (id), IDENTIFIER_LENGTH (id)); ++ return !!libc_name::libc_name_p (IDENTIFIER_POINTER (id), ++ IDENTIFIER_LENGTH (id)); + } + + /* Returns nonzero if an exception of type FROM will be caught by a +-- +2.27.0 +
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#49935: gcc-4.8 fails to build with recent GCC versions Resent-From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49935.B49935.170565359414736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49935 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@HIDDEN>, 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49935-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49935.170565359414736 (code B ref 49935); Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 49935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2024 08:39:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rQkPp-0003pV-Rn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 03:39:54 -0500 Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.30]:56883) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <outgoing@HIDDEN>) id 1rQkJk-0003ey-88 for 49935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 03:33:37 -0500 Received: from [93.210.55.122] (helo=euler.schwinge.homeip.net) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <outgoing@HIDDEN>) id 1rQkJf-000000004i4-3vo6; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:33:32 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 725983 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:33:30 -0000 From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> References: <3505131.mCAMElSiHm@popigai> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3+94~g74c3f1b (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/28.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:33:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87mst1en8n.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Df-Sender: b3V0Z29pbmdAc2Nod2luZ2UubmFtZQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 03:39:50 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2021-08-07T20:07:32-0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU = Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> wrote: > In file included from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-4.8.5.drv-0/build/powerpc64le-u= nknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/cstdlib:72:0, > from ../../../../gcc-4.8.5/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_op= .cc:38: > /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib= .h:38:12: error: =E2=80=98std::abort=E2=80=99 has not been declared > using std::abort; > ^ > /gnu/store/358n1m2c8fbn6nr1mib4racjh7wfqfmy-gcc-10.3.0/include/c++/stdlib= .h:39:12: error: =E2=80=98std::atexit=E2=80=99 has not been declared > using std::atexit; > ^ > [...] This looks similar to <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41209> "AVR toolchain fails to build", fixed by commit fd96ae4a709c5509f2d78af3968d64fe805ad1ef "gnu: avr-gcc: Fix conflicting GCC headers", or <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41210> "gcc-cross-sans-libc-arm-none-eabi-4.9.4-1.227977 fails to build", fixed by commit 7f6d3f395023ff430cf8b7a981d4780698e9d132 "gnu: gcc-arm-none-eabi: Fix conflicting GCC headers".
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.