GNU bug report logs - #54794
Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:03:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 54794 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#54794; Package guix. (Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:01:55 +0200
Guix,

Devin Ulibarri from the FSF rightfully pointed out that the licence of, 
e.g., <https://guix.gnu.org/en/screenshots/virtual-machine/> is not 
obvious.  It should be made so on the Web page itself.

From memory I'd say these are ‘public domain’, and [0] concurs, but I 
doubt [0] was explicitly intended to cover these images not contributed 
by Luis Felipe.

My Web mail can't find it, but there's an ongoing thread about 
relicencing the blog posts to CC-(BY?)-SA-whatever 4.0.  If it applies 
well to images (and I think it does), that or CC0 seem like the two 
obvious choices.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

[0]: 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/README#n101 
— last section.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#54794; Package guix. (Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:16:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54794: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:15:05 +0200
On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 
wrote:
> or CC0

…was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed at 
least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo.

(One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software 
artworks… illegal?)

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#54794; Package guix. (Fri, 08 Apr 2022 19:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 54794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54794: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:24:59 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix schreef op vr 08-04-
2022 om 18:15 [+0200]:
> On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 
> wrote:
> > or CC0
> 
> …was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed at 
> least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo.
> 
> (One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software 
> artworks… illegal?)
> 

Wikimedia people have thought about things like this:
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Screenshots>.

AFAICT they haven't looked into what happens if its a screenshot of
multiple sofware things with incompatible licenses (e.g. some GPL-2-
only and some GPL-3-only software) though ...

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 233 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.