GNU bug report logs -
#52708
[BUG] Guix checkout fails `make check`
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 52708 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 52708 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
__________________________________________
[BUG] GUIX CHECKOUT FAILS `MAKE CHECK`
yewscion
__________________________________________
Table of Contents
_________________
1. Environment
2. Steps to reproduce
3. Expected Result
4. Actual Result
5. Visual Proof (screenshots, videos, text)
6. Severity/Priority
1 Environment
=============
- *Device:* Linode Virtual Server, and Lenovo Thinkpad E14.
- *OS:* Guix System, and a workplace-modified version of Ubuntu.
- *Commits:* guix: `2c469f04a3bec27b1f49680c638814bc06075b9a`.
- *Substitutes:* Enabled.
- *Additional Channels:* None inside of `guix shell --pure -D \
guix`.
- *Blast Radius:* Two Failed Checks (guix-pack-relocatable.sh and
guix-git-autenticate.sh).
2 Steps to reproduce
====================
1. *Clone:* Run `git clone
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git>`.
2. *Enter Dev Environment:* `cd guix && guix shell --pure -D guix`.
3. *Bootstrap and Configure:* `./bootstrap && ./configure
--localstatedir=/var`.
4. *Make and Check:* `make && make check`.
3 Expected Result
=================
All tests should pass or be skipped.
4 Actual Result
===============
2 FAILs, and 1 XFAIL. (guix-pack-relocatable.sh and
guix-git-autenticate.sh)
5 Visual Proof (screenshots, videos, text)
==========================================
Attached are personally created logs of each step of the process. For
further clarity, here is the output of `git -C ~/Downloads/guix log -n
1` and `guix describe` on my GuixSD install. And because I discovered
it after the fact, I've also attached the two logfiles created by the
above process (config.log and testsuite.log).
#+name git -C ~/Downloads/guix log -n 1
,----
| commit 9834ff5d3293b2af728b41314c18ca7fb2081efe (HEAD -> master,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
| Author: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
| Date: Tue Dec 21 16:15:03 2021 +0200
|
| gnu: binutils-gold: Skip gold testsuite on some architectures.
|
| * gnu/packages/base.scm (binutils-gold)[arguments]: Add a phase
on some
| architecturest to skip the gold testsuite.
`----
#+name guix describe
,----
| [16.0] {12:12} ming <at> gorse:~/$ guix describe
| Generation 18 Dec 20 2021 13:39:05 (current)
| guix 84fe3a8
| repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
| branch: master
| commit: 84fe3a88179d5a6a5c619c408a4fd4fe2a779652
| yewscion 84d82fe
| repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~yewscion/yewscion-guix-channel
| branch: trunk
| commit: 84d82fede37110a34e2df5e1712eb3bf934936cf
`----
6 Severity/Priority
===================
5 (Lowest Priority)
[test-suite.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[config.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[2021-12-21-guix-make.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[2021-12-21-guix-make-check.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[2021-12-21-guix-configure.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[2021-12-21-guix-bootstrap.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_0x1102102EBE7C3AE4.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 52708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
As an aside: It seems as though on the web interface at least I am
causing all of my attachments to be concatenated with my messages. Is
there a specific way to attach files to prevent this, or is it intended?
[OpenPGP_0x1102102EBE7C3AE4.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 52708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Christopher Rodriguez schreef op di 21-12-2021 om 12:21 [-0500]:
> 5 Visual Proof (screenshots, videos, text)
> ==========================================
>
> Attached are personally created logs of each step of the process.
> For
> further clarity, here is the output of `git -C ~/Downloads/guix
> log -n
> 1` and `guix describe` on my GuixSD install. And because I
> discovered
> it after the fact, I've also attached the two logfiles created by
> the
> above process (config.log and testsuite.log).
(Not really relevant to the bug report) It's named Guix System now, not
GuixSD. Also, logs are pure text and hence not visual?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 52708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Copy that, will refer to it as 'Guix System' from now on. I'd picked up
GuixSD from reading (apparently outdated) blog posts.
Regarding the section header, I'd just copied something I found online
for submitting good bug reports. You're right, though, it's oddly named.
I think, going forward, I'll just use the word 'Evidence'.
Thanks again!
