GNU bug report logs - #56251
Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:15:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 56251 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 56251 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:14:18 -0700
Severity: wishlist

We have moved all the extra information in the *Help* buffer to the end.
For example, see `org-agenda-ignore-drawer-properties':

  This variable is an alias for ‘org-agenda-ignore-properties’.
  This variable is obsolete since 9.0;
  use ‘org-agenda-ignore-properties’ instead.
  You can customize this variable.

This is very welcome.  However, I find that the obsoletion warning is
easy to miss.  Presumably, this is very important information before
even considering using the variable.  We want to strongly discourage
that, right?

So how about making that particular part more prominent, for example by
moving it back up to the top again, or by giving it some color?




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56251: Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:51:31 +0200
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:

> However, I find that the obsoletion warning is
> easy to miss.  Presumably, this is very important information before
> even considering using the variable.  We want to strongly discourage
> that, right?
>
> So how about making that particular part more prominent, for example by
> moving it back up to the top again, or by giving it some color?

I think moving it back to the top makes sense -- it's very important
information.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:49:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: "56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [External] : bug#56251: Make obsoletion info more prominent in
 *Help* buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:48:32 +0000
> > However, I find that the obsoletion warning is
> > easy to miss.  Presumably, this is very important information before
> > even considering using the variable.  We want to strongly discourage
> > that, right?
> >
> > So how about making that particular part more prominent, for example
> > by moving it back up to the top again, or by giving it some color?
> 
> I think moving it back to the top makes sense -- it's very important
> information.

No, it's not more important than the other
meta-information that you've moved to the end.
It's a footnote - should be, anyway.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:23:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56251: Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:22:25 +0200
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> I think moving it back to the top makes sense -- it's very important
> information.

I've now done so in Emacs 29.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




bug marked as fixed in version 29.1, send any further explanations to 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Jun 2022 19:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>, 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56251: Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:24:13 +0200
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:

> However, I find that the obsoletion warning is easy to miss.

+1 As a user, I missed it multiple times.  I would expect deprecation
warnings to show first.  Otherwise, the user might spend their time
learning about something just to discover, at the very end, that they
should learn about and use something else.  That does not make much
sense.

P.S. The *Help* buffer could use more typography and color affordances.
In this case, I would expect strike-through on the symbol name, or the
word "deprecated" displayed in red, or something else.

R+
-- 
"Be especially critical of any statement following the word
'obviously.'"
-- Anna Pell Wheeler, 1883-1966

Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com> [he/him]
Studenohorská 25
84103 Bratislava
Slovakia




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#56251; Package emacs. (Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:33:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
To: Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>
Cc: 56251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefan <at> marxist.se
Subject: Re: bug#56251: Make obsoletion info more prominent in *Help* buffer
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:32:41 -0400
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > +1 As a user, I missed it multiple times.  I would expect deprecation
  > warnings to show first.

I think that makes sense.

Could we also put them in a different color, for emphasis?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)






bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 264 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.