GNU bug report logs - #52781
Xmonad broken package

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Aravind I M <iamaravindim <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:15:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 52781 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 52781 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#52781; Package guix. (Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:15:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Aravind I M <iamaravindim <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:15:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Aravind I M <iamaravindim <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Xmonad broken package
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 21:32:18 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dear Guix maintainer,

Please bump the version of Xmonad package from 0.15 to 0.16. The package
version of Xmonad seems to be behind the version of its dependencies.

Thank you

With regards,
Aravind I M
Guix SD User
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#52781; Package guix. (Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>
To: "52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Xmonad broken package
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:33:37 +0000
Which dependencies? As far as I know the versions match (e.g. xmonad-contrib wants xmonad-0.15).

In any event, all the xmonad packages can be updated, which also requires some new dependencies. Patches forthcoming.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#52781; Package guix. (Tue, 18 Jan 2022 01:41:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>
To: "52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Xmonad broken package
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 01:40:03 +0000
> Which dependencies? As far as I know the versions match (e.g. xmonad-contrib wants xmonad-0.15).
>
> In any event, all the xmonad packages can be updated, which also requires some new dependencies. Patches forthcoming.

xmonad and xmonad-contrib were both updated to have a -next version (since it introduces breaking changes and is not in the Stackage LTS we follow currently).

Can you confirm if the current or -next packages are broken for you? If they work, please close.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#52781; Package guix. (Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: "52781-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#52781: Xmonad broken package
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:55:24 -0400
Hello,

John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com> writes:

>> Which dependencies? As far as I know the versions match (e.g. xmonad-contrib wants xmonad-0.15).
>>
>> In any event, all the xmonad packages can be updated, which also
>> requires some new dependencies. Patches forthcoming.
>
> xmonad and xmonad-contrib were both updated to have a -next version
> (since it introduces breaking changes and is not in the Stackage LTS
> we follow currently).
>
> Can you confirm if the current or -next packages are broken for you? If they work, please close.

Thanks for the updates.  Closing, since we haven't heard back from the
original poster.

Maxim




bug closed, send any further explanations to 52781 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Aravind I M <iamaravindim <at> gmail.com> Request was from Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:42:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:24:16 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 232 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.