GNU bug report logs - #52731
[PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is installed.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>

Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:02:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 52731 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is installed.
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:01:01 +0100
Exit with a friendlier error message instead of throwing throwing a “failed with
signal 11” error if ‘svn’ isn’t in the user’s PATH.

  $ guix import texlive getmap
  command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-r" "59745" "svn://www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2021.3/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/getmap/" "/tmp/guix-directory.YgfGgo/doc/latex/getmap/" failed with signal 11

* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix import): Mention that Subversion has be
installed.
* guix/import/texlive.scm (tlpdb->package): Check if ‘svn’ is found in PATH,
if not exit with an error message.
---
 doc/guix.texi           | 4 +++-
 guix/import/texlive.scm | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 333cb4117a..1ece51de81 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -12020,7 +12020,9 @@
 Information about the package is obtained from the TeX Live package
 database, a plain text file that is included in the @code{texlive-bin}
 package.  The source code is downloaded from possibly multiple locations
-in the SVN repository of the Tex Live project.
+in the SVN repository of the Tex Live project.  This means that the
+@code{subversion} package has to be installed in order for the importer
+to work.
 
 The command command below imports metadata for the @code{fontspec}
 TeX package:
diff --git a/guix/import/texlive.scm b/guix/import/texlive.scm
index bdef9f58b0..e3b870efa0 100644
--- a/guix/import/texlive.scm
+++ b/guix/import/texlive.scm
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
 ;;; Copyright © 2017, 2021 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
 ;;; Copyright © 2021 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2021 Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -37,6 +38,8 @@ (define-module (guix import texlive)
   #:use-module (guix utils)
   #:use-module (guix upstream)
   #:use-module (guix packages)
+  #:use-module (guix diagnostics)
+  #:use-module (guix i18n)
   #:use-module (guix build-system texlive)
   #:export (texlive->guix-package
             texlive-recursive-import))
@@ -204,6 +207,10 @@ (define (files->directories files)
                           equal?)))
 
 (define (tlpdb->package name package-database)
+  ;; Check if 'svn' is available.
+  (unless (search-path (string-split (getenv "PATH") #\:) "svn")
+    (leave (G_ "the 'svn' program has to be in your PATH~%")))
+  
   (and-let* ((data (assoc-ref package-database name))
              (dirs (files->directories
                     (map (lambda (dir)

base-commit: 87e5502d406bfb44b61f7577b241602e02a3498e
-- 
2.33.1







Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>
To: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>, 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is installed.
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:50:57 +0100
Am Mittwoch, dem 22.12.2021 um 10:01 +0100 schrieb Xinglu Chen:
> Exit with a friendlier error message instead of throwing throwing a
> “failed with
> signal 11” error if ‘svn’ isn’t in the user’s PATH.
> 
>   $ guix import texlive getmap
>   command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-
> r" "59745"
> "svn://
> www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2021.3/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/getmap/
> " "/tmp/guix-directory.YgfGgo/doc/latex/getmap/" failed with signal
> 11
Shouldn't we use a guix-built svn here (as in svn-fetch)?







Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>,
 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is installed.
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:42:39 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Am Mittwoch, der 22. Dezember 2021, um 12:50 +01, schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler:

> Am Mittwoch, dem 22.12.2021 um 10:01 +0100 schrieb Xinglu Chen:
>> Exit with a friendlier error message instead of throwing throwing a
>> “failed with
>> signal 11” error if ‘svn’ isn’t in the user’s PATH.
>> 
>>   $ guix import texlive getmap
>>   command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-
>> r" "59745"
>> "svn://
>> www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2021.3/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/getmap/
>> " "/tmp/guix-directory.YgfGgo/doc/latex/getmap/" failed with signal
>> 11
> Shouldn't we use a guix-built svn here (as in svn-fetch)?

Which ‘svn-fetch’ are you referring to (there are two AFAICS)?  The
Texlive importer uses ‘download-multi-svn-to-store’, which itself uses
‘svn-fetch’ from (guix build svn), but it requires the ‘svn’ program to
be in PATH.

There is another ‘svn-fetch’ procedure, in (guix svn-download), but that
one returns a fixed-output derivation, so it can only be used if we
already know the hash (which we don’t, that’s why we are fetching the
SVN repo).

Importers that fetch a Git repo don’t need ‘git’ to be in PATH since
they use the Guile-Git bindings to libgit2.  But we don’t have Guile
bindings to SVN (or Hg, CVS, Bzr), so the program has to be installed on
the host system.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:29:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>, Liliana Marie Prikler
 <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>, 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#52731] [PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is
 installed.
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:23:54 +0100
Hi,

Your patch is an improvement considering this old discussion [1].