[OpenPGP_0x1102102EBE7C3AE4.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 52708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> FAIL: tests/guix-git-authenticate
> =================================
>
> + '[' -d /home/ming/Downloads/guix/.git ']'
> + guile -c '(use-modules (git))
> (member "refs/heads/keyring" (branch-list (repository-open ".")))'
> + intro_commit=9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddccfea34bad
> + intro_signer='BBB0 2DDF 2CEA F6A8 0D1D E643 A2A0 6DF2 A33A 54FA'
> + cache_key=test-24504
> + guix git authenticate 9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddccfea34bad 'BBB0 2DDF 2CEA F6A8 0D1D E643 A2A0 6DF2 A33A 54FA' --cache-key=test-24504 --stats --end=9549f0283a78fe36f2d4ff2a04ef8ad6b0c02604
> guix git: error: Git error: cannot locate remote-tracking branch 'keyring'
> FAIL tests/guix-git-authenticate.sh (exit status: 1)
It looks like your repo is missing a ‘keyring’ branch, which causes this
test failure. Can you set up the branch as noted here:
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Building-from-Git.html
and try again?
> FAIL: tests/guix-pack-relocatable
> =================================
[...]
> + guix pack -RR python-numpy python-scipy --no-grafts -n
> guix pack: error: profile contains conflicting entries for python-numpy
> guix pack: error: first entry: python-numpy <at> 1.21.3 /gnu/store/9dd0zkkwl45rmsa7b6vjb1747l57aw4y-python-numpy-1.21.3R
> guix pack: error: second entry: python-numpy <at> 1.20.3 /gnu/store/mlccgh05bf8cdinq0ilpvpdmsspq36pv-python-numpy-1.20.3R
> guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-matplotlib <at> 3.4.3
> guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-scipy <at> 1.6.0
[...]
> 314:42 3 (display-hint "Try upgrading both @code{python-numpy} ?" ?)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1747:15 2 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7f5c9becbb10 at ic?> ?)
> In guix/build/syscalls.scm:
> 2282:35 1 (_)
> 2271:8 0 (terminal-window-size _)
>
> guix/build/syscalls.scm:2271:8: In procedure terminal-window-size:
> In procedure terminal-window-size: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> + chmod -Rf +w /tmp/tmp.L59DtouzZR
> + rm -rf /tmp/tmp.L59DtouzZR
> FAIL tests/guix-pack-relocatable.sh (exit status: 1)
Ah yes, this is a “known issue” since the recent merge. We need to
adjust the test to use other packages or something. To be continued…
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52708
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 05 Jan 2022 07:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 52708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> + guix pack -RR python-numpy python-scipy --no-grafts -n
> guix pack: error: profile contains conflicting entries for python-numpy
> guix pack: error: first entry: python-numpy <at> 1.21.3 /gnu/store/9dd0zkkwl45rmsa7b6vjb1747l57aw4y-python-numpy-1.21.3R
> guix pack: error: second entry: python-numpy <at> 1.20.3 /gnu/store/mlccgh05bf8cdinq0ilpvpdmsspq36pv-python-numpy-1.20.3R
> guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-matplotlib <at> 3.4.3
> guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-scipy <at> 1.6.0
This should no longer be a problem as we’ve renamed python-numpy <at> 1.21 to
python-numpy-next.
--
Ricardo
Reply sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 05 Jan 2022 18:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 05 Jan 2022 18:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 52708-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:05:58AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > + guix pack -RR python-numpy python-scipy --no-grafts -n
> > guix pack: error: profile contains conflicting entries for python-numpy
> > guix pack: error: first entry: python-numpy <at> 1.21.3 /gnu/store/9dd0zkkwl45rmsa7b6vjb1747l57aw4y-python-numpy-1.21.3R
> > guix pack: error: second entry: python-numpy <at> 1.20.3 /gnu/store/mlccgh05bf8cdinq0ilpvpdmsspq36pv-python-numpy-1.20.3R
> > guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-matplotlib <at> 3.4.3
> > guix pack: error: ... propagated from python-scipy <at> 1.6.0
>
> This should no longer be a problem as we’ve renamed python-numpy <at> 1.21 to
> python-numpy-next.
Closing
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 03 Feb 2022 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 82 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.