GNU bug report logs -
#53067
NonGNU ELPA: Packages removed from elpa-packages still on archive
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 53067 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, philipk <at> posteo.net, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#53067
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, philipk <at> posteo.net, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
In this commit, a package was removed:
commit 340e98ee8d52185c8c65f0ce59bb61d5a188a9f4
Author: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Date: Fri Oct 22 19:20:45 2021 +0200
* elpa-packages (color-theme-tangotango): Remove package
However, it still is available for download:
https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/color-theme-tangotango.html
Should we remove packages automatically if they are not listed in
elpa-packages?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#53067
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 10 Jan 2022 01:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 53067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas [2022-01-07 02:31:25] wrote:
> In this commit, a package was removed:
> commit 340e98ee8d52185c8c65f0ce59bb61d5a188a9f4
> Author: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Date: Fri Oct 22 19:20:45 2021 +0200
> * elpa-packages (color-theme-tangotango): Remove package
> However, it still is available for download:
> https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/color-theme-tangotango.html
> Should we remove packages automatically if they are not listed in
> elpa-packages?
Good question. The current scripts don't, obviously, but that's just
a side effect of the way they work. Whether we remove them from
`archive-contents` or not, I think it's important to keep their
`<pkg>.html` page, who updated with a note explaining that it's
been removed.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 322 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.