GNU bug report logs - #50645
tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error \Bbb{T}, replace hex representation by its literal form

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 50645 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 50645 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error \Bbb{T},
 replace hex representation by its literal form
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:24:23 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tags: patch


Sorry, I corrected one mistake and changed the hex presentation, I hope
now it is ok.

Regards





In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.14.6, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2021-07-31 built on Utnapischtim
Repository revision: 83a915d3dfafd5f3d737afe1e13b75e4dd3aef96
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11804000
System Description: Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS

Configured using:
 'configure --prefix=/opt/emacs28 --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-pop
 --with-mailutils'

[pretty-patch2.diff (text/patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
Cc: 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50645: tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error
 \Bbb{T}, replace hex representation by its literal form
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:43:44 +0200

Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es> writes:

> +    ("\\mathcal{A}" . 𝒜)
> +    ("\\mathcal{B}" . ℬ)

Thanks, but these are characters, so they should have a ? in front, I
think?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #11 received at 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>, 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50645: tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error
 \Bbb{T}, replace hex representation by its literal form
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:45:33 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> +    ("\\mathcal{A}" . 𝒜)
>> +    ("\\mathcal{B}" . ℬ)

> Thanks, but these are characters, so they should have a ? in front, I
> think?

Oops my macro was wrong 😶
I am sorry I correct this and send a different patch.

[smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, attachment)]

Message #14 received at 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>, 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50645: tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error
 \Bbb{T}, replace hex representation by its literal form
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:52:14 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> +    ("\\mathcal{A}" . 𝒜)
>> +    ("\\mathcal{B}" . ℬ)

> Thanks, but these are characters, so they should have a ? in front, I
> think?
I really hope now it is ok. 😎 

[pretty-patch3.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, attachment)]

Message #17 received at 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
Cc: 50645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50645: tex-mode: tex--prettify-symbols-alist Correct error
 \Bbb{T}, replace hex representation by its literal form
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 19:02:11 +0200

Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es> writes:

>> Thanks, but these are characters, so they should have a ? in front, I
>> think?
> I really hope now it is ok. 😎 

Looks good; pushed to Emacs 28 now.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.