GNU bug report logs - #52449
“guix shell” in Guix checkout prints backtrace

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:34:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 52449 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#52449; Package guix. (Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:34:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:34:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: “guix shell” in Guix checkout prints backtrace
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:30:54 +0000
When running “guix shell” in a source checkout of Guix prints a
backtrace:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell
guix shell: loading environment from '/home/rekado/dev/gx/utf/guix.scm'...
hint: Consider passing the `--check' option once to make sure your shell does not clobber environment variables.

Backtrace:
          14 (primitive-load "/home/rekado/.config/guix/current/bin/guix")
In guix/ui.scm:
   2206:7 13 (run-guix . _)
  2169:10 12 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1752:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
  1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In guix/store.scm:
   658:37  9 (thunk)
   1320:8  8 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7fa80677a240 at guix/ui.scm:1156:2 (continue store things mode)> _)
In guix/status.scm:
    802:4  7 (call-with-status-report _ _)
In guix/scripts/environment.scm:
    317:4  6 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   673:15  5 (append-map #<procedure 7fa806784c00 at guix/scripts/environment.scm:317:16 (expr)> ((gc-root . "/home/rekado/.cache/guix/profiles/repcfratbkwoufn7si47j5owec2csk4wg7o5…") …))
   586:29  4 (map1 ((gc-root . "/home/rekado/.cache/guix/profiles/repcfratbkwoufn7si47j5owec2csk4wg7o5ps5qcoyl22ff5kcq") (load package "/home/rekado/dev/gx/utf/guix.scm") (# . #t) # # …))
   586:17  3 (map1 ((load package "/home/rekado/dev/gx/utf/guix.scm") (ad-hoc? . #t) (system . "x86_64-linux") (substitutes? . #t) (offload? . #t) (graft? . #t) (# . #t) (# . #t) # # #))
In guix/scripts/environment.scm:
    303:4  2 (packages->outputs _ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" #<unspecified>)'.
$ --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That’s probably because “guix.scm” doesn’t return a package.  It’s not
an environment definition, so it’s expected that this doesn’t work.  But
this backtrace is pretty ugly.  It would be nicer to bail if guix.scm
doesn’t evaluate to a package value.

-- 
Ricardo




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 135 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.