GNU bug report logs - #51494
guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 21:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 51494 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 51494 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 21:31:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 21:31:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Guix Bug <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Cc: rprior <at> protonmail.com
Subject: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:30:31 -0400
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:17 PM  ‎jgart‎: civodul, wdyt of `--rebuild-cache` being automatic/the default for guix shell instead of having to explicitly specify the flag to rebuild the cache?  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:31 PM  ‎jgart‎: I think this is the default for docker or how docker works  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:42 PM  ‎jgart‎: I was discussing this with Ryan Prior the other day  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:45 PM  ‎nckx‎: Doesn't that defeat the purpose?  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:51 PM  ‎jgart‎: who had mentioned it to me  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:19:36 PM  ‎jgart‎: If you change the manifest then guix shell should rebuild the cache  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:19:40 PM  ‎jgart‎: that's how it works for docker  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:19:53 PM  ‎jgart‎: > Create manifest with 2 packages: python, python-requests. Run guix shell. Decide you want python-lxml instead: exit shell, edit manifest to add python-lxml, re-run guix shell. Type import lxml, it says no module named lxml.  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:20:05 PM  ‎jgart‎: That's quoting Ryan from our conversation  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:20:11 PM  ‎nckx‎: Oh.  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:20:19 PM  ‎nckx‎: That just sounds like a bug?  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:20:27 PM  ‎jgart‎: That was his experience that he was frustrated with  
‎10/29/2021 | 05:20:30 PM  ‎jgart‎: yup  




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:12:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Cc: 51494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rprior <at> protonmail.com, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51494: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 01:08:45 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
However, as added later on IRC:
> <jgart> nckx, I think that was a hypothetical bug. I don't think 
> he ever tried it with python-lxml

So I think this bug needs a concrete reproducer before we can 
assume its existence.

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:12:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 51494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rprior <at> protonmail.com, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51494: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:10:17 -0400
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 01:08:45 +0200 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
> However, as added later on IRC:
> > <jgart> nckx, I think that was a hypothetical bug. I don't think 
> > he ever tried it with python-lxml
> 
> So I think this bug needs a concrete reproducer before we can 
> assume its existence.

Yes, this can probably be closed. I think Ludo mentioned that it works as I 
hoped in the irc earlier today.

I haven't tried yet but I trust him that it does :)




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, Ryan Prior <rprior <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 51494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rprior <at> protonmail.com, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51494: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 02:35:53 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> Yes, this can probably be closed. I think Ludo mentioned that it 
> works as I 
> hoped in the irc earlier today.

Right: that's how it's supposed to work.

Then again, maybe Ryan found a scenario in which it didn't?

Let's find out more from the horse's mouth (CC'd).

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51494; Package guix. (Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Added tag(s) notabug. Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 51494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de> Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:24:14 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 141 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.