1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28303#5>


On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 14:42, Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz> wrote:

> Which ‘svn-fetch’ are you referring to (there are two AFAICS)?  The
> Texlive importer uses ‘download-multi-svn-to-store’, which itself uses
> ‘svn-fetch’ from (guix build svn), but it requires the ‘svn’ program to
> be in PATH.
>
> There is another ‘svn-fetch’ procedure, in (guix svn-download), but that
> one returns a fixed-output derivation, so it can only be used if we
> already know the hash (which we don’t, that’s why we are fetching the
> SVN repo).

The one in (guix svn-download) uses under the hood (guix build svn), if
I read correctly:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
      #~(begin
          (use-modules (guix build svn))
          (svn-fetch '#$(svn-reference-url ref)
                     '#$(svn-reference-revision ref)
                     #$output
                     #:svn-command (string-append #+svn "/bin/svn")
                     #:recursive? #$(svn-reference-recursive? ref)
                     #:user-name #$(svn-reference-user-name ref)
                     #:password #$(svn-reference-password ref)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Anyway. :-)

> Importers that fetch a Git repo don’t need ‘git’ to be in PATH since
> they use the Guile-Git bindings to libgit2.  But we don’t have Guile
> bindings to SVN (or Hg, CVS, Bzr), so the program has to be installed on
> the host system.

I think it is not related how the call is done, here (invoke “svn”
“export” …) and not (libsvn-export …).

In the snippet above, #+svn is transparently picked from the current
subversion package.  Maybe the bit

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define (subversion-package)
  "Return the default Subversion package."
  (let ((distro (resolve-interface '(gnu packages version-control))))
    (module-ref distro 'subversion)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

could go to ’(guix build svn)’, used overthere instead of “#:key
(svn-command "svn")”; and maybe exported if needed.

WDYT?


1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28303#5>


Cheers,
simon




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>, Liliana Marie Prikler
 <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>, 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#52731] [PATCH] import: texlive: Check if Subversion is
 installed.
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:21:49 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

zimoun schrieb am Mittwoch der 22. Dezember 2021 um 15:23 +01:

> Hi,
>
> Your patch is an improvement considering this old discussion [1].
>
> 1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28303#5>

Oh, looks like this has been a problem for a while, and I suspect that
it was the root cause of [1] too.

[1]: <https://yhetil.org/guix/87im0do5iq.fsf <at> yoctocell.xyz>

> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 14:42, Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz> wrote:
>
>> Which ‘svn-fetch’ are you referring to (there are two AFAICS)?  The
>> Texlive importer uses ‘download-multi-svn-to-store’, which itself uses
>> ‘svn-fetch’ from (guix build svn), but it requires the ‘svn’ program to
>> be in PATH.
>>
>> There is another ‘svn-fetch’ procedure, in (guix svn-download), but that
>> one returns a fixed-output derivation, so it can only be used if we
>> already know the hash (which we don’t, that’s why we are fetching the
>> SVN repo).
>
> The one in (guix svn-download) uses under the hood (guix build svn), if
> I read correctly:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>       #~(begin
>           (use-modules (guix build svn))
>           (svn-fetch '#$(svn-reference-url ref)
>                      '#$(svn-reference-revision ref)
>                      #$output
>                      #:svn-command (string-append #+svn "/bin/svn")
>                      #:recursive? #$(svn-reference-recursive? ref)
>                      #:user-name #$(svn-reference-user-name ref)
>                      #:password #$(svn-reference-password ref)))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Anyway. :-)
>
>> Importers that fetch a Git repo don’t need ‘git’ to be in PATH since
>> they use the Guile-Git bindings to libgit2.  But we don’t have Guile
>> bindings to SVN (or Hg, CVS, Bzr), so the program has to be installed on
>> the host system.
>
> I think it is not related how the call is done, here (invoke “svn”
> “export” …) and not (libsvn-export …).

My point was that because we don’t have Guile bindings to any VCS except
Git, the user needs to have the corresponding VCS program installed in
order for the importer to fetch the repo.

> In the snippet above, #+svn is transparently picked from the current
> subversion package.  Maybe the bit
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define (subversion-package)
>   "Return the default Subversion package."
>   (let ((distro (resolve-interface '(gnu packages version-control))))
>     (module-ref distro 'subversion)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> could go to ’(guix build svn)’, used overthere instead of “#:key
> (svn-command "svn")”; and maybe exported if needed.
>
> WDYT?

Sure, that sounds like a nice refactoring.  It seems to apply to the
other VCSs too.  :-)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#52731; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:11:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "yarl baudig" <yarl-baudig <at> mailoo.org>
To: 52731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:10:01 +0100 (CET)
May I raise back this issue as I lost some time understanding why I couldn't "guix import texlive ...". All I needed was subversion installed. Can this be at least documented in the manual please?







This bug report was last modified 1 year and 159 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.