Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2022 12:45:13 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 13 08:45:13 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npUfR-0007PV-4K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 08:45:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1npUfP-0007HV-8S for 55388 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 08:45:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=k3yqphzM4xjMYyQQsN5IjdAJ/U56GTHx8JJob+/jt4E=; b=nFQ6Z6voLiMqqRSk7d99Gq2Wvd 3l3j5qDfiBAFdb9hPYmTKp6PncEPQcnuMmKpjuVprVJll6LjEURNRFpxV8ojVgCFVvdf0qCcKTCot pu7aCYmWURT5tFwrSzd5I+eW734E7Nkh8SZpfdaW6OQvLGUPd8Z102hd1qOYF856AS6w=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1npUfG-0000f6-6Q; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:45:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Band Apart's _Marseille_: "Marseille" Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:45:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735hetx8s.fsf@HIDDEN> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200") Message-ID: <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@HIDDEN> writes: > "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks > a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. > > Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/ch [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55388 Cc: 55388 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@HIDDEN> writes: > "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks > a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. > > Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither > provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would > it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? Are all .el files supposed to have either a Package: header or a `provides' these days? I wasn't aware of that... Hm... I see that Chong did something like that with all the preloaded .el files in bd78fa1d544, so I guess that's true? > Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? > > Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of > the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature. I think it's separate thing, but it should have a provides, so I've now added that. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#55388
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2022 18:35:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 12 14:35:41 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npDf3-0007Re-Mj for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <jonas@HIDDEN>) id 1npDf2-0007RX-D9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <jonas@HIDDEN>) id 1npDf1-0007AG-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:57936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <jonas@HIDDEN>) id 1npDez-0008PS-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19872165AB for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=sel2011a; t= 1652380532; bh=AE0Ki6kES8TYVEt4xcW2OcwEf2e2Zke7H6kd0CRXvO0=; b=c C1ZOLZV8HkTaOJyemaUioDSUOvwSuf1iAzoXrjfBpKmvgGAZwYSaD1PY4ph6nPoh BrGFGKFoNv1qdRomUo/XSehyS2GoqeCRd5yqSEq0RMJ+XE6auUxLKIDRc8Dl16ms 8hFgf4KgVdDprXOKIeMDyBhGa0ByKjI/6vfA7jbkHc= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id bNOF5TIyhL-K for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB02B1658A for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: <8735hetx8s.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@HIDDEN; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@HIDDEN>
:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#55388
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.