GNU bug report logs - #53416
mesboot derivations, build phase errors, No targets specified and no makefile found

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 53416 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: mesboot derivations, build phase errors, No targets specified and
 no makefile found
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:10:01 +0000

I'm looking at the failed builds for the following derivations:

http://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/2ygj1zfybdnb1v40ik46l37inj6jjkwr-make-mesboot-3.82.drv
http://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/4azilx11f0mg8kyh761yqgrrzlhh6ddh-grep-mesboot-2.0.drv
http://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/rsjbdnk4wsizbnzmc3f5ry7b50vg8h7n-tar-mesboot-1.22.drv
http://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/vshbmv0jzcirxbz5c8s5av97s1n9jwpc-gawk-mesboot-3.1.8.drv
http://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/sr66h246j74ci952p37a48j6ilx6smc4-sed-mesboot-4.0.6.drv

The failed parts look like the following:


starting phase `build'
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
srfi-34 #<condition &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: () exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 11f8080> 
phase `build' failed after 0.0 seconds
command "make" failed with status 2


starting phase `build'
make: *** No rule to make target `gawk'.  Stop.
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
srfi-34 #<condition &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: ("gawk") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 11adbc0> 
phase `build' failed after 0.0 seconds
command "make" "gawk" failed with status 2

Message #8 received at 53416 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>, 49985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 53416 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel <at> gnu.org,
 53415 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Merging core-updates?
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:03:15 +0100

Andreas Enge writes:

> Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:39:39AM +0100 schrieb Janneke Nieuwenhuizen:
>> I have released 0.24.2 and updated mes-boot on core-updates as
>> Let's hope this fixes these bugs.
>
> With your latest patch, I have successfully bootstrapped core-updates
> on x86_64 up to hello and mpc. Thanks a lot!

Great, thanks so much for checking!  Are you using any of tmpfs or btrfs
on /tmp?

Greetings,
janneke

-- 
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com

Message #11 received at 53416 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>, 49985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 53416 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel <at> gnu.org,
 53415 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Merging core-updates?
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:24:02 +0100

Am Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 04:03:15PM +0100 schrieb Janneke Nieuwenhuizen:
> Great, thanks so much for checking!  Are you using any of tmpfs or btrfs
> on /tmp?

No, it is all on SSD, so we probably cannot conclude for the bugs,
unfortunately.

Andreas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.