GNU bug report logs -
#54794
Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 54794 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54794
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Guix,
Devin Ulibarri from the FSF rightfully pointed out that the licence of,
e.g., <https://guix.gnu.org/en/screenshots/virtual-machine/> is not
obvious. It should be made so on the Web page itself.
From memory I'd say these are ‘public domain’, and [0] concurs, but I
doubt [0] was explicitly intended to cover these images not contributed
by Luis Felipe.
My Web mail can't find it, but there's an ongoing thread about
relicencing the blog posts to CC-(BY?)-SA-whatever 4.0. If it applies
well to images (and I think it does), that or CC0 seem like the two
obvious choices.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
[0]:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/README#n101
— last section.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54794
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> or CC0
…was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed at
least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo.
(One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software
artworks… illegal?)
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54794
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 19:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix schreef op vr 08-04-
2022 om 18:15 [+0200]:
> On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> wrote:
> > or CC0
>
> …was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed at
> least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo.
>
> (One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software
> artworks… illegal?)
>
Wikimedia people have thought about things like this:
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Screenshots>.
AFAICT they haven't looked into what happens if its a screenshot of
multiple sofware things with incompatible licenses (e.g. some GPL-2-
only and some GPL-3-only software) though ...
Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 233 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.