GNU logs - #51451, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#51451: image-transform-original has a misleading name
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.51451.B.16353811201246 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 51451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:31:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkmm6C90H+24+WHkqg9qnBQGsPe9-WOGeP-dwokYLNNicqQ@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.178;
 envelope-from=stefankangas@HIDDEN; helo=mail-pf1-f178.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: 13
X-Spam_score: 1.3
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: (1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)

Severity: minor

This is the docstring of `image-transform-original'.

    (image-transform-original)

    Display the current image with the original (actual) size and
    rotation.

From reading this it is clear what it does, but the command name makes
it sound like it will transform the original image.

These are the commands under the "s" key in image-mode:

    s 0             image-transform-reset
    s b             image-transform-fit-both
    s f             image-mode-fit-frame
    s h             image-transform-fit-to-height
    s m             image-transform-set-smoothing
    s o             image-transform-original
    s r             image-transform-set-rotation
    s s             image-transform-set-scale
    s w             image-transform-fit-to-width

Perhaps this would be less confusing if these commands were named
`image-display-*' instead of `image-transform-*'?

    s 0             image-display-reset-size
    s b             image-display-fit-both
    s f             image-mode-fit-frame
    s h             image-display-fit-to-height
    s m             image-display-set-smoothing
    s o             image-display-original-size
    s r             image-display-set-rotation
    s s             image-display-set-scale
    s w             image-display-fit-to-width

Doesn't that make more sense?

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#51451: Acknowledgement (image-transform-original has a
 misleading name)
Message-ID: <handler.51451.B.16353811201246.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CADwFkmm6C90H+24+WHkqg9qnBQGsPe9-WOGeP-dwokYLNNicqQ@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 51451
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 51451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:32:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 51451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
51451: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D51451
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#51451: image-transform-original has a misleading name
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:15:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.51451.B51451.163551325726189 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
Cc: 51451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <CADwFkmm6C90H+24+WHkqg9qnBQGsPe9-WOGeP-dwokYLNNicqQ@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:14:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkmm6C90H+24+WHkqg9qnBQGsPe9-WOGeP-dwokYLNNicqQ@HIDDEN>
 (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:31:48 -0700")
Message-ID: <87bl38ynvm.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN> writes:

> Perhaps this would be less confusing if these commands were named
> `image-display-*' instead of `image-transform-*'?
>
>     s 0             image-display-reset-size
>     s b             image-display-fit-both
>     s f             image-mode-fit-frame
>     s h             image-display-fit-to-height
>     s m             image-display-set-smoothing
>     s o             image-display-original-size
>     s r             image-display-set-rotation
>     s s             image-display-set-scale
>     s w             image-display-fit-to-width
>
> Doesn't that make more sense?

It makes sense to me -- I've been confused by these commands myself.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Last modified: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.