GNU bug report logs - #50842
28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>

Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 50842 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 50842 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:52:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:51:07 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

When using M-q (fill-paragraph) in message-mode with latest version from
git-master, the result is not as I would expect.

Example buffer:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
From: xxx
To: xxx
Subject: xxx
--text follows this line--
You wrote:

> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla        
>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla      
>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla      
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

When typing M-q in the quoted text, I get this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla > bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla bla > bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla bla bla
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

But I would like to get this (as with Emacs-27.2):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
> bla bla bla bla bla
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

How could I get back the behaviour of Emacs-27.2 please?

TIA for any hints,
-- 
           Peter
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:59:42 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> writes:

> When using M-q (fill-paragraph) in message-mode with latest version from
> git-master, the result is not as I would expect.
>
> Example buffer:
>
> From: xxx
> To: xxx
> Subject: xxx
> --text follows this line--
> You wrote:
>
>> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla        
>>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla      
>>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla      

I'm unable to reproduce this problem.  Here's my steps to reproduce:

emacs -Q
C-x m

then I pasted in the text from your mail and hit `M-q' in the quoted
text, and I got:

[Message part 2 (image/png, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Are there any additional steps needed to reproduce the problem?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:18:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:17:11 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> Are there any additional steps needed to reproduce the problem?

No. But it seems, that Gnus does some whitespace-cleanup at some point.
Please copy from https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50842
then it should work. Just keep all the whitespace.

-- 
           Peter
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:21:05 +0200
Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> writes:

> No. But it seems, that Gnus does some whitespace-cleanup at some point.
> Please copy from https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50842
> then it should work. Just keep all the whitespace.

I tried that, and I still can't reproduce the problem.  (This is on the
current trunk.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:04:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:03:23 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> I tried that, and I still can't reproduce the problem.  (This is on the
> current trunk.)

Strange. There are perhaps some differences elsewhere. Here the
information about my environment:

In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 8, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20, cairo version 1.16.0)
 of 2021-09-28 built on ws
Repository revision: 7757e9b204e58419897874265a448d599dd9c69f
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12003000
System Description: openSUSE Leap 15.3

Configured features:
ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GPM GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG
JSON LCMS2 LIBOTF LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NOTIFY
INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS
X11 XDBE XIM XPM GTK3 ZLIB

Important settings:
  value of $LC_CTYPE: en_GB.utf8
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: en_GB.utf8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=local
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix

Major mode: Lisp Interaction

Minor modes in effect:
  tooltip-mode: t
  global-eldoc-mode: t
  eldoc-mode: t
  electric-indent-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  tool-bar-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  blink-cursor-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  indent-tabs-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Load-path shadows:
None found.

Features:
(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs
rfc822 mml mml-sec epa derived epg rfc6068 epg-config gnus-util rmail
rmail-loaddefs auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs
eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map text-property-search time-date
subr-x seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv mm-decode mm-bodies
mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader cl-loaddefs
cl-lib sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils
iso-transl tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks
lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd
tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace
newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar
rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock
font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic
cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao
korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech
european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript
charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray
cl-preloaded nadvice button loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files
window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages
mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind
inotify lcms2 dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting
cairo move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs)

Memory information:
((conses 16 49939 7426)
 (symbols 48 6626 1)
 (strings 32 18468 1279)
 (string-bytes 1 609958)
 (vectors 16 12862)
 (vector-slots 8 178826 7920)
 (floats 8 22 41)
 (intervals 56 220 0)
 (buffers 992 12))

-- 
           Peter
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:06:22 +0200
Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> writes:

> In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 8, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20, cairo version 1.16.0)
>  of 2021-09-28 built on ws
> Repository revision: 7757e9b204e58419897874265a448d599dd9c69f
> Repository branch: master
> Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12003000
> System Description: openSUSE Leap 15.3

Looks similar to mine:

In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 41, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, cairo version 1.16.0)
 of 2021-09-28 built on elva
Repository revision: 76e846f92a3c625fe524c81aa996327fba5a9e65
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

Can anybody else reproduce this problem?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: pm <at> a16n.net, 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:11:16 +0300
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:21:05 +0200
> Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> writes:
> 
> > No. But it seems, that Gnus does some whitespace-cleanup at some point.
> > Please copy from https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50842
> > then it should work. Just keep all the whitespace.
> 
> I tried that, and I still can't reproduce the problem.  (This is on the
> current trunk.)

Strange, because fore me it is 100% reproducible, with the current
master.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:14:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: pm <at> a16n.net, 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:12:59 +0200
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Strange, because fore me it is 100% reproducible, with the current
> master.

