GNU bug report logs - #56410
[BUG] SBCL, GNU CLISP, and ASDF

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 20:47:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 56410 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#56410; Package guix. (Tue, 05 Jul 2022 20:47:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 05 Jul 2022 20:47:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [BUG] SBCL, GNU CLISP, and ASDF
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 16:30:18 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Per this[1] conversation on IRC, there is an issue with ASDF being
installed for SBCL while using GNU CLISP. It seems that when sbcl
libraries are installed, there are also some files created in
/etc/common-lisp/ that, by default, cause /any/ implementation of Common
Lisp using ASDF to prefer the SBCL libraries.

This can currently be worked around using an init file[2], but this is
not a user-friendly situation. I am looking into a possible solution,
but wanted to report the bug now in case someone else has more
experience than me.


[1]: https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-07-04.log#214848
[2]: http://paste.debian.net/1246303/

--

Christopher Rodriguez
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 293 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.