Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2021 15:24:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 27 11:24:32 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mfkn2-0000pq-EW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:24:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1mfkmy-0000pe-6k for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:24:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1mfkmx-0001tN-CO for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:24:27 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:34398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1mfkmv-00016b-Ly for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:24:26 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F2D5184F41 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1635348261; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RzgCq5F4pZ/Wl0zcsLyqF8erTdOVwHRs7+T3iZWFihY=; b=WIkCF3Vj1E8CgFIr2ht6FcTzA2VlIqyFWT/qvhTki+h8sNwDi/yiMZL+PcMT8EBPJRLffd 4DjLgSmydkrTErX3rbUNf7aObFqYazR4sM2XiTm6aa5z3IwJkk/ksU/WWluyNpocZoELQy 3U+1PxQHb49NTSaA8dEGgWjgemBPgjy0LO4bNwhOGAZREcrHDIeMZ70bzc9rLlMdmgvT18 4AfseC08WhAZCFDHMwfCbRewlLexnrucxFhhWCOn8qQZTx7nSoZnaZTDMweLBrsDq6DUMz pK/krckmfdA1QvaH72Ax6W19aMl960Ntt6CvkwUbtgnyln+2fRAkNIu9CMRnmA== From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Non-default umask when using guix system leads to wrong file permissions Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:24:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87wnlya3tn.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@HIDDEN smtp.mailfrom=dev@HIDDEN Received-SPF: pass client-ip=206.189.101.64; envelope-from=dev@HIDDEN; helo=jpoiret.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, As reported on IRC by wonko (https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2021-10-27.log#115445), when running ‘guix system’ under a different umask, some files are created with the wrong permissions. This can [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=dev%40jpoiret.xyz;ip=209.51.188.17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Hi, As reported on IRC by wonko (https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2021-10-27.log#115445), when running =E2=80=98guix system=E2=80=99 under a different umask, some files are creat= ed with the wrong permissions. This can happen because =E2=80=98sudo=E2=80=99 does by = default keeps the umask it is running on (by ORing it with the default one, often 022). I'm not sure what would be the best way to go about this, I suggest checking if umask =3D=3D #o022, and if not, print a warning and set it to #o022, and only in =E2=80=98guix system=E2=80=99. What do you think? Best, Josselin Poiret
Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#51442
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.