Can you describe the steps you take to reproduce it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:25:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #29 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: pm <at> a16n.net, 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:24:55 +0300
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: pm <at> a16n.net,  50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:12:59 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Strange, because fore me it is 100% reproducible, with the current
> > master.
> 
> Can you describe the steps you take to reproduce it?

Exactly as you did:

  emacs -Q
  C-x m
  copy/paste the example, starting from "You wrote"
  go to the first line of "bla bla"
  type C-q

Is it possible that you typed C-q on a quoted line that is not the
first one?  Because on any other line it indeed works as expected.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:29:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: pm <at> a16n.net, 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:27:58 +0200
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Is it possible that you typed C-q on a quoted line that is not the
> first one?  Because on any other line it indeed works as expected.

Ah, that's the missing detail.  With point in the first line, I can
reproduce the problem, too.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #35 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
To: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Fwd: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:19:05 -0400
Apologies. I used the "Reply" button on the bug archive page and 
didn't realize it would just reply to Lars.
I hope I'm forwarding this to the right address so it can be seen 
by all in the thread.

> Ah, that's the missing detail.

Apologies if this is an unwelcome intrusion, but I'm currently 
working on a package
to prevent this type of confusion during bug reproduction:

https://www.github.com/progfolio/yodel


The basic idea is to provide macros which make declaring a 
reproduction case easier.
It runs the test and provides a formatted report which others can 
run and compare results.
The reports can be re-formatted easily after they've been run.
Yodel currently supports github markdown, reddit markdown, Org 
syntax, and can easily be extended to support other formats.

As a case study, I wrote a test for this bug.
The yodel-file macro removes the ambiguity of "Copy this into a 
buffer, do this with point here, etc".
The yodel macro runs the test locally in a temporary, clean Emacs 
environment, and presents the formatted report.
Here's the resultant report in Org syntax:


* YODEL REPORT [2021-09-28 11:12:45]

#+begin_src emacs-lisp :lexical t :results silent
(yodel
  :post*
  (yodel-file
    :point "|"
    :with*
    "From: xxx
To: xxx
Subject: xxx

You wrote:
> | bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
> bla bla bla bla bla
>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
>           bla bla bla bla bla
>           bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
>           bla bla bla bla bla     "
    :then*
    (message-mode)
    (fill-paragraph)
    (print
     (buffer-substring-no-properties
      (point-min)
      (point-max)))))

#+end_src


** STDOUT:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp :lexical t :results silent
"From: xxx
To: xxx
Subject: xxx
--text follows this line--
You wrote:

> bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
> bla
bla bla bla > bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
bla
bla bla bla bla > bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla 
bla
bla bla bla bla bla"
#+end_src

** Environment

- =emacs version=: GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, 
  x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.17.4, Xaw3d 
  scroll bars)
 of 2021-09-23
- =system type=: gnu/linux



Just food for thought on how we could better approach reproducing 
bugs.

Thanks,
Nick





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #38 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: Fwd: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:57:37 +0200
No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com> writes:

>  The basic idea is to provide macros which make declaring a 
>  reproduction case easier.

It's an interesting idea, but I think it's unlikely that we'd get many
people to submit bug reports using something as complicated as this,
really.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:49:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #41 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: Fwd: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:48:00 -0400
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>  The basic idea is to provide macros which make declaring a 
>>  reproduction case easier.
>
> It's an interesting idea, but I think it's unlikely that we'd 
> get many
> people to submit bug reports using something as complicated as 
> this,
> really.

I agree that elisp novices probably wouldn't author many reports 
themselves.
However, there's benefit beyond that.
We use a similar macro for diagnosing bugs with straight.el and 
there are users who know enough elisp
to write reports.
The first thing I do when I get a bug report is encode it via that 
macro and have the user who reported it run it/share results. That 
confirms that there is actually a bug and we're on the same page 
about what is expected/happening. It reduces the time wasted on 
"Oh yeah, I forgot to mention a step" or "Oh yeah, I forgot to do 
that step", etc. It's even more beneficial when you have multiple 
users effected by the same bug. IME, It's a lot more efficient to 
ask someone "please paste this in your *scratch* buffer, eval, and 
copy back the results".
Once the bug is closed, the body of the macro is often still 
useful as a regression test, too.

Again, just food for thought.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:17:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #44 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: Fwd: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:16:28 +0300
> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:48:00 -0400
> Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Again, just food for thought.

Thanks.

An alternative idea is to use open-dribble-file and/or recent-keys to
generate precise recipes.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#50842; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:46:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #47 received at 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net>
Cc: 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50842: 28.0.50; problem with fill-paragraph
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:44:58 +0200
Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> writes:

> When using M-q (fill-paragraph) in message-mode with latest version from
> git-master, the result is not as I would expect.

This should now be fixed again.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




bug marked as fixed in version 28.1, send any further explanations to 50842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Peter Münster <pm <at> a16n.net> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:46:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 170 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.