GNU bug report logs -
#56751
Protocol of parent record type is ignored
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 56751 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#56751
; Package
guile
.
(Sun, 24 Jul 2022 20:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 24 Jul 2022 20:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
(import (rnrs records syntactic)
(rnrs base))
(define-record-type
(#{I have one field, but no need to set it, I'll do it myself}#
make-1 type-1?)
(fields (immutable #{field with a fixed value}# #{get first field
value}#))
(protocol
(lambda (%make)
(lambda ()
(#;(%make) ;; XXX unlike what is documented, this needs to be:
%make
;; instead. Bug in inmplementation or documentation? Not the issue
;; I wanted to note though.
"some value")))))
(assert (string=? (#{get first field value}# (make-1)) "some value")) ; ok
(define-record-type (#{the subtype}# make-2 type-2?)
(parent #{I have one field, but no need to set it, I'll do it myself}#))
;; The problem:
;;
;; Guile seems to have forgotten that the protocol of the supertype,
;; and hence asks for a value for the argument even though the protocol
;; of the original record type normally would give it a value.
;; (Ok, this is interpretation for the symptoms, I haven't yet tested
this against
;; the source code).
;;
;; This manifests as make-2 havng arity 1 though it should have arity 1:
#;
(assert (equal? (#{get first field value}# (make-2) "some value"))) ;;
--> wrong number of arguments to #<procedure ...>
;; We can due to the bug also break the abstraction: (see assert failure)
(assert (equal? (#{get first field value}# (make-2
'break-the-abstraction)) "some value")) ;; --> wrong number of arguments
to #<procedure ...>
;; Note: if I explicitly write the protocol for the subtype, then all
the problems disappear
;; (work-around). For an example in the wild, see the supertype
<lost-and-found> at
;;
<https://git.gnunet.org/gnunet-scheme.git/tree/gnu/gnunet/concurrency/lost-and-found.scm>
;; and the subtype at
<https://git.gnunet.org/gnunet-scheme.git/tree/gnu/gnunet/dht/client.scm#n583>
;; (Not the best example, as I give the new fields default values as
well, but you get the idea.)
[OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 157 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.