GNU bug report logs - #55483
bad link

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 55483 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 55483 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: bad link
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 22:42:28 +0800

On https://gnus.org/manual/gnus.html#Top there are links like
https://gnus.org/message/index.html#Top
which are broken.

Message #8 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:54:17 +0300

> From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
>  <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 22:42:28 +0800
> 
> On https://gnus.org/manual/gnus.html#Top there are links like
> https://gnus.org/message/index.html#Top
> which are broken.

This is not where we maintain the Gnus manual nowadays.  Please use
this URL:

   https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/index.html

Gnus is part of the Emacs distribution now, and is developed as part
of Emacs in the same Git repository, so its manual is now one of the
manuals that come with Emacs.

Message #11 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 19:40:35 +0200

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Gnus is part of the Emacs distribution now, and is developed as part
> of Emacs in the same Git repository, so its manual is now one of the
> manuals that come with Emacs.

Yup.  There's still a copy of the manual on gnus.org so old links aren't
broken, but it's not updated.

So I'm closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #16 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:35:18 +0800

Well gnus.org is where Google likes to take people who are looking for
gnus, so alas they will think the project has been abandoned.

Message #19 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:20:33 +0300

> From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:35:18 +0800
> 
> Well gnus.org is where Google likes to take people who are looking for
> gnus, so alas they will think the project has been abandoned.

The conclusion is to trust Google somewhat less, and the Emacs's own
documentation somewhat more.

Message #22 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 18:47:06 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > Well gnus.org is where Google likes to take people who are looking for
  > > gnus, so alas they will think the project has been abandoned.

  > The conclusion is to trust Google somewhat less, and the Emacs's own
  > documentation somewhat more.

Can we get gnus.org updated to tell people gnus is now included in Emacs?
 
-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Message #25 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, larsi <at> gnus.org, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 08:55:28 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hmm, gnus.org is registered to a suspicious user in:
State/Province: NO STATE
Registrant Country: NO
Hahaha, sounds like a black hole instead of a country! Sounds even worse
than the Land of Oz!

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #28 received at 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#55483: bad link
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 08:32:01 +0300

> From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: jidanni <at> jidanni.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, 55483 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 18:47:06 -0400
> 
>   > > Well gnus.org is where Google likes to take people who are looking for
>   > > gnus, so alas they will think the project has been abandoned.
> 
>   > The conclusion is to trust Google somewhat less, and the Emacs's own
>   > documentation somewhat more.
> 
> Can we get gnus.org updated to tell people gnus is now included in Emacs?

I don't know who has access to that site.  Maybe Lars does.